SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

All we need to do

Created by: KeepUps15
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 4, 2020
Published: Mar. 4, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$750,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
3$2,500,000
4$3,750,000
2$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Tierney, Chris [RFA Rights]
OTT
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Johnsson, Andreas
  3. 2020 4th round pick (VGK)
2.
TOR
  1. Savard, David
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (CBJ)
  3. 2022 4th round pick (CBJ)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$84,000,000$80,437,283$0$0$3,562,717
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,062,500$1,062,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 4, 2020 at 8:09 a.m.
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,406
Likes: 22,627
"All we need to do". Going with a 20 man roster? No more logical cap cutting measure needed
Mar. 4, 2020 at 8:24 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Johnsson>Tierney
Mar. 4, 2020 at 8:34 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,422
Likes: 1,457
Quoting: AFOX10900
Johnsson>Tierney


Columbus wants a top 6 centre. I don't think Ottawa wants to give up Tierney
Mar. 4, 2020 at 9:07 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 564
Savard is one year away from UFA status and they would lose him trying to retain Freddie and Hyman. Also, he's not that good. He's slow and hits and is right handed, so obviously he is what every Leafs fan thinks we need. We need D who can move the puck to our forwards, we already had big dudes who can hit and just play D, and nobody wants Marincin or Polak in the lineup. The reason Muzzin works is because he can do both.

Do we really feel like this team acquiring one marginal top-4 RHD is going to make a giant difference?
Mar. 4, 2020 at 9:20 a.m.
#5
Leafs fan...sorry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 684
Likes: 222
Quoting: newballcoach
Savard is one year away from UFA status and they would lose him trying to retain Freddie and Hyman. Also, he's not that good. He's slow and hits and is right handed, so obviously he is what every Leafs fan thinks we need. We need D who can move the puck to our forwards, we already had big dudes who can hit and just play D, and nobody wants Marincin or Polak in the lineup. The reason Muzzin works is because he can do both.

Do we really feel like this team acquiring one marginal top-4 RHD is going to make a giant difference?


Leafs shouldn't try to retain Freddie imo. Look for a cheaper starter to bridge the gap until Woll or Scott are ready. Freddie will just be too expensive, and getting older
Mar. 4, 2020 at 10:07 a.m.
#6
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,589
Likes: 3,086
I'm already a tad unconvinced on the idea of Tierney being a #2C upgrade here (and thus worth losing Savard for). Having us add multiple picks makes it an easy "no" for me.
Mar. 4, 2020 at 10:14 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 564
Quoting: KileDoobis
Leafs shouldn't try to retain Freddie imo. Look for a cheaper starter to bridge the gap until Woll or Scott are ready. Freddie will just be too expensive, and getting older


I don't think they have a better option. How do you get a cheap starter? Usually they're cheap because they're young. Either trade a lot for one or draft one. The Leafs probably aren't parting with ANOTHER high draft pick to add a goalie who may or may not work out. Toronto NEEDS a good goalie to be successful, we have seen that this year. Picking up a cheap guy off of UFA is not going to help this team.

If Freddie is so bad and Leaf fans don't want him, why the assumption he's going to be expensive? I can't see him getting much of a raise on what he makes now? Gibson makes 6.4 on a very longterm deal and was better than Freddie when he signed it. He's not getting Bobrovsky money no matter what, Rask makes 7, RInne 5. I could see Freddie getting a modest raise but he's probably not getting much more then the 5 he earns now.

Plus with Scott's surgery (and missed year) and Woll's not super awesome AHL debut season, there's no guarantee either one of them are an NHL calibre goalie.
Mar. 4, 2020 at 12:10 p.m.
#8
Leafs fan...sorry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 684
Likes: 222
Quoting: newballcoach
I don't think they have a better option. How do you get a cheap starter? Usually they're cheap because they're young. Either trade a lot for one or draft one. The Leafs probably aren't parting with ANOTHER high draft pick to add a goalie who may or may not work out. Toronto NEEDS a good goalie to be successful, we have seen that this year. Picking up a cheap guy off of UFA is not going to help this team.

If Freddie is so bad and Leaf fans don't want him, why the assumption he's going to be expensive? I can't see him getting much of a raise on what he makes now? Gibson makes 6.4 on a very longterm deal and was better than Freddie when he signed it. He's not getting Bobrovsky money no matter what, Rask makes 7, RInne 5. I could see Freddie getting a modest raise but he's probably not getting much more then the 5 he earns now.

Plus with Scott's surgery (and missed year) and Woll's not super awesome AHL debut season, there's no guarantee either one of them are an NHL calibre goalie.


I'm not saying Freddie is bad, he's no doubt been the MVP for the past few seasons. But we can't afford to give him a long term contract that we'll regret. My guess is he'd ask for something around 7.5-8 mil for 4-5 years, and that too much for the Leafs cap situation. Some have suggested that perhaps Campbell could be a starter, or work in a tandem with another cheap tendy. I just don't think that a long contract for Freddie would be a good decision.
Mar. 4, 2020 at 3:52 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,422
Likes: 1,457
Quoting: newballcoach
Savard is one year away from UFA status and they would lose him trying to retain Freddie and Hyman. Also, he's not that good. He's slow and hits and is right handed, so obviously he is what every Leafs fan thinks we need. We need D who can move the puck to our forwards, we already had big dudes who can hit and just play D, and nobody wants Marincin or Polak in the lineup. The reason Muzzin works is because he can do both.

Do we really feel like this team acquiring one marginal top-4 RHD is going to make a giant difference?

Ok. So you think we can give up nothing for a top 4 defenseman. Bruh

If you want a real top 4 defenseman, give up one of your top 4 forwards or Robertson
Mar. 4, 2020 at 3:53 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,422
Likes: 1,457
Quoting: Viqsi
I'm already a tad unconvinced on the idea of Tierney being a #2C upgrade here (and thus worth losing Savard for). Having us add multiple picks makes it an easy "no" for me.


Lol Savard is a rental and is definitely gonna test free agency. If anything leafs would say know because we want a defenseman with term. Chris can play second line centre no doubt. And its not like you guys already have a top 4 without Savard.
Mar. 4, 2020 at 5:56 p.m.
#11
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,589
Likes: 3,086
Quoting: Hockeytor15
Lol Savard is a rental and is definitely gonna test free agency.

This based on what? The tired "lol columbus can't keep anyone" narrative? Heck, at a minimum we'd keep him on the roster so as to distract Seattle's attention away from other guys.

Quoting: Hockeytor15
Chris can play second line centre no doubt. And its not like you guys already have a top 4 without Savard.

Boone Jenner can play second line center, but I'd prefer someone who does the job well. And what is that last sentence supposed to mean?
Mar. 4, 2020 at 7:26 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,422
Likes: 1,457
Quoting: Viqsi
This based on what? The tired "lol columbus can't keep anyone" narrative? Heck, at a minimum we'd keep him on the roster so as to distract Seattle's attention away from other guys.


Boone Jenner can play second line center, but I'd prefer someone who does the job well. And what is that last sentence supposed to mean?


You guys already have a top 4 d without Savard. You guys have no cap space to afford Savard if you decide to keep PLD and why would he want to stay when you got Jones, ZW, Murray and Nutivara. You even have incoming Gabriel Carlson. If you got Tierney you would be clearing cap space and getting what you need
Mar. 6, 2020 at 8:59 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 564
Quoting: Hockeytor15
Ok. So you think we can give up nothing for a top 4 defenseman. Bruh

If you want a real top 4 defenseman, give up one of your top 4 forwards or Robertson


Which is exactly why they aren't going to go out and get a "true #1 RHD". So they will get a second pairing guy and play him at first. I didn't say that wasn't the plan, just that I don't think it should be Savard.
Mar. 6, 2020 at 9:02 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 564
Quoting: KileDoobis
I'm not saying Freddie is bad, he's no doubt been the MVP for the past few seasons. But we can't afford to give him a long term contract that we'll regret. My guess is he'd ask for something around 7.5-8 mil for 4-5 years, and that too much for the Leafs cap situation. Some have suggested that perhaps Campbell could be a starter, or work in a tandem with another cheap tendy. I just don't think that a long contract for Freddie would be a good decision.


If Freddie asks for that he becomes the fifth highest paid goaltender in the NHL. He's not going to get that, no team gives that to him. The Leafs are smart and see what happens when you pay a goalie big money. Of the teams with top-10 goalie cap hits, only three are going to the playoffs this year. Like I said, I don't expect Freddie to get a big raise, if he gets one at all. Fred is currently 14th on this list, and of the top 15, only 4 are making the playoffs (Vegas is on the list twice because of Lehner). Paying goalies is the way to lose, not win.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll