SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I have a Tampa-Leafs trade idea - dont know if it sucks or no

Created by: SammyT_51
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 10, 2020
Published: Mar. 10, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Im not actually sure on value, but hear me out. Liljegren for Cernak swap. Helps both teams imo

Also Marlies:

Agostino - Brooks - Puljujärvi
Petan - Ruzicka - Turkulainen
Holmberg - Kossila - Aberg
Veronneau - MacMaster - Pooley
Elynuik - Conrad - Brazeau

Rosén - Lindgren
Kivihalme - Duszak
Kokkonen - Pokka (or other RD veteran of similar two-way qualities)
Rubins - Hollowell

Woll - Hutchinson

Also expecting 83.5M salary cap.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
3$925,000
3$925,000
3$800,000
3$800,000
3$800,000
3$800,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
1$800,000
3$2,350,000
4$3,000,000
6$4,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Turkulainen, Jerry
2$800,000
Pokka, Ville
1$800,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Cernak, Erik [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
4M x 6Y
TBL
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
Additional Details:
You would get similar two-way RD back who is on ELC and that helps cap situation of yours and keeping Sergachev. You can put Liljegren into lineup and play him. He is good. Leafs probably add little, but its close in value imo. You tell me. Foote, Liljegren both coming in would be big help cap wise. Both have two more years on ELC. Leafs sign Cernak to Pesce-like contract.
2.
TOR
  1. Emberson, Ty [Reserve List]
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (ARI)
3.
TOR
  1. Lundeström, Isac
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (ANA)
ANA
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. 2020 5th round pick (VGK)
4.
TOR
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Reserve List]
5.
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$83,124,783$0$0$375,217

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,350,000$2,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 10, 2020 at 10:41 a.m.
#1
Leafs fan...sorry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 684
Likes: 222
I like this concept
SammyT_51 liked this.
Mar. 10, 2020 at 10:43 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Pretty sure Tampa would say Hell Yes, But Toronto probably says Hell No.
Mar. 10, 2020 at 10:46 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Pretty sure Tampa would say Hell Yes, But Toronto probably says Hell No.


It helps both teams imo. Cernak is defensive Dman who can move the puck and is tough to play against but needs contract. Tampa gets more offensively capable two-way Dman that is smaller than Cernak but still strong two-way guy who would fit with Hedman or McDonagh perfectly.
Austerity liked this.
Mar. 10, 2020 at 10:49 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: SammyT_51
It helps both teams imo. Cernak is defensive Dman who can move the puck and is tough to play against but needs contract. Tampa gets more offensively capable two-way Dman that is smaller than Cernak but still strong two-way guy who would fit with Hedman or McDonagh perfectly.


Couldn't agree more, With Tampa being my 2nd favorite team. I definitely approve of this trade. Nicely done.
SammyT_51 liked this.
Mar. 10, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 1,640
The trade makes a lot of sense with TO out of time to develop Liljegren a Cernak Liljegren swap is pretty smart for both teams
SammyT_51 liked this.
Mar. 10, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.
#6
TennisGuy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 98
Likes: 38
Quoting: SammyT_51
It helps both teams imo. Cernak is defensive Dman who can move the puck and is tough to play against but needs contract. Tampa gets more offensively capable two-way Dman that is smaller than Cernak but still strong two-way guy who would fit with Hedman or McDonagh perfectly.


I appreciate your input sir
SammyT_51 liked this.
Mar. 10, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 84
Likes: 10
I`m sure Mikheyev will come in well under 3M too.
Mar. 10, 2020 at 12:01 p.m.
#8
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,155
Likes: 10,700
Think it’s a good trade both ways. I know you hate giving up Lilly too...
Mar. 10, 2020 at 12:09 p.m.
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,072
Likes: 22,466
Like the concept for both teams. But don't like the idea of going with a low scorer centre from the SHL as the 3rd centre. So the question really is Is Kerfoot and Liljegren better or worse than Cernak and Lunderstrom?
Mar. 10, 2020 at 12:11 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Jamiepo
Think it’s a good trade both ways. I know you hate giving up Lilly too...


I loooove Liljegren.. would never consider trading him unless we get big time D back.
Mar. 10, 2020 at 12:12 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: palhal
Like the concept for both teams. But don't like the idea of going with a low scorer centre from the SHL as the 3rd centre. So the question really is Is Kerfoot and Liljegren better or worse than Cernak and Lunderstrom?


Lundestrom is step back in production tbh, but he might fit in better than Kerfy. HE is defensively great, speedy, is a strong player with and without the puck and just imo better fit cap wise and for future.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll