SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

stop making johnsson deals unless they are TDL trades

Created by: AJM2466
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 5, 2020
Published: Apr. 5, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
he big hurt rn. just sayin
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
27$81,500,000$96,271,866$0$0-$14,771,866
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,893,000$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 5, 2020 at 2:44 p.m.
#1
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 9,207
Likes: 5,572
He is expected to be ready for camp
Apr. 5, 2020 at 2:48 p.m.
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
He's the most likely to leave to be fair.

It's not like TOR could afford to keep him if they want to re-sign Dermott and Mikheyev etc.
palhal liked this.
Apr. 5, 2020 at 2:49 p.m.
#3
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,698
Likes: 20,871
Quoting: justaBoss
He's the most likely to leave to be fair.


yep, kerfoot is a close second, and Dermott is third due to our Left defense depth
Apr. 5, 2020 at 2:55 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,579
Likes: 7,353
Quoting: justaBoss
He's the most likely to leave to be fair.

It's not like TOR could afford to keep him if they want to re-sign Dermott and Mikheyev etc.


Not true at all,the leafs are weaker at LW than they are at RW. Makes more sense to move kapanen if youre going to move anyone
Apr. 5, 2020 at 2:58 p.m.
#5
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Not true at all,the leafs are weaker at LW than they are at RW. Makes more sense to move kapanen if youre going to move anyone


Just move Marner for a elite d-man and TOR could keep both Johnsson and Kappy
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:09 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Stop telling people what to do
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:24 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 696
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Not true at all,the leafs are weaker at LW than they are at RW. Makes more sense to move kapanen if youre going to move anyone


Ok, but Kapanen is the better player and brings more to the team than Johnsson. On left you’ll have Korshkov, Robertson, Hyman, Mikheyev, possibly Clifford. There is no need to have a blue line where everyone is paid 3mill+ and Johnsson is expendable, aswell as the aforementioned Kerfoot and Dermott.
justaBoss liked this.
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:33 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,579
Likes: 7,353
Quoting: MMXD
Ok, but Kapanen is the better player and brings more to the team than Johnsson. On left you’ll have Korshkov, Robertson, Hyman, Mikheyev, possibly Clifford. There is no need to have a blue line where everyone is paid 3mill+ and Johnsson is expendable, aswell as the aforementioned Kerfoot and Dermott.


So, what makes more sense to you, trade the less needed, higher valued guy for a better trade return or rely on a guy with less than 40 game in the nhl coming off a potentially worse injury to be your 2LW?
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:33 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,579
Likes: 7,353
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Just move Marner for a elite d-man and TOR could keep both Johnsson and Kappy


Cool, when that happens we'll be alright!
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:36 p.m.
#10
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Not true at all,the leafs are weaker at LW than they are at RW. Makes more sense to move kapanen if youre going to move anyone


Kappy's better. I'd much rather keep him than Mango
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:37 p.m.
#11
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Just move Marner for a elite d-man and TOR could keep both Johnsson and Kappy


Or keep the potentially 100 point winger and move the third liners.
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:44 p.m.
#12
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
Quoting: justaBoss
Or keep the potentially 100 point winger and move the third liners.



So you won't get a top 2 d-man because:
1-not enough cap room
2-not enough value in a trade


Look at every cup winners since like 2010, 2 of their 5 key players were d-men

2010: KEITH, Kane, Toews, Hossa, SEABROOK
2011: CHARA, Bergeron, SEIDENBERG, Thomas and another forward
2012: DOUGHTY, VOYNOV, Quick, Kopitar and Carter
2013: KEITH, SEABROOK, Kane, Crawford and Toews
2014: DOUGHTY, VOYNOV, Kopitar, Quick and Carter
2015: KEITH, SEABROOK, Toews, Kane and Crawford
2016 and 2017: exceptions, only one of the 5 was a d-man, but this is possible when you've got Crosby
2018: CARLSON, ORLOV, Holtby, OVI and Kuz
2019: PIETRANGELO, PARAYKO, ROR, Tarasenko and Binnington



Look, TOR needs to realize that they're not doing things the proper way. They have no Crosby or anyone even remotely close to him. They have to get another d-man asap and the only way to free up enough cap room to acquire that d-man and keep a nice depth and to have enough trade value is Marner
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:44 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,579
Likes: 7,353
Quoting: justaBoss
Kappy's better. I'd much rather keep him than Mango


Id rather keep both of them than trade one for as hilariously little as these proposals suggest and then hope like hell mikheyev is 2nd liner with no fall back plan
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:44 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 316
Likes: 75
Quoting: Bf3351
Stop telling people what to do


hes not movable with his injury. when he gets back on the ice and produces he can be moved but his value atm would not be worth trading over the summer.
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:50 p.m.
#15
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Id rather keep both of them than trade one for as hilariously little as these proposals suggest and then hope like hell mikheyev is 2nd liner with no fall back plan


At the end of the day TOR can't afford to keep all of them. I'm almost certain one of Johnsson, Kerfoot and Kapanen is moving. Personally I'd move Johnsson.

The team is built in very weird way. They've invested so much in their TOP-4 forwards it's inevitable that they're going to be compromised behind them...

Also why should teams pay top price for a mid-6 winger(s)?
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:54 p.m.
#16
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
So you won't get a top 2 d-man because:
1-not enough cap room
2-not enough value in a trade


Look at every cup winners since like 2010, 2 of their 5 key players were d-men

2010: KEITH, Kane, Toews, Hossa, SEABROOK
2011: CHARA, Bergeron, SEIDENBERG, Thomas and another forward
2012: DOUGHTY, VOYNOV, Quick, Kopitar and Carter
2013: KEITH, SEABROOK, Kane, Crawford and Toews
2014: DOUGHTY, VOYNOV, Kopitar, Quick and Carter
2015: KEITH, SEABROOK, Toews, Kane and Crawford
2016 and 2017: exceptions, only one of the 5 was a d-man, but this is possible when you've got Crosby
2018: CARLSON, ORLOV, Holtby, OVI and Kuz
2019: PIETRANGELO, PARAYKO, ROR, Tarasenko and Binnington



Look, TOR needs to realize that they're not doing things the proper way. They have no Crosby or anyone even remotely close to him. They have to get another d-man asap and the only way to free up enough cap room to acquire that d-man and keep a nice depth and to have enough trade value is Marner


By your logic, let me ask then - what team would move their leading top level D-man for Marner?
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:56 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,579
Likes: 7,353
Quoting: justaBoss
At the end of the day TOR can't afford to keep all of them. I'm almost certain one of Johnsson, Kerfoot and Kapanen is moving. Personally I'd move Johnsson.

The team is built in very weird way. They've invested so much in their TOP-4 forwards it's inevitable that they're going to be compromised behind them...

Also why should teams pay top price for a mid-6 winger(s)?


The leafs may have to move one, we dont know yet. We literally have no idea what is going to happen league or cap wisedor even the playoffs or draft, let alone free agency or next season.
And if the leafs do have to move one they can do more things than just use the one fans like less right now as a cap dump.
Amd teams dont need to pay top price, they simply need to actually give up value comparable to the value they are getting.
Apr. 5, 2020 at 3:57 p.m.
#18
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
The leafs may have to move one, we dont know yet. We literally have no idea what is going to happen league or cap wisedor even the playoffs or draft, let alone free agency or next season.
And if the leafs do have to move one they can do more things than just use the one fans like less right now as a cap dump.
Amd teams dont need to pay top price, they simply need to actually give up value comparable to the value they are getting.


Pray tell, what would you consider as suitable value for Kappy or Johnsson?
Apr. 5, 2020 at 4:01 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,579
Likes: 7,353
Quoting: justaBoss
Pray tell, what would you consider as suitable value for Kappy or Johnsson?


In a vacuum disregarding needs and salary and assuming minimum value?
Johnsson- early 3rd (pick in the 60s) and a high ceiling B level prospect
Kapanen- a youngish number 4 defender
Apr. 5, 2020 at 4:03 p.m.
#20
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
In a vacuum disregarding needs and salary and assuming minimum value?
Johnsson- early 3rd (pick in the 60s) and a high ceiling B level prospect
Kapanen- a youngish number 4 defender


Cool. I'd probably give a 2nd for Johnsson. TOP4 D for Kappy seems fair.
Apr. 5, 2020 at 4:38 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 696
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
So, what makes more sense to you, trade the less needed, higher valued guy for a better trade return or rely on a guy with less than 40 game in the nhl coming off a potentially worse injury to be your 2LW?


So what, you want the other guy who missed half the season to injuries? Even before the injuries, Mikheyev had been better and will be cheaper. Cap bud. You can easily package up a few players for something more instead of moving one of your better players. Kapanen can both score, skate and has proven that he has no issues with scrapping. Not a player you wanna move
Apr. 5, 2020 at 5:05 p.m.
#22
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
Quoting: justaBoss
By your logic, let me ask then - what team would move their leading top level D-man for Marner?


CAR if they can't agree on a new contract for Hamilton
Apr. 5, 2020 at 5:37 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,579
Likes: 7,353
Quoting: MMXD
So what, you want the other guy who missed half the season to injuries? Even before the injuries, Mikheyev had been better and will be cheaper. Cap bud. You can easily package up a few players for something more instead of moving one of your better players. Kapanen can both score, skate and has proven that he has no issues with scrapping. Not a player you wanna move


Amazing, you just described johnsson too! Except he didnt just come off a bunch of good games at the end of the season, so fans have flip flopped on him again.
Kapanen has gone from first liner to trade the bum to 'a guy you dont trade ' and back about 10x since hes been a leaf, but people seem to forget that.
As far as mikheyek goes, the dude literarily had his arm sliced to hell and hasnt played a game since and his 39 game season includes a couple big pdo benders, but sure johnson who is hurt and is a proven 20 goal guy etc and can skate and is feisty as hell and is decent defensively oh, he had a bad pdo streak where no one was scoring then got hurt, trade the bum!
You see how this works, bud?
Apr. 5, 2020 at 5:47 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 696
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Amazing, you just described johnsson too! Except he didnt just come off a bunch of good games at the end of the season, so fans have flip flopped on him again.
Kapanen has gone from first liner to trade the bum to 'a guy you dont trade ' and back about 10x since hes been a leaf, but people seem to forget that.
As far as mikheyek goes, the dude literarily had his arm sliced to hell and hasnt played a game since and his 39 game season includes a couple big pdo benders, but sure johnson who is hurt and is a proven 20 goal guy etc and can skate and is feisty as hell and is decent defensively oh, he had a bad pdo streak where no one was scoring then got hurt, trade the bum!
You see how this works, bud?


No, trade him for a ****ing player you need more. It lessens your cap and you keep the better damn player smfh
Apr. 5, 2020 at 5:51 p.m.
#25
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,424
Likes: 22,636
Quoting: justaBoss
At the end of the day TOR can't afford to keep all of them. I'm almost certain one of Johnsson, Kerfoot and Kapanen is moving. Personally I'd move Johnsson.

The team is built in very weird way. They've invested so much in their TOP-4 forwards it's inevitable that they're going to be compromised behind them...

Also why should teams pay top price for a mid-6 winger(s)?


The Leafs don't have much cap problems as some other teams. Somehow on CapFriendly, it's only the Leafs that cap problems. What will be cap in 2020/21 even if the season if played? Based on 2019/20 revenues maybe the should be 70m. Obviously the owners and NHLPA have to work a solution.
There are just so many teams near the cap, the buyers can drive a hard bargain. If the Leaf need cap and want to spend on money on Dman, "giving" a player Johnsson away might be the only option. And the Leafs won't be only team trying to give away players.
justaBoss liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll