SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

80 million compliance buyout challenge

Created by: Butlrr
Team: 2020-21 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 14, 2020
Published: Mar. 15, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Let’s assume the cap falls and teams are offered one compliance buyout like after the most recent lockout. Here’s a plan.
The team is better because:
1. no Tim Schaller
2. Didn’t re-sign Motte
3. Leivo and Gaudette, Leivo and Sutter, Roussel and Gaudette (no Virtanen), and Roussel and Sutter (no Beagle) were all parts of effective bottom six lines previously. I think there’s enough there to field two average to slightly below average third and fourth lines.
4. Mackenzie Weegar is a slight upgrade on Tanev at this point in their careers. Florida has a lot invested in Ekblad, Yandle, Matheson, and Strahlman and still have to replace Hoffman and Dadonov. They may be open to a trade.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,800,000
2$1,750,000
4$4,000,000
2$800,000
2$875,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,000,000
3$5,750,000
2$2,000,000
3$2,000,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2022 7th round pick (WPG)
WPG
  1. Eriksson, Loui
Additional Details:
This is a compliance buyout, not a trade.
2.
VAN
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie [RFA Rights]
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (COL)
FLA
  1. Virtanen, Jake [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the COL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WPG
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$80,000,000$80,260,211$1,700,000$4,000,000-$260,211
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$875,000$875,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,666$891,666 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,800,000$2,800,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 15, 2020 at 5:12 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
"slight"... Weegar has been better than Hughes this year...
Mar. 15, 2020 at 7:05 p.m.
#2
SENSAREELITE
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 205
Likes: 53
Quoting: AFOX10900
"slight"... Weegar has been better than Hughes this year...


CLOWN ALERT
Mar. 15, 2020 at 7:07 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: nobrainsensfan
CLOWN ALERT


And I reserve the right to laugh at each and every hate comment (I could also cite a bunch of different stats, and show a bunch of charts etc, but I really don't care to RN, and I highly doubt you're in the mood for charts and stats anyway)
Mar. 15, 2020 at 7:15 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,237
Likes: 19,507
Quoting: AFOX10900
And I reserve the right to laugh at each and every hate comment (I could also cite a bunch of different stats, and show a bunch of charts etc, but I really don't care to RN, and I highly doubt you're in the mood for charts and stats anyway)


I would like to see these charts. This is a pretty bold claim considering Hughes has a CF% + CF rel% of 58.7 and Weeger's is 52.7
Mar. 15, 2020 at 7:45 p.m.
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,100
Likes: 25,016
I like all of your ideas here, particularly the idea of going after MacKenzie Weegar. I hope you don't have to pay that much for Tyler Toffoli, but I'd like to see him stay with the Canucks.

Compliance buyouts for my two teams are easy: Anaheim: Backes; Los Angeles: Kovalchuk.
Butlrr liked this.
Mar. 15, 2020 at 10:12 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 93
Likes: 12
Quoting: AFOX10900
"slight"... Weegar has been better than Hughes this year...


Sorry, but having perused the same publicly available information, I don’t see it. Whatever preference you might have for Weegar at even strength gets wiped out by Hughes’ production on the power play.

I’m here for the argument that’s Weegar is much better than Tanev at this stage. I’m not sure how much of an impact that will make on goal prevention at the team level. Fixing the bottom six is a far bigger problem, which is what I was trying to get at by saying slight.
Mar. 15, 2020 at 10:52 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Butlrr
Sorry, but having perused the same publicly available information, I don’t see it. Whatever preference you might have for Weegar at even strength gets wiped out by Hughes’ production on the power play.

I’m here for the argument that’s Weegar is much better than Tanev at this stage. I’m not sure how much of an impact that will make on goal prevention at the team level. Fixing the bottom six is a far bigger problem, which is what I was trying to get at by saying slight.


Hughes is definitely the MUCH better PP guy, but given the same opportunity in the same system, with raw numbers it's really really hard to tell how much better Hughes really is, and 5v5 (which is what I base like 95% of my individual player evaluation on) Weegar is the better player, (comparing Weegar's RAPM charts from mid Jan to Hughes current charts at least)
Mar. 16, 2020 at 1:52 p.m.
#8
nucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 342
Likes: 126
"2. didn't resign Motte"
honestly, the Canucks have been 100% better with him on the team. definitely one of the better players lately after the Markstrom injury.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll