SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

ok we had our fun there is not gonna be a compliance buyout

Created by: hockeytor_15
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 24, 2020
Published: Mar. 24, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Ok we had our fun. just saying, a compliance buyout wouldn't make sense. It would just be giving free stuff to teams like Toronto, Boston and Vegas. Also it would just be giving a boost to teams with bad contracts (Loui Eriksson). If the cap is reduced. The player contracts will be reduced
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
27$81,500,000$96,271,866$0$0-$14,771,866
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,893,000$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:14 p.m.
#1
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
If the cap is reduced, player contracts will reduced? That’s not happening lol

If the cap doesn’t go up, a compliance buyout makes sense and it would help plenty of teams.
CD282 and mhockey91 liked this.
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:17 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,802
Likes: 3,228
NHLPA will not agree to lower contracts
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:28 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 243
Likes: 65
Quoting: Isles777
If the cap is reduced, player contracts will reduced? That’s not happening lol

If the cap doesn’t go up, a compliance buyout makes sense and it would help plenty of teams.


Quoting: papishark
NHLPA will not agree to lower contracts


Its happened before. Why can't they do it again. If you reduce the salary cap by 11%, you can reduce player salaries by 11%.
It just doesn't make sense and what other options does the league have if their losing money
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:36 p.m.
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,649
Likes: 26,367
Quoting: Isles777
If the cap is reduced, player contracts will reduced? That’s not happening lol

If the cap doesn’t go up, a compliance buyout makes sense and it would help plenty of teams.


I disagree with your characterization of "plenty." A buyout would ensconce Tampa Bay at the top of the Eastern Conference for the next 4 or 5 years (because they could use one and trade one) and help a few teams: Vancouver (Eriksson), Calgary (Lucic), Edmonton (Neal), Minnesota (Rask), Montreal (Alzner), the Islanders (Boychuk), Buffalo (Okposo), San Jose (take your pick) and maybe the Rangers (Smith, or Lundqvist if they want him to go), Winnipeg (Little?) and Columbus (Dubinsky?). That's fewer than half the teams in the League. A buyout would have little or no benefit for the other teams except indirectly (i.e., if they could accept a buyout candidate from another team, but there aren't many teams who have TWO buyout candidates).
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:37 p.m.
#5
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 35,078
Likes: 21,319
The NHLPA is either going to give buyouts, raise the cap slightly .1 maybe or will have to re negotiate to prevent a lockout cause with this pandemic whatever was agreed to in the past is probably void now
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:47 p.m.
#6
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I disagree with your characterization of "plenty." A buyout would ensconce Tampa Bay at the top of the Eastern Conference for the next 4 or 5 years (because they could use one and trade one) and help a few teams: Vancouver (Eriksson), Calgary (Lucic), Edmonton (Neal), Minnesota (Rask), Montreal (Alzner), the Islanders (Boychuk), Buffalo (Okposo), San Jose (take your pick) and maybe the Rangers (Smith, or Lundqvist if they want him to go), Winnipeg (Little?) and Columbus (Dubinsky?). That's fewer than half the teams in the League. A buyout would have little or no benefit for the other teams except indirectly (i.e., if they could accept a buyout candidate from another team, but there aren't many teams who have TWO buyout candidates).


Pittsburgh - Jack Johnston
Florida - Matheson , yandle , bobrovsky
Washington - Oshie , Jensen
Nashville - turris
Chicago - seabrook, maata ,
St. Louis - bozak
Carolina - staal
Flyers - voracek, JVR
Devils - subban
Red wings - Nielsen
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:52 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,283
Likes: 2,244
Quoting: Isles777
Pittsburgh - Jack Johnston
Florida - Matheson , yandle , bobrovsky
Washington - Oshie , Jensen
Nashville - turris
Chicago - seabrook, maata ,
St. Louis - bozak
Carolina - staal
Flyers - voracek, JVR
Devils - subban
Red wings - Nielsen


Lmao with the JVR and Bob contracts those shouldnt be able to count cuz they were just signed last year. Crazy how drastic a **** up can be in just 1 year
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:55 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,223
Likes: 3,642
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I disagree with your characterization of "plenty." A buyout would ensconce Tampa Bay at the top of the Eastern Conference for the next 4 or 5 years (because they could use one and trade one) and help a few teams: Vancouver (Eriksson), Calgary (Lucic), Edmonton (Neal), Minnesota (Rask), Montreal (Alzner), the Islanders (Boychuk), Buffalo (Okposo), San Jose (take your pick) and maybe the Rangers (Smith, or Lundqvist if they want him to go), Winnipeg (Little?) and Columbus (Dubinsky?). That's fewer than half the teams in the League. A buyout would have little or no benefit for the other teams except indirectly (i.e., if they could accept a buyout candidate from another team, but there aren't many teams who have TWO buyout candidates).


MN has plenty of cap space. They really don't need a compliance buyout now.

3-4 years ago they could have used one though. The cap hell of the flat caps screwed them then. The response from the league was basically "I guess you shouldn't have handed out all those big/dumb contracts, deal with it." CHI knows this better than anyone, they had to spend a lot of equity to stay cap compliant by dumping contracts on other teams.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:56 p.m.
#9
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: SlickWilly
Lmao with the JVR and Bob contracts those shouldnt be able to count cuz they were just signed last year. Crazy how drastic a **** up can be in just 1 year


I think FLA would buyout matheson/yandle over bob . JVR is still a solid player (he’s in year 2 of a 5 year deal) but he’s replaceable with the young players PHI has
Mar. 24, 2020 at 7:58 p.m.
#10
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,649
Likes: 26,367
Quoting: Isles777
Pittsburgh - Jack Johnston
Florida - Matheson , yandle , bobrovsky
Washington - Oshie , Jensen
Nashville - turris
Chicago - seabrook, maata ,
St. Louis - bozak
Carolina - staal
Flyers - voracek, JVR
Devils - subban
Red wings - Nielsen


I left out Chicago. You're right there.

The Florida GM can't buy Bobrovsky out. That's an open admission that he's capable of that bad a mistake. That's professional suicide.

Other teams at the bottom of the salary list don't have any pressure to move even big tickets, so they don't make the "help" list.

Most of the other guys you mention don't have that substantial an effect on their team, so the buyout doesn't help them significantly; in my mind, it's merely a nice plus factor.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll