Forums/Armchair-GM

dallas modified

Created by: jertremblay17
Initial Creation Date: Apr 3, 2020
Published: Apr 3 at 11:50 pm
Team: 2020-21 Dallas Stars
Team Explanation
maybe some questonable moves but still very solid
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
Hintz, Roope2$3,000,000
Faksa, Radek3$2,500,000
Cirelli, Anthony4$6,000,000
Gurianov, Denis2$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Janmark, Mattias2$1,900,000
Khudobin, Anton1$3,000,000
Perry, Corey1$1,500,000
Sekera, Andrej1$1,500,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Cirelli, Anthony$6,000,000
2021 1st round pick
2021 3rd round pick
Trades
DAL
  1. Heinen, Danton
ANA
  1. Janmark, Mattias
  2. 2020 6th round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. 2020 4th round pick (EDM)
DET
  1. Comeau, Blake
Buyouts
  • Valeri Nichushkin: $450,000
DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
2020
DAL
DAL
EDM
DAL
BUF
2021
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
2022
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES BONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$83,673,332$0$2,500,000-$173,332

Roster

Left WingCenterRight Wing
DAL
Benn, Jamie
$9,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
DAL
Seguin, Tyler
$9,850,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
DAL
Radulov, Alexander
$6,250,000
RW
NMC NTC
UFA - 2
DAL
Hintz, Roope
$3,000,000
C, LW
RFA
Cirelli, Anthony
$6,000,000
C
RFA
DAL
Gurianov, Denis
$3,000,000
LW
RFA
ANA
Heinen, Danton
$2,800,000
C, LW, RW
RFA - 1
DAL
Faksa, Radek
$2,500,000
C
RFA
DAL
Pavelski, Joe
$7,000,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
DAL
Cogliano, Andrew
$3,250,000
LW, RW, C
NTC
UFA - 1
DAL
Dickinson, Jason
$1,500,000
C
RFA - 1
DAL
Perry, Corey
$1,500,000
RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
DAL
Lindell, Esa
$5,800,000
LD
UFA - 5
DAL
Klingberg, John
$4,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
DAL
Bishop, Ben
$4,916,666
G
NMC NTC
UFA - 3
DAL
Oleksiak, Jamie
$2,137,500
LD
UFA - 1
DAL
Johns, Stephen
$2,350,000
RD
UFA - 1
DAL
Khudobin, Anton
$3,000,000
G
UFA
DAL
Heiskanen, Miro
$894,166
LD
RFA - 1
DAL
Sekera, Andrej
$1,500,000
LD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
DAL
Dowling, Justin
$750,000
C
UFA - 1
DAL
Fedun, Taylor
$737,500
RD
UFA - 1
DAL
Kero, Tanner
$737,500
C
UFA - 1

Special Teams

Power Play 1
Benn, J.
Seguin, T.
Radulov, A.
Pavelski, J.
Klingberg, J.
Power Play 2
Perry, C.
Hintz, R.
Cirelli, A.
Heinen, D.
Heiskanen, M.
Penalty Kill 1
Benn, J.
Hintz, R.
Klingberg, J.
Lindell, E.
Penalty Kill 2
Cogliano, A.
Faksa, R.
Oleksiak, J.
Heiskanen, M.

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr 4 at 12:24
#1
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 10,573
Likes: 4,654
No point in signing Cirelli for 4 years (which carries him to unrestricted free agency) rather than 5 since the compensation remains the same.

We'll wait and see what we got in Heinen -- no need to move him after less than 10 games.
Apr 4 at 12:47
#2
Go Sharks Go
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 685
Likes: 199
Anaheim would just sign Janmark and not give up Heinen
TheMooterus and OldNYIfan liked this.
Apr 4 at 11:58
#3
Thread Starter
Stanstead
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 62
Likes: 2
Quoting: JumboJoe
Anaheim would just sign Janmark and not give up Heinen


no, because Heinen isn't a good fit for them and janmark could potentially be a great fit for them and Heinen a great one for Dallas
Apr 5 at 12:00
#4
Thread Starter
Stanstead
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 62
Likes: 2
Quoting: OldNYIfan
No point in signing Cirelli for 4 years (which carries him to unrestricted free agency) rather than 5 since the compensation remains the same.

We'll wait and see what we got in Heinen -- no need to move him after less than 10 games.


how is there no point in signing cirelli, he is among best defensive forward talks and will get a big contract
Apr 5 at 12:56
#5
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 10,573
Likes: 4,654
Quoting: jertremblay17
how is there no point in signing cirelli, he is among best defensive forward [talks][?] and will get a big contract


Is this a language problem? I didn't say that there was no point in signing Cirelli; I said that there was no point in signing him for 4 years instead of 5. Let me try it again a different way: signing Cirelli is a good idea, but you should sign him for 5 years, not 4. Signing him for only 4 years lets him go directly to free agency.

I don't think that your purposely mis-stating what I said; I have the feeling that my meaning isn't getting across to you, perhaps because English is not your first language. That's okay; if you were writing in French, I would have difficulty understanding every nuance of what you were trying to express.
Apr 5 at 1:21
#6
Thread Starter
Stanstead
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 62
Likes: 2
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Is this a language problem? I didn't say that there was no point in signing Cirelli; I said that there was no point in signing him for 4 years instead of 5. Let me try it again a different way: signing Cirelli is a good idea, but you should sign him for 5 years, not 4. Signing him for only 4 years lets him go directly to free agency.

I don't think that your purposely mis-stating what I said; I have the feeling that my meaning isn't getting across to you, perhaps because English is not your first language. That's okay; if you were writing in French, I would have difficulty understanding every nuance of what you were trying to express.


ok I agree with you with the Cirelli signing but don't come out here as an old guy who thinks knows everything about the sport and all the players, when u build a team, u cant just have offensive forwards and some offensive defensemen, you need some balance and you have to pay those players at the right price. you argue every single decision I do and every single trade, instead of just arguing, look at it first, and analyze it so you understand where I'm getting the ideas from, unless your some scout for a NHL team, I don't see how your opinions are better and that my trades and signings are bad.
Apr 5 at 1:23
#7
Go Sharks Go
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 685
Likes: 199
Quoting: jertremblay17
no, because Heinen isn't a good fit for them and janmark could potentially be a great fit for them and Heinen a great one for Dallas


Yeah but why wouldn't Anaheim just sign Janmark in free agency and not give anything up
Apr 5 at 1:30
#8
Thread Starter
Stanstead
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 62
Likes: 2
Quoting: JumboJoe
Yeah but why wouldn't Anaheim just sign Janmark in free agency and not give anything up


they will eventually get problems with cap space and players will want a trade because of their playing time and also they don't need two players who both look similar.
Apr 5 at 12:15
#9
First NY Then LA
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 10,573
Likes: 4,654
Quoting: jertremblay17
ok I agree with you with the Cirelli signing but don't come out here as an old guy who thinks knows everything about the sport and all the players, when u build a team, u cant just have offensive forwards and some offensive defensemen, you need some balance and you have to pay those players at the right price. you argue every single decision I do and every single trade, instead of just arguing, look at it first, and analyze it so you understand where I'm getting the ideas from, unless your some scout for a NHL team, I don't see how your opinions are better and that my trades and signings are bad.


(1) I don't begin to think that I know everything about the sport, let alone pretend to; I do know more than most about my four favorite teams (my two local teams, the Islanders and Toronto) and limit my comments on other teams to what I think is generally accepted wisdom.

(2) The statement that I argue every single decision and every trade you do is demonstrably and objectively false; I've commented on only two of the 11 teams you've posted so far, and my comment regarding this Dallas team cannot be construed as negative by even the most sensitive flower because all I did was point out the advantage of signing Cirelli for 5 years instead of 4. Over-reaching statements like that make you sound as if you can't stand any differing, let alone opposing, viewpoint, which implies a rather narrow mind.

(3) Opinions of people who have followed the sport for more than 40 years are generally given more weight than the opinions of less experienced fans. That's just natural, because the a priori expectation is that the voice of experience is more likely to be right than the voice of inexperience. The principle is true not just in hockey fandom but life at large, so you had better get used to it. Your only defense is to become knowledgeable yourself, which can only be achieved with an open mind. And here's something that may not have occurred to you: the one thing that all my experience has taught me is that I can be wrong, and others can be right, about anything.
Apr 5 at 1:02
#10
Go Sharks Go
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 685
Likes: 199
Quoting: jertremblay17
they will eventually get problems with cap space and players will want a trade because of their playing time and also they don't need two players who both look similar.


Then they could just trade Heinen for a decent pick
Apr 6 at 12:12
#11
Thread Starter
Stanstead
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 62
Likes: 2
Quoting: OldNYIfan
(1) I don't begin to think that I know everything about the sport, let alone pretend to; I do know more than most about my four favorite teams (my two local teams, the Islanders and Toronto) and limit my comments on other teams to what I think is generally accepted wisdom.

(2) The statement that I argue every single decision and every trade you do is demonstrably and objectively false; I've commented on only two of the 11 teams you've posted so far, and my comment regarding this Dallas team cannot be construed as negative by even the most sensitive flower because all I did was point out the advantage of signing Cirelli for 5 years instead of 4. Over-reaching statements like that make you sound as if you can't stand any differing, let alone opposing, viewpoint, which implies a rather narrow mind.

(3) Opinions of people who have followed the sport for more than 40 years are generally given more weight than the opinions of less experienced fans. That's just natural, because the a priori expectation is that the voice of experience is more likely to be right than the voice of inexperience. The principle is true not just in hockey fandom but life at large, so you had better get used to it. Your only defense is to become knowledgeable yourself, which can only be achieved with an open mind. And here's something that may not have occurred to you: the one thing that all my experience has taught me is that I can be wrong, and others can be right, about anything.



i told you that you were right about the cirelli signing but i think your a bit too old and that the game has changed
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Remove Option
Submit Poll