SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Compliance buyout

Created by: BCAPP
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 27, 2020
Published: Mar. 27, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$4,850,000
3$1,250,000
2$2,250,000
5$4,000,000
2$750,000
Trades
1.
COL
  1. Boychuk, Johnny
  2. 2021 1st round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (COL)
2.
COL
    Not a trade to Winnipeg, just a buyout.
    3.
    LAK
    1. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
    2. Timmins, Conor
    3. 2020 1st round pick (COL)
    4.
    COL
    1. 2020 4th round pick (OTT)
    Additional Details:
    They need decent Dmen, he makes 3 million, with cap hit of 4.25, exactly what Melnyk likes. He can probably be flipped at the deadline for more than a 4th
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the COL
    2021
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    2022
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the COL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$81,500,000$79,743,095$0$5,425,000$1,756,905
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $5,571,429$5,571,429
    LW, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $6,300,000$6,300,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $9,250,000$9,250,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,850,000$4,850,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $2,850,000$2,850,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
    RW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $3,333,333$3,333,333
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    LD/RD
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $750,000$750,000
    C
    RFA

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 3:54 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 10,305
    Likes: 3,986
    This build makes bringing back Makar and Landeskog almost impossible.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:31 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,381
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Wqrrior
    This build makes bringing back Makar and Landeskog almost impossible.


    I don't see Makar being an issue, and I would not bring back Landeskog. Don't sign UFA wingers for big money. Almost always a mistake.

    Calvert/Bellemaire and Nichuskin can all be let to walk and replace with cheaper options (they have some good prospects coming up.

    Can certainly move Zadorov if he's that low in your line up.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:32 p.m.
    #3
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 5,081
    Likes: 1,433
    This is pure hot trash! Kopitar is a futur hall of fame, you won’t land him with Jost who is hot garbage and Timmins who is a good prospect but clearly not a elite level like Kopitar is. A late first round pick make that even more ridiculous.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:35 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,381
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Sebybbq
    This is pure hot trash! Kopitar is a futur hall of fame, you won’t land him with Jost who is hot garbage and Timmins who is a good prospect but clearly not a elite level like Kopitar is. A late first round pick make that even more ridiculous.


    Anyone who is paying more for a 32 year old who is already peaked and still owed 10 million dollars for a few years is making a mistake. Its like you thinking Price is going to continue to be the hall of famer he has been previously.
    JeffW liked this.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:37 p.m.
    #5
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,316
    Likes: 3,328
    Dont think LA does it, likely has another team out bid that offer.

    If it did happen though you wouldn't be able to keep your depth, let alone having resign Makar, Mckinnon and eventually Byram before the end of Kopitars contract. Not a good plan looking 3 years down the road.
    Pharow liked this.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:45 p.m.
    #6
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 5,081
    Likes: 1,433
    Quoting: BCAPP
    Anyone who is paying more for a 32 year old who is already peaked and still owed 10 million dollars for a few years is making a mistake. Its like you thinking Price is going to continue to be the hall of famer he has been previously.


    What Carey Price have to do with That bullshat trade? We are talking about Anze Kopitar You have some big issues. The fact that this is a terrible trade is on you and no one else.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:46 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,381
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Subbanator7667
    Dont think LA does it, likely has another team out bid that offer.

    If it did happen though you wouldn't be able to keep your depth, let alone having resign Makar, Mckinnon and eventually Byram before the end of Kopitars contract. Not a good plan looking 3 years down the road.


    I just made another team https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/318141&post_id=1347325

    Their cap is so beautifully built they can.

    They can also afford to pay more, but honestly he isn't worth more than that at 32. I'm not an Avs fan nor Kings fan
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:47 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,381
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Sebybbq
    What Carey Price have to do with That bullshat trade? We are talking about Anze Kopitar You have some big issues. The fact that this is a terrible trade is on you and no one else.


    What Carey Price has to do with this, is I had a conversation with you a month or two back and you didn't seem to understand that he is likely declining. Apparently the same thing here. You don't seem to understand that players get worse with age after a certain point. This isn't a trade for a 27 year old Kopitar. Its a trade for a 32 year old Kopitar.

    LA should most certainly be looking to trade Kopitar and Doughty. Trading those two could literally finish there time in rebuild, and put them into growing young team.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:53 p.m.
    #9
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 5,081
    Likes: 1,433
    Quoting: BCAPP
    What Carey Price has to do with this, is I had a conversation with you a month or two back and you didn't seem to understand that he is likely declining. Apparently the same thing here. You don't seem to understand that players get worse with age after a certain point. This isn't a trade for a 27 year old Kopitar. Its a trade for a 32 year old Kopitar.

    LA should most certainly be looking to trade Kopitar and Doughty. Trading those two could literally finish there time in rebuild, and put them into growing young team.


    Man you have serious issues. That have nothing to do with Carey Price. The only problem here is you always make terrible trade proposal that only benefit Colorado. This is the only thing that happen here. This have nothing to do with players age, the concern is that you have absolutely no understanding of trade value. Colorado are mainly advantages in all of your bullshat trade proposal and the team that trade the best players received most often trash can like Jost who hold value of a bordeline third line players.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:54 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: BCAPP
    I don't see Makar being an issue, and I would not bring back Landeskog. Don't sign UFA wingers for big money. Almost always a mistake.

    Calvert/Bellemaire and Nichuskin can all be let to walk and replace with cheaper options (they have some good prospects coming up.

    Can certainly move Zadorov if he's that low in your line up.


    you bring back Landeskog 10 times out of 10, Hes not goign to break the bank and his impact to the locker room, the teams identity and community are just as important to what he brings to the ice, which is still highly valuable. The guy has been a 20 goal scorer his basically almost his entire NHL career. Dont have over think this one.
    JeffW liked this.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 4:59 p.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,381
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: Sebybbq
    Man you have serious issues. That have nothing to do with Carey Price. The only problem here is you always make terrible trade proposal that only benefit Colorado. This is the only thing that happen here. This have nothing to do with players age, the concern is that you have absolutely no understanding of trade value. Colorado are mainly advantages in all of your bullshat trade proposal and the team that trade the best players received most often trash can like Jost who hold value of a bordeline third line players.


    I am a Leafs fan and haven't made a Colorado post we've discussed on before... That was made by someone else. I've never made a Colorado post with a major trade before to my memory... Good try though
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 5:01 p.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 9,381
    Likes: 3,695
    Quoting: coga16
    you bring back Landeskog 10 times out of 10, Hes not goign to break the bank and his impact to the locker room, the teams identity and community are just as important to what he brings to the ice, which is still highly valuable. The guy has been a 20 goal scorer his basically almost his entire NHL career. Dont have over think this one.


    The vast, vast, vast majority of time signing UFA wingers to 5+ year contracts is a mistake. Even worse for physical wingers. Ladd, Erricson, Lucic, Okposo, JvR, etc, etc. Wingers don't age well.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 5:03 p.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 20,030
    Likes: 12,187
    Quoting: BCAPP
    The vast, vast, vast majority of time signing UFA wingers to 5+ year contracts is a mistake. Even worse for physical wingers. Ladd, Erricson, Lucic, Okposo, JvR, etc, etc. Wingers don't age well.


    doesnt matter, Landeskog is the heart and soul of the team. They keep him as long as he wants to be on the Avs
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 5:13 p.m.
    #14
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 19,215
    Likes: 4,837
    No way I would trade for Kopitar. He's gonna be 33, trading for a guy who's making 10 million through his 36 year old season. No thanks.
    I mean just look at the stats for the last 4 years. There is one year in there where he looks to be worth that 10 million cap hit. Everything else is far less.
    Truth is he's a contract from a different time. The game was slower then.
    He's still a decent player, but as the game got faster he's looked worse. No way I take that huge cap hit on.
    BCAPP liked this.
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 5:54 p.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 1,351
    Likes: 445
    Quoting: BCAPP
    I don't see Makar being an issue, and I would not bring back Landeskog. Don't sign UFA wingers for big money. Almost always a mistake.

    Calvert/Bellemaire and Nichuskin can all be let to walk and replace with cheaper options (they have some good prospects coming up.

    Can certainly move Zadorov if he's that low in your line up.


    can't see them letting Landeskog go. Just look at the Sharks after they lost the "heart and soul" of the team in Joe Pavelski
    Mar. 27, 2020 at 6:03 p.m.
    #16
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,316
    Likes: 3,328
    Quoting: BCAPP
    I just made another team https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/318141&post_id=1347325

    Their cap is so beautifully built they can.

    They can also afford to pay more, but honestly he isn't worth more than that at 32. I'm not an Avs fan nor Kings fan


    It would be tight but would depend on Byrams rookie production and if Makar gets Chabot money.

    Ow I dont think he is really worth more but there would be an NHL gm that would cough up something better. LA would also want to target a team that the 1st rounder they get may be one that has a Matt Duchene, Erik Karlsson bounce to it and end up with a lottery pick.
    BCAPP liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll