Both teams laugh hysterically then block your number

Is that so, care to explain?

he has no idea what hes talking about, typical guy saying any leaf trade is bad, huge loser

i mean for MIN there is no real intriguing piece

Wild don't need a middle 6 center. Would it help get the point across if I spelled it centre?

i was referring more to the 2 others tbh, should have been more clear

don't see an issue with either of those too

liljegren is better and 5 years younger than lyubushkin, dvorak and johsson is closer, so dont know how az would laugh. same with nj, zacha is having his best year as a pto and his trade vaule sky rockets? none of these trades are bad

Why would Arizona trade their 1C for a middle 6 LW and a RD prospect when they are stacked on young RD prospects.

Why would Minnesota trade their starting goalie and #1 defense for a 3rd line center a backup and a 1st in not even in this year.

Values are way off my guy

For starters Dvorak isn't their 1 C, Johnsson actually has better production at third line minutes than Dvorak does, Johnsson is less money for essentially the same production, Liljegren is a much better prospect than Lybushkin which makes up the value difference. As for the Minny trade I'd gladly reverse it the reality is that's as much value as I'd give for a 2nd pair Defense man.

MN and Tor don't make good trade partners. Neither really has what the other needs.

Um yes he is their 1C you can literally look up their lines. Hes played the entire season with Garlund and Hall (Schmaltz before Hall got there). Regardless of production they dont have the depth to replace him yntil Hayton can make the jump next year. Also Toronto is the highest scoring team in the league where Arizona sits towards the bottom so those numbers are skewed.

As for Liljegren. Arizona has Soderstrom who is better.

Because Adam Larson is worth Taylor Hall so if you want him it will cost you Mitch Marner #chiarellilogic

Edmonton says no, IMO. That's too rich for a bottom-6 player.

Larsson for Kerfoot, straight-up, seems to be an overly generous concession from Edmonton, quite unlikely actually. Kerfoot hasn't produced in Toronto like he did in Colorado, he's small, but his stats suggest he wins more face offs than he looses. I just can't see Holland moving a physical, right-handed, top-4, shut-down guy for a smallish 3C with question marks, especially if Puljujarvi is also part of the deal.

Kerfoot definitely not enough for both those players....agree with uphere.. even Kerfoot for Larsson is a stretch