Leafs don't want that atrocious contract.

Mathews is worth way more, and as good as burns is he has little value with his age and contract

Leafs don't want to touch that contract with a ten foot pole.

hahahah terrible trade for the Leafs

If that offer doesn't work, you can try Karlsson, Hertl and two firsts for Tavares.

No

How about karlsson and a 1st for One of the Tavares Matthews or Marner contracts?
Open to negotiate but we’re not sending 2 1st a great D on. A terrible contract and a stud top 6 center on a good contract for one great forward on a terrible contract.

Look up Poe's Theorem.

We know, that's why they're trading it to San Jose.

I’m talking about burns... matthews is fine

That’s such an easy no.

Burns is already up there in age, it would be more likely that they take a guy like Kane or Couture rather than Burns and look somewhere else for Defense, and the Tampa Bay pick is basically like second so not really worth a lot, and the 2021 First with Matthews going there I would assume that would also be more like a second so it’s not really that valuable compared to Matthews. They could get a lot more out of a deal from another team.

On this website I can never tell joke from seriousness

Lmao, nice one. That's the first thing that's made me laugh on this site in while. Other than stupidity, but that's a different kind of laughter.

Only reason the Leafs would trade Matthews (or Marner) is player good value or cap relief. Burns isn't good value now at 8m and certainly won't be in the future. Lebanc had a good season two years, but not last year. Leafs right now have three superior RWers than Lebanc.
Folks think (and maybe with reason) the Leafs have overspent 40.5m invested in their top 4 forwards. But it' pathetic that the Sharks 26.5m in three aging Dmen, EK, Burns and Vlasic plus 9m in Couture....all with NTC or NMC.. That't's not going to age well.

If burns was 28,