SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Player Worth at the moment

Created by: Shylo_Moxii
Team: 2019-20 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 15, 2020
Published: Apr. 15, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
13$999,999,999$168,410,000$0$0$831,589,999
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Panarin, Artemi
$15,620,000$15,620,000
Pettersson, Elias
$14,960,000$14,960,000
Pastrnak, David
$12,320,000$12,320,000
Marchand, Brad
$13,310,000$13,310,000
Point, Brayden
$13,640,000$13,640,000
Pacioretty, Max
$11,000,000$11,000,000
MacKinnon, Nathan
$12,650,000$12,650,000
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Ellis, Ryan
$14,630,000$14,630,000
Hedman, Victor
$12,320,000$12,320,000
Pietrangelo, Alex
$12,320,000$12,320,000
Pulock, Ryan
$12,320,000$12,320,000
Josi, Roman
$12,320,000$12,320,000
McAvoy, Charlie
$11,000,000$11,000,000

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 15, 2020 at 7:39 p.m.
#1
Brad Boyes please Wq
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 714
Ryan Pulock?
Apr. 15, 2020 at 7:41 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: StoneFan
Ryan Pulock?


So this is based on Wins Above Replacement the Formula is *3.3+1.1 and then you get how much they are worth in decimals.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 7:49 p.m.
#3
I hate this team
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 467
Soooooooo Ryan pulock has a contract coming up...
Apr. 15, 2020 at 7:53 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,197
Likes: 5,207
Precisely why nobody should ever use advanced stats as their primary point of view on hockey players
Hedman77, AndrewLadd, CD282 and 1 other person liked this.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 7:59 p.m.
#5
Cold spaghetti
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 2,134
Quoting: leafs101
Precisely why nobody should ever use advanced stats as their primary point of view on hockey players


Not saying that you should only focus on them but when it comes to this it actually shows how good a player really is all around. Pettersson for example, all of his numbers are very good and then you watch him play and you understand why its that way. Then Laine or Connor on the jets for example. Very good shooting talents but overall pretty meh at best
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:02 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,649
Quoting: leafs101
Precisely why nobody should ever use advanced stats as their primary point of view on hockey players

Stats such as WAR can be somewhat useful, but they lack context.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:03 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,197
Likes: 5,207
Quoting: bunzy1034
Not saying that you should only focus on them but when it comes to this it actually shows how good a player really is all around. Pettersson for example, all of his numbers are very good and then you watch him play and you understand why its that way. Then Laine or Connor on the jets for example. Very good shooting talents but overall pretty meh at best


My stance on them is that they can be used to further support what you see on the ice, and not the other way around.
bunzy1034 liked this.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:13 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: bunzy1034
Not saying that you should only focus on them but when it comes to this it actually shows how good a player really is all around. Pettersson for example, all of his numbers are very good and then you watch him play and you understand why its that way. Then Laine or Connor on the jets for example. Very good shooting talents but overall pretty meh at best


Both Ehlers and Kase I have talked to guys who said based off eye test alone they're the best forwards on their teams (when Kase was in ANA) I think that analytics usually line up pretty well with GOOD eye tests (not people who use the general consensus and claim it's "eye test") Demelo does as well, at least according to PoMo, and ik Fox does, he's insane at stopping the rush, he's so smart
bunzy1034 and Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:13 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: CD282
Stats such as WAR can be somewhat useful, but they lack context.


Exactly what context do they lack?
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:23 p.m.
#10
Cold spaghetti
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 2,134
Quoting: AFOX10900
Both Ehlers and Kase I have talked to guys who said based off eye test alone they're the best forwards on their teams (when Kase was in ANA) I think that analytics usually line up pretty well with GOOD eye tests (not people who use the general consensus and claim it's "eye test") Demelo does as well, at least according to PoMo, and ik Fox does, he's insane at stopping the rush, he's so smart


Agreed like I just don't understand how you can look at points and be like "WOW hes great", or "Wow hes bad". There is so much more that goes into it. Like when I watch the jets play, my eyes say hellebuyck, scheifele, and Ehlers are the best, and what do the underlying numbers say? that they are the best as well. When I watch Laine and Connor what do I see? Two players who have deadly shots when given space. Do they create that space themselves though? for the most part, NO. Do they play solid defense? No. So the eye-test and the analytics line up when you can see outside of G, A, PTS
Dan10900, Isles777, Shylo_Moxii and 1 other person liked this.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:32 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: bunzy1034
Agreed like I just don't understand how you can look at points and be like "WOW hes great", or "Wow hes bad". There is so much more that goes into it. Like when I watch the jets play, my eyes say hellebuyck, scheifele, and Ehlers are the best, and what do the underlying numbers say? that they are the best as well. When I watch Laine and Connor what do I see? Two players who have deadly shots when given space. Do they create that space themselves though? for the most part, NO. Do they play solid defense? No. So the eye-test and the analytics line up when you can see outside of G, A, PTS


Exactly, and even to an extent with some players, points lie, Drai who is likely gonna run away with the Hart scored nearly 50% of his points on one of the best PP's ever, and was also helped by playing an absurd amount in general, take that all into consideration he's 8th in 5v5 P/60, not so great... (I mean still very very good, you know what I mean lol) plus the eye test also backs up him being terrible defensively, I watched some of those condensed games and he just drifts through the NZ and throws like a half hearted poke check at the guy with the puck SO MUCH, but bc he plays on the PK he must be elite defensively (even tho he had one of the worst impacts on a 4v5 PK in the league...)
bunzy1034 and Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:38 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,649
Quoting: AFOX10900
Exactly what context do they lack?


Depends on the stat. WAR doesn't account for QoT or QoC, both of which have a huge effect on individual on-ice performance.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:38 p.m.
#13
Cold spaghetti
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 2,134
Quoting: AFOX10900
Exactly, and even to an extent with some players, points lie, Drai who is likely gonna run away with the Hart scored nearly 50% of his points on one of the best PP's ever, and was also helped by playing an absurd amount in general, take that all into consideration he's 8th in 5v5 P/60, not so great... (I mean still very very good, you know what I mean lol) plus the eye test also backs up him being terrible defensively, I watched some of those condensed games and he just drifts through the NZ and throws like a half hearted poke check at the guy with the puck SO MUCH, but bc he plays on the PK he must be elite defensively (even tho he had one of the worst impacts on a 4v5 PK in the league...)


Ya i mean yeah and then watch a guy like Panarin. I watched that game live when the rangers came here in February and he dominated the jets in every single area of the ice, while still being very fun and exciting to watch. That also another misconception for non stat users. They believe that the only players that have good advaned numbers are "scrubs" and "fourth liners". Thats hardly the case. For the most part, the top players in the game in terms of general belief are some of the best advanced stats players in the game as well. Like Mack, eichel, Matthews. All considered very good to the general hockey community. The stats support those statements for the most part.
Dan10900 liked this.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:41 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: leafs101
Precisely why nobody should ever use advanced stats as their primary point of view on hockey players


The purpose was not to show actual value, but it was meant to just be for fun. If you want actual context in trying for this it’s more of using GAR/GARx with WAR mix that in with the minimum contract you can go by you have your formula for an actual basis. This was more just me going through it noticing WAR and turning them into Contracts solely based on WAR. Now if you want just be a troll that’s another thing bud.
Isles777 liked this.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:45 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: bunzy1034
Ya i mean yeah and then watch a guy like Panarin. I watched that game live when the rangers came here in February and he dominated the jets in every single area of the ice, while still being very fun and exciting to watch. That also another misconception for non stat users. They believe that the only players that have good advaned numbers are "scrubs" and "fourth liners". Thats hardly the case. For the most part, the top players in the game in terms of general belief are some of the best advanced stats players in the game as well. Like Mack, eichel, Matthews. All considered very good to the general hockey community. The stats support those statements for the most part.


The typical "Oh PeR 60 sTaTs (or insert and analytic you for the most part) JuSt FaVoRs ScRuBs LiKe KaSe" is such a common misconception, like just go to NST out something and sort by P/60, the leaders are all superstar players for the most part... (I just keep saying p/60 bc I feel it's the least different from common perception, and is a good "first stat" to start looking at for people who hate analytics, but all of your points are largely supported by RAPM stats, GAR, and other stats like CF% and xG% etc)
bunzy1034 and Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:48 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: leafs101
Precisely why nobody should ever use advanced stats as their primary point of view on hockey players


Quoting: Nohate
Soooooooo Ryan pulock has a contract coming up...


I’m not using this exact formula as a sole basis that’s not my intent. WAR and GAR is a great basis for any type of contract use, but what you lack is the idea behind them. If you only go by Eye, people think Lucic is amazing and you thinks he’s all that good, but Advanced Stats users knew it was a bad deal, and guess what it turned into.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:49 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: AFOX10900
The typical "Oh PeR 60 sTaTs (or insert and analytic you for the most part) JuSt FaVoRs ScRuBs LiKe KaSe" is such a common misconception, like just go to NST out something and sort by P/60, the leaders are all superstar players for the most part... (I just keep saying p/60 bc I feel it's the least different from common perception, and is a good "first stat" to start looking at for people who hate analytics, but all of your points are largely supported by RAPM stats, GAR, and other stats like CF% and xG% etc)


Tbh I should have said don’t read because honestly that was me just looking at something on a list lol, and it was solely based on WAR, I’m trying to figure out how to insert GAR and Corsi into the factoring as well.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:49 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,649
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
The purpose was not to show actual value, but it was meant to just be for fun. If you want actual context in trying for this it’s more of using GAR/GARx with WAR mix that in with the minimum contract you can go by you have your formula for an actual basis. This was more just me going through it noticing WAR and turning them into Contracts solely based on WAR. Now if you want just be a troll that’s another thing bud.


Can you work out Matt Benning's value using the WAR formula above? I'm curious.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:50 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: CD282
Can you work out Matt Benning's value using the WAR formula above? I'm curious.


Yes it’s probably not going to be all that good.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:54 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: CD282
Depends on the stat. WAR doesn't account for QoT or QoC, both of which have a huge effect on individual on-ice performance.


False in two ways, A. GAR at least takes into account (I believe is largely based off of, but I've never seen their formula so idk) RAPM which is sort of like a WOWY with ever player on your team, so yes it does take into account QoT, and B. QoC is largely inconsequential on a players performance, my estimate is that it's less than 10% as influential as QoT, but that's just a rough estimate based off many articles that have described why QoC doesn't particularly matter, the players coach can't control the opposing teams lines so it ends up that the 4th liners happen to go against the opposing teams first lines about the same % of their toi as their first line, sometimes more depending on the team... Plus the margin of skill between the best and worst 5 man units in most scenarios isn't big enough that a miniscule difference in the % of time vs high end competition causes all that much change in a players performance.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:55 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,649
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Yes it’s probably not going to be all that good.


Humor me.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:55 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Yes it’s probably not going to be all that good.


Benning is p good analytically last I checked
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:58 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: CD282
Can you work out Matt Benning's value using the WAR formula above? I'm curious.


2016-17 Measurements WAR 1.6 - $6,380,000
2017-18 Measurements WAR 1 - $4,400,000
2018-19 Measurements WAR 2 - $7,700,000
2019-20 Measurements WAR 0.9 - $4,070,000
Apr. 15, 2020 at 8:59 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: AFOX10900
Benning is p good analytically last I checked


0.9 WAR Is better than I expected.
Apr. 15, 2020 at 9:05 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
0.9 WAR Is better than I expected.


Plus that's totals (I think) and he was hurt for a good bit of the year iirc
Shylo_Moxii liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll