SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2 Trades COL NSH MTL and a Compliance Buyout Good for up to 78 mil cap

Created by: Sagecoll
Team: 2020-21 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 23, 2020
Published: Mar. 25, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,850,000
2$1,450,000
2$1,850,000
3$2,150,000
3$3,850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
  2. Zadorov, Nikita [RFA Rights]
2.
NYR
    Compliance Buyout
    3.
    NYR
    1. Johansen, Ryan
    Additional Details:
    3 team trade.
    Trouba to Montreal
    Johansen to NYR
    Domi to Nashville.
    Buyouts
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the VAN
    2021
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    2022
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$78,000,000$73,088,966$0$9,212,500$4,911,034

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $11,642,857$11,642,857
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Nashville Predators
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
    RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,350,000$5,350,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LW, RW, C
    UFA - 1
    $2,150,000$2,150,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $1,450,000$1,450,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    LD
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,850,000$5,850,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
    G
    UFA - 1
    $3,850,000$3,850,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000
    RD
    RFA
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $1,850,000$1,850,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,700,000$5,700,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    $700,000$700,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 1:17 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    I dont think that package interests the Avs too much.
    Peronsally I would hate Strome as an addition, inflated offensive numbers playing top 6 minutes with Panarin, and hes not good defensively or on the PK, so hes not a 3C on a good team. I dont think hes worth the cost to get and what he would cost in his next contract

    If they do move Jost Zads, I would imagine it would be its for a quality not quantity return like you have proposed. They already have way too many guys fighting for roster spots, so adding 1 more in a 2 for 3 would create a bigger problem

    IMO, Buchnevich is the only guy I could see them targeting in a trade with the Rangers right now
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 1:24 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,537
    Likes: 6,692
    Wouldn't Nashville want Trouba to play behind Ellis, NYR want Domi for offense and MTL want Johansen for top line center? I don't think MTL would want Trouba, they're already set on the rightside.
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 1:37 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2020
    Posts: 1,140
    Likes: 387
    Edited Mar. 25, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
    Quoting: coga16
    I dont think that package interests the Avs too much.


    No, I think he overpaying, i mean you have a guy who a offense powerhouse in Ryan Strome, Someone who could brakeout in Filip Chytil, and a defense defensemen prospect in Libor Hájek, for a guy who a really good underrated defenseman and a guy who slightly better than Filip Chytil. overall, just trading Strome would be enough
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 1:39 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Quoting: F50marco
    Wouldn't Nashville want Trouba to play behind Ellis, NYR want Domi for offense and MTL want Johansen for top line center? I don't think MTL would want Trouba, they're already set on the rightside.


    I'd say that's one perspective but I don't agree with it. Petry is gone after next year, Weber is a candidate for a compliance buyout (if they're not smart enough to choose Price) and Brook is coming off a mediocre season in the AHL. Romonov plays LD and he's probably the only Dman in the system with high-end top 4 potential. Meanwhile, between Suzuki, KK, Poehling and Danault I'd argue that C is a strength for the Habs.

    Meanwhile, Nashville most likely views Fabbro as a top 4 staple behind Ellis and don't want to leave him hanging on the 3rd pair. And Domi has the ability to play LW as well which helps their lineup flexibility considering Duchene, Turris and Tomasino all playing C.

    For NYR, either Domi or Johansen works, it's a toss up really. They'd take either.
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 1:53 p.m.
    #5
    bang bang
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 1,195
    Likes: 351
    Quoting: coga16
    I dont think that package interests the Avs too much.
    Peronsally I would hate Strome as an addition, inflated offensive numbers playing top 6 minutes with Panarin, and hes not good defensively or on the PK, so hes not a 3C on a good team. I dont think hes worth the cost to get and what he would cost in his next contract

    If they do move Jost Zads, I would imagine it would be its for a quality not quantity return like you have proposed. They already have way too many guys fighting for roster spots, so adding 1 more in a 2 for 3 would create a bigger problem

    IMO, Buchnevich is the only guy I could see them targeting in a trade with the Rangers right now


    he's good defensively and on the PK stop just looking at stats and thinking you know what ur talking about
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 2:02 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Quoting: coga16
    I dont think that package interests the Avs too much.
    Peronsally I would hate Strome as an addition, inflated offensive numbers playing top 6 minutes with Panarin, and hes not good defensively or on the PK, so hes not a 3C on a good team. I dont think hes worth the cost to get and what he would cost in his next contract

    If they do move Jost Zads, I would imagine it would be its for a quality not quantity return like you have proposed. They already have way too many guys fighting for roster spots, so adding 1 more in a 2 for 3 would create a bigger problem

    IMO, Buchnevich is the only guy I could see them targeting in a trade with the Rangers right now


    This is a pretty lazy take I gotta say. Strome was at a 43 point pace last year as a 3rd line player with minimal PP time (well really the Rangers 3rd line last season would be Colorado's 4th line). Ryan Strome was on pace for about a 70 point season this year. That's the Panarin effect. With Panarin, Strome is basically Max Domi last year. And without Panarin, Strome is basically Max Domi this year. His defense will improve once he leaves the Rangers system, because Lindy Ruff's defensive system here in NY is terrible. You need only look at Kevin Shattenkirk and Neal Pionk to see some evidence of that.

    He's much better than you think. And he's >>>>>>Jost.
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 2:57 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: buchnevichh
    he's good defensively and on the PK stop just looking at stats and thinking you know what ur talking about


    when that was the exact assessment by other ranger fans who I have had this convo on the site about before, but sure im just being lazy when your own fan base agrees with that assessment
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 2:57 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    This is a pretty lazy take I gotta say. Strome was at a 43 point pace last year as a 3rd line player with minimal PP time (well really the Rangers 3rd line last season would be Colorado's 4th line). Ryan Strome was on pace for about a 70 point season this year. That's the Panarin effect. With Panarin, Strome is basically Max Domi last year. And without Panarin, Strome is basically Max Domi this year. His defense will improve once he leaves the Rangers system, because Lindy Ruff's defensive system here in NY is terrible. You need only look at Kevin Shattenkirk and Neal Pionk to see some evidence of that.

    He's much better than you think. And he's >>>>>>Jost.


    its not a lazy take, its a common take that even some ranger fans agree with, but to each their own,
    Jost isnt in the middle 6, so what does compare Strome to him mean? Strome isnt taking Jost spot in the middle 6.
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 5:57 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,537
    Likes: 6,692
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    I'd say that's one perspective but I don't agree with it. Petry is gone after next year, Weber is a candidate for a compliance buyout (if they're not smart enough to choose Price) and Brook is coming off a mediocre season in the AHL. Romonov plays LD and he's probably the only Dman in the system with high-end top 4 potential. Meanwhile, between Suzuki, KK, Poehling and Danault I'd argue that C is a strength for the Habs.

    Meanwhile, Nashville most likely views Fabbro as a top 4 staple behind Ellis and don't want to leave him hanging on the 3rd pair. And Domi has the ability to play LW as well which helps their lineup flexibility considering Duchene, Turris and Tomasino all playing C.

    For NYR, either Domi or Johansen works, it's a toss up really. They'd take either.


    From an outside perspective that's what you'd think but ask any Habs fan and they'd tell you they are perfectly happy with Weber and Price for the time being and moving them for nothing in return is not a viable option right now.. People often forget that in Montreal we don't have the luxury of signing free agents whenever we want so the idea of having to get rid of Price and Weber is unfounded. Both guys contracts will not hinder Montreal from anything in the future.

    As for Petry, the word around town is that MTL will probably resign him. The last TDL was the best time to trade him and they didn't budge. Either way Habs aren't going to trade for a RHD whilst their current ones are playing great.

    As for center depth, Danault is a top line center, Suzuki hasn't solidfied center yet, KK neither and Poehling is still trying to figure it out. Johansen could play center and move to the RW if needed.
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 7:29 p.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Quoting: F50marco
    From an outside perspective that's what you'd think but ask any Habs fan and they'd tell you they are perfectly happy with Weber and Price for the time being and moving them for nothing in return is not a viable option right now.. People often forget that in Montreal we don't have the luxury of signing free agents whenever we want so the idea of having to get rid of Price and Weber is unfounded. Both guys contracts will not hinder Montreal from anything in the future.

    As for Petry, the word around town is that MTL will probably resign him. The last TDL was the best time to trade him and they didn't budge. Either way Habs aren't going to trade for a RHD whilst their current ones are playing great.

    As for center depth, Danault is a top line center, Suzuki hasn't solidfied center yet, KK neither and Poehling is still trying to figure it out. Johansen could play center and move to the RW if needed.


    TBH, If Habs fans are totally fine with spending 30% of their cap on a goalie and 2 dmen all signed until they're about 40, well that's fine with me lol.
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 9:47 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,537
    Likes: 6,692
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    TBH, If Habs fans are totally fine with spending 30% of their cap on a goalie and 2 dmen all signed until they're about 40, well that's fine with me lol.


    As opposed to? Panarin, Hall and Pietrangelo?

    Even if the Habs created all this space by getting rid of all 3 players, who would they be spending this money on exactly? They're simply taking up space that would be occupied by anything anyway so there really isn't a problem.
    Mar. 25, 2020 at 10:18 p.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Quoting: F50marco
    As opposed to? Panarin, Hall and Pietrangelo?

    Even if the Habs created all this space by getting rid of all 3 players, who would they be spending this money on exactly? They're simply taking up space that would be occupied by anything anyway so there really isn't a problem.


    Is the question here what is the value of cap space if not to sign UFA's? I can't walk you through everything else you can do with the extra cap. But looking at how Carolina have transformed their roster over the last 3 years by utilizing their massive cap space and not really signing many UFA's at all should give you an idea.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll