Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
Who were the other guys that you found? I didn't go through all the teams; the guys that I named were just off the top.
Now, hold on. I never said that he was not an upgrade. I said he was overpaid and the acquisition cost is likely more than he is worth. I wouldn't necessarily call myself an analytics guy. Analytics is a broad term, some are more useful than others. It's about the numbers, yes, but you also have to take into account the context of the numbers, and use the eye test. IMO Ceci is a great example of this; He has pretty decent xGA stats this season, but even if he is okay for 99% of a game, his one **** up is royal. Having said that, yes, I am against Lindell in large part because of his numbers.
I really don't feel like doing that because what I would do has so many variables that are just impossible to predict and I'm sure we'd get stuck debating meaningless stuff.
A general outline would be to not look to upgrade at all really. I'm doing a 1 step back, two steps forward approach. I don't think there are any improvements that this team can make right now to truly make themselves competitive. Squeak into a wildcard, maybe, but no real damage. If it's me, I'm selling off UFA's (mayne keep one. Danault?), but let them negotiate contracts first if I can to boost the return. Tatar just had a career year, sell high. I'm recouping picks/prospects and gearing up HARD to make a run in a few years. Let's face it with the Boston's and Tampa's and Toronto's and Washington's of the world, this just isn't Montreal's time. But if I can hit on some picks and develop the guys that I have, in 3-5 years when Boston and Tampa and Washington are a little aged out and Matthews' contract is up... Oh boy, you better look out.
So the guys I've narrowed down that fit enough of the criteria that a trade could work are: Lindell, Leddy, Skjei, Matheson, R Murray, Gostisbehere, Brodin and Zadorov. (These guys all have varying levels of costs however so not all will cost the same in my mind)
I feel "overpaid" and more than he is "worth" can be misleading terminology. How much exactly? 500K or 3M because paying a guy 500K more than he is worth is no skin off my back. Sure he could very well be overpaid a little. 4.5M is probably more reasonable but how often are players paid exactly what they are worth and those players generally are not traded as a result so your kind of stuck choosing the rest of them. No one is trading a 25 year old John Tavares while he was making only 5.5M ...... That's why I ask for you to give me some better options because I've exhausted all options and based on what I know, mixed with what I would be willing to pay for a player, I don't think there are many better options available. By the way, even though I was technically right about it, I didn't mean analytics guy in a negative way but i feel the guys who are too far to that extreme in analytics are no different than the guys who are defending guys like Ceci....... I think the eye test and analytics match up pretty damn evenly on Ceci. He just plain sucks. I feel like Lindell's numbers may be tainting your opinion of him more than reality and maybe I think he is better than he actually is granted, both of us being a little more modest still leaves us with a pretty darn good player. One that will cost no more of an over pay than any of the other players the Habs could potentially get.
I feel like saying "Stay away from Lindell and that contract." without giving better options or showing a solution is empty advice. So I need to see what you are seeing. If Lindell is not worth the cost and cap hit, who is and are they realistic options I should be going after instead? Prove it to us by putting yourself out there and let the CF community see if they agree.
Now,
IF I WAS GM, I would blow this team up. All pending UFA's gone for picks and prospects and rebuilding the right way. The reality is, this ownership does not want that. They want this team to make the playoffs while not completely going all in
a la Columbus last post season because they know they aren't good enough to do so yet.. So I'm attacking this from the point of view of being hired as the GM of the Habs and that I have been given objectives to attain that are aligned with the reality of the team's current goals. Not that I have free roam to do whatever I want and build the team 100% the way I truly want to.
So if you are tasked with making this team better in the short term, what better options do they have?