SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Unrealistic CBJ Trade

Created by: NathanHorton
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 16, 2020
Published: Apr. 16, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I’m obviously bored and there has been no hockey on but NESN has been broadcasting the 2011 Bruins playoff run And it’s been great to watch.

Looking back at that team theres 2 things i take away.

That defensive core was some dominant (minus Kaberle). Chara, seideinberg, mcquaid ,boychuck and Ference. Veteran defenders all in their prime, great skaters with a physical presence.

The other thing I took away was how dominant that Lucic- Krejci- Horton first line was. It sucks realizing since Lucic and Horton, Krejci has had no stability on either side of him for almost 7 seasons.

Lots bruins fans like to say that they got bullied by the blues in the cup final last year. I think thats bull**** and not the reason we lost that series, but i would like the team to have a more physical presence. And im not talking about just signing some goons, you do it by adding power forwards who play physical and have skill. Get the opponents to be looking over their shoulders all game when that puck gets dumped in a corner and keep guys accountable (Rask being knocked out by Bemstrom and no response).

I really like Dubois, his game is exactly what I envision when you talk about power forwards and same thing with Josh Anderson when he’s healthy. Obviously in the trade below the big piece is Dubois. So this is how i broke down the trade.

Dubois = Debrusk, 1st, Fredric
Anderson = 2nd, bjork

I think in general its a lot to give up but I think its realistic in that it would take a lot to get CBJ to get rid of both those guys.

Don’t focus so much on the trade but more of how I would like to see the Bruins be built. They’ll play anyway you want skill or physical wise. LMK what your opinion is on the Bruins roster
Trades
CBJ
  1. Bjork, Anders
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Frederic, Trent
  4. 2021 1st round pick (BOS)
  5. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$80,243,092$0$4,445,000$1,256,908
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$117,500$118K)
RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,498,925$1,498,925
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$747,500$747,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 16, 2020 at 6:02 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Yeah Bruins say No Immediately.

Anderson is worth nothing right now, he is coming off of a 4 point crappy year and is worth literally nothing.
Even if Dubios is worth Debrusk, Bjork, and a 1st (which he isnt, he is owrth less), that means you are giving a 2nd and Freddy for Anderson,

THIS IS REALLLLLY BAD.

Update: i didnt see your breakdown.
Dubios is good, but not worth Debrusk, Freddy and a 1st. Maybe Debrusk and a 1st, but not freddy too.
But yeah Anderson being worth Bjork and a 2nd is like saying John Moore is worth a 1st rounder and a prospect. He isnt
Apr. 16, 2020 at 6:03 p.m.
#2
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 2,180
Quoting: bsilk18
Yeah Bruins say No Immediately.

Anderson is worth nothing right now, he is coming off of a 4 point crappy year and is worth literally nothing.
Even if Dubios is worth Debrusk, Bjork, and a 1st (which he isnt, he is owrth less), that means you are giving a 2nd and Freddy for Anderson,

THIS IS REALLLLLY BAD.


Bahaha if your GM turned down Bjork, DeBrusk and a very late first for Dubois then he should be immediately fired. Also, Josh had a bad year but hes got value. If Jarmo let the league know he was available then at least 20 teams would inquire
Apr. 16, 2020 at 6:04 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 232
Likes: 125
Quoting: bsilk18
Yeah Bruins say No Immediately.

Anderson is worth nothing right now, he is coming off of a 4 point crappy year and is worth literally nothing.
Even if Dubios is worth Debrusk, Bjork, and a 1st (which he isnt, he is owrth less), that means you are giving a 2nd and Freddy for Anderson,

THIS IS REALLLLLY BAD.


Like i said the value is off but i would like the build of the team better
Apr. 16, 2020 at 6:05 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
Bahaha if your GM turned down Bjork, DeBrusk and a very late first for Dubois then he should be immediately fired.


Nope. We like our elite LW sniper, our solid top 6 potential Powerful Winger, and we will give up a late 1st, but not for that.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 6:06 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 232
Likes: 125
Quoting: bsilk18
Nope. We like our elite LW sniper, our solid top 6 potential Powerful Winger, and we will give up a late 1st, but not for that.


I think you underestimate how good Dubois is and will be
Apr. 16, 2020 at 6:09 p.m.
#6
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 2,180
Quoting: bsilk18
Nope. We like our elite LW sniper, our solid top 6 potential Powerful Winger, and we will give up a late 1st, but not for that.


Dubois is a first line center on a bad offensive team. Plus hes what, 21? Debrusk is not ****ing even close to elite holy ****. Hes a decent second liner. Bjork is okay but has injury concerns and I would be shocked if he turned into more than a decent middle 6 option. Plus, let's not act like Frederic is some kind of top prospect. I really believe you're trolling because theres no way you actually think this.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:19 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: Nathan_Horton_18
I think you underestimate how good Dubois is and will be


I don’t think he’s undervaluing PLD, I think he’s massively overvaluing his own players.

Sorry but nothing in that trade is close to the skill level and potential of PLD. The Quantity might make the trade fair but the Quality isn’t there. Columbus also needs centers. This is more of a dream post than a realistic one.

Though this bruins team is very scary looking with PLD and Anderson.
Friendly_Cannon and JarmoK liked this.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:20 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Nathan_Horton_18
I think you underestimate how good Dubois is and will be


And you underestimate how good debrusk is and will be. The bruins are not giving up their entire middle 6 winger core for another Natural Center, especially at that value
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:22 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Ajp_18
I don’t think he’s undervaluing PLD, I think he’s massively overvaluing his own players.

Sorry but nothing in that trade is close to the skill level and potential of PLD. The Quantity might make the trade fair but the Quality isn’t there. Columbus also needs centers. This is more of a dream post than a realistic one.

Though this bruins team is very scary looking with PLD and Anderson.


Im not unfortunately, right now everyone is talking about how Anderson is worth no more than a 6th roudner rn because he just has killed his stock this year.
Debrusk is constantly underrated and people are trying to say he is a middle six guy with top six potential, he is as much as top 6 guy as a Boeser, and as much an elite potential guy as Barzal or Larkin.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:24 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
Dubois is a first line center on a bad offensive team. Plus hes what, 21? Debrusk is not ****ing even close to elite holy ****. Hes a decent second liner. Bjork is okay but has injury concerns and I would be shocked if he turned into more than a decent middle 6 option. Plus, let's not act like Frederic is some kind of top prospect. I really believe you're trolling because theres no way you actually think this.


So yes this is the point unfortunately, everyone else wants to undervalue bruins guys.
Im just being realistic.
He is a solid second liner right now, and he is 23 and has plenty of room to grow. You are the only crazy one here, you are entitled to your opinion, but dont come on here swearing and being completely ridiculous
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:27 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 232
Likes: 125
Quoting: Ajp_18
I don’t think he’s undervaluing PLD, I think he’s massively overvaluing his own players.

Sorry but nothing in that trade is close to the skill level and potential of PLD. The Quantity might make the trade fair but the Quality isn’t there. Columbus also needs centers. This is more of a dream post than a realistic one.

Though this bruins team is very scary looking with PLD and Anderson.


That’s exactly what the post is, its a dream post because that Bruins team is very scary
Ajp_18 liked this.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:29 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: bsilk18
Im not unfortunately, right now everyone is talking about how Anderson is worth no more than a 6th roudner rn because he just has killed his stock this year.
Debrusk is constantly underrated and people are trying to say he is a middle six guy with top six potential, he is as much as top 6 guy as a Boeser, and as much an elite potential guy as Barzal or Larkin.


Child, your homer is showing.

The only ones who say Anderson has no value are the ones who want him for nothing. If you want Anderson the price is a 2nd as Columbus has no reason to trade him for less. DeBrusk is a solid top 6 wing. He won’t be a thing more, he’s not going to be some magical elite sniper like Pasta or Laine or Matthews. He’ll score you 30 goals a year but he isn’t elite, maybe he’ll get a year of 40 with the right center or other wing.
Friendly_Cannon liked this.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:29 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 232
Likes: 125
Quoting: bsilk18
And you underestimate how good debrusk is and will be. The bruins are not giving up their entire middle 6 winger core for another Natural Center, especially at that value


Again im just saying i like the build of the team better like this if you don’t agree then thats your opinion. I just think this team would be dominant and so fun to watch
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:32 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Nathan_Horton_18
Again im just saying i like the build of the team better like this if you don’t agree then thats your opinion. I just think this team would be dominant and so fun to watch


Oh no I agree with that. I never mentioned my opinion whatsoever.
I am just saying that the values are off
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:34 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 232
Likes: 125
Quoting: bsilk18
Oh no I agree with that. I never mentioned my opinion whatsoever.
I am just saying that the values are off


The value is just hard to gauge because it’ll never happen, just a dream post I really like Debrusk and bjork but i love the way Anderson and Dubois play.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:37 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Ajp_18
Child, your homer is showing.

The only ones who say Anderson has no value are the ones who want him for nothing. If you want Anderson the price is a 2nd as Columbus has no reason to trade him for less. DeBrusk is a solid top 6 wing. He won’t be a thing more, he’s not going to be some magical elite sniper like Pasta or Laine or Matthews. He’ll score you 30 goals a year but he isn’t elite, maybe he’ll get a year of 40 with the right center or other wing.


Nope. my best way to explain this (how i have explained things multiple times to people) is that Role =/= Skill Level.
If you have a team with OVI, Marchy, and Panarin, Panarin is going to get 3rd line minutes, but that doesnt mean he is a third line guy. He is still a top LW.
So, just because Debrusk is on the second line because the bruins have marchand, does mean he cant be a good top line LW on another team. I think a perfect comparison is Boeser, who was drafted right with him (a little later), but is on a sucky Canucks team, and he is the same top 6 guy with Elite potential, but it is more clear because of his playing time and role on the team.

So no, my "homer" is not showing, I am not biased, I am just realistic.
So based on the beautiful facts and situations I have just laid out for you, do you have a well backed up response?
Apr. 16, 2020 at 7:38 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Nathan_Horton_18
The value is just hard to gauge because it’ll never happen, just a dream post I really like Debrusk and bjork but i love the way Anderson and Dubois play.


Fair bro!
Again, if you loved andersons play this year thats an issue, but yeah I really like PLD also and it would be dope to have him. Debrusk, Freddy, and a 2nd is sufficient for the whole trade. Debrusk, Freddy, and a 3rd for PLD alone
NathanHorton liked this.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:02 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: bsilk18
Nope. my best way to explain this (how i have explained things multiple times to people) is that Role =/= Skill Level.
If you have a team with OVI, Marchy, and Panarin, Panarin is going to get 3rd line minutes, but that doesn't mean he is a third line guy. He is still a top LW.
So, just because Debrusk is on the second line because the bruins have marchand, does mean he can't be a good top line LW on another team. I think a perfect comparison is Boeser, who was drafted right with him (a little later), but is on a sucky Canucks team, and he is the same top 6 guy with Elite potential, but it is more clear because of his playing time and role on the team.

So no, my "homer" is not showing, I am not biased, I am just realistic.
So based on the beautiful facts and situations I have just laid out for you, do you have a well backed up response?


You are correct on the point about the line thing, but that's not what I meant. Here are some stats from Elite NHL snipers, at least players who I think sniper I think of them.
Ovechkin- 14 seasons of 30+ goals none under 30 tbh, his lowest was 32 in a 48 game season. Of those 14 season 8 of them were 50+ goals.
Tarasnko-had 5 seasons pus 30 and hasn't ever broken 50
Laine- 3 seasons 30+ and was 2 shy of his 4th this year.
Matthews- 4 seasons +30 and 2 of them +40
Stamkos- 6 seasons +30 goals and a +60 goal season
Tavares- 5 seasons + 30 goals

Boeser- 0 seasons +30 (solid top 6 player IMO)
DeBrusk- 0 seasons + 30, 27 being pretty close
Rantanen- 1 season +30 and a 29 season,
Connor- 3 seasons 30+ goals
Aho- 2 seasons 30+ and a 29.


From the 2015 class alone DeBrusk is 11th in NHL goals, Though I will give him credit, he has played 1 less season then a lot of those guys. I wouldn't consider him an elite sniper. Solid top 6 sniper, no doubt but not someone whos elite. He'll need a few 30+ goal seasons to get there imo.
ngikas liked this.
Apr. 16, 2020 at 8:20 p.m.
#19
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 2,180
Quoting: bsilk18
So yes this is the point unfortunately, everyone else wants to undervalue bruins guys.
Im just being realistic.
He is a solid second liner right now, and he is 23 and has plenty of room to grow. You are the only crazy one here, you are entitled to your opinion, but dont come on here swearing and being completely ridiculous


Ok I know DeBrusk can get butter but... so? Dubois is younger and already 3x better.

Dubois would instantly be your best forward outside of your top line in terms of current skill and potential. You acting like DeBrusk is better shows that you'd be a terrible GM. Dont forget Dubois plays on a bad offensive team when you compare their points. You saying DeBrusk is better is like me saying Riley Nash is better than Bergeron. It's also not like Dubois couldnt switch to wing
Apr. 16, 2020 at 11:40 p.m.
#20
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Ajp_18
You are correct on the point about the line thing, but that's not what I meant. Here are some stats from Elite NHL snipers, at least players who I think sniper I think of them.
Ovechkin- 14 seasons of 30+ goals none under 30 tbh, his lowest was 32 in a 48 game season. Of those 14 season 8 of them were 50+ goals.
Tarasnko-had 5 seasons pus 30 and hasn't ever broken 50
Laine- 3 seasons 30+ and was 2 shy of his 4th this year.
Matthews- 4 seasons +30 and 2 of them +40
Stamkos- 6 seasons +30 goals and a +60 goal season
Tavares- 5 seasons + 30 goals

Boeser- 0 seasons +30 (solid top 6 player IMO)
DeBrusk- 0 seasons + 30, 27 being pretty close
Rantanen- 1 season +30 and a 29 season,
Connor- 3 seasons 30+ goals
Aho- 2 seasons 30+ and a 29.


From the 2015 class alone DeBrusk is 11th in NHL goals, Though I will give him credit, he has played 1 less season then a lot of those guys. I wouldn't consider him an elite sniper. Solid top 6 sniper, no doubt but not someone whos elite. He'll need a few 30+ goal seasons to get there imo.


As I explicitely said, he isnt elite yet, but he is a solid not 6 guy with Elite potential and people dont even want to admit that he has elite potential. That is the flaw in this guys post. I am not a homer, I dont think Debrusk is this elite LW sniper that shouldnt be traded, but as i clearly said, he has Elite potential and is still only 23. Him plus Freddy and a 2nd is more than enough for Dubios (plus think about the contract PLD is gonna want after this year, at least with debrusk, they can give him a bridge deal
Apr. 16, 2020 at 11:43 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
Ok I know DeBrusk can get butter but... so? Dubois is younger and already 3x better.

Dubois would instantly be your best forward outside of your top line in terms of current skill and potential. You acting like DeBrusk is better shows that you'd be a terrible GM. Dont forget Dubois plays on a bad offensive team when you compare their points. You saying DeBrusk is better is like me saying Riley Nash is better than Bergeron. It's also not like Dubois couldnt switch to wing


You saying that PLD is THAT much better than debrusk is like me saying Seguin is 100 times better than Bergy, we all know it aint true.
He is better, yeah, thats why he is worth debrusk, Trent Frederic (recent 1st rounder, not a bust), and a 2nd round pick. Thats a lot. PLD is a good upgrade. But, and as I have been saying and proven, PLD isnt worth debrusk, Freddy, BJORK (a solid middle six guy with top 6 potential), AND A 1st (Oh and part of that send roudner too, the other part being reserved for Andersson who is worth aobut a 6th or 5th right now)
Apr. 17, 2020 at 12:00 a.m.
#22
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 2,180
Quoting: bsilk18
You saying that PLD is THAT much better than debrusk is like me saying Seguin is 100 times better than Bergy, we all know it aint true.
He is better, yeah, thats why he is worth debrusk, Trent Frederic (recent 1st rounder, not a bust), and a 2nd round pick. Thats a lot. PLD is a good upgrade. But, and as I have been saying and proven, PLD isnt worth debrusk, Freddy, BJORK (a solid middle six guy with top 6 potential), AND A 1st (Oh and part of that send roudner too, the other part being reserved for Andersson who is worth aobut a 6th or 5th right now)


Then good thing you arent a GM lol. In a world where the media leaks that Sweeny rejected that trade... boston fans would demand his firing on the spot.
Ajp_18 liked this.
Apr. 17, 2020 at 12:43 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: bsilk18
As I explicitely said, he isnt elite yet, but he is a solid not 6 guy with Elite potential and people dont even want to admit that he has elite potential. That is the flaw in this guys post. I am not a homer, I dont think Debrusk is this elite LW sniper that shouldnt be traded, but as i clearly said, he has Elite potential and is still only 23. Him plus Freddy and a 2nd is more than enough for Dubios (plus think about the contract PLD is gonna want after this year, at least with debrusk, they can give him a bridge deal


You are 100% being a homer.

You said how stats of elite sniper, I believe I showed some of those and DeBrusk isn’t even close to being elite.

I think DeBrusk is going to be a great top 6 player. He isn’t going to be elite. The elite snipers have had 30+ goal seasons already and DeBrusk doesn’t have one of those.

If he puts up consecutive 30+ goal seasons, then yes he’d be considered elite, but he isn’t even close to the same conversation as Barzal, Aho, Connor, Marner, Meier or Rantanen right now and they aren’t even in the conversation about the best in the draft with Eichel, oh and McDavid the best player in the NHL. Just because someone if from one of the best draft classes ever doesn’t mean they’re elite.

It’s like me saying Texier is elite and he really hasn’t show that.
Apr. 17, 2020 at 1:19 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 255
@Ajp_18 im gonna throw a counter offer out there for PLD.
CBJ gets: Studnicka, Krejci, 1st and Bjork
BOS gets: PLD, Anderson

Breaks down
Studnicka, Krejci and 1st for PLD
Anderson for Bjork

I’m probably off. I’d rather that 1st be a 2nd but I’d still pay up for PLD. Probably a homer trade so I apologize but I believe Krejci still carries a good amount more of value than Frederic despite his contract and age. And if you wanted LHD instead of a young C, I’d replace Stud with Vaak
Apr. 17, 2020 at 1:39 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: ngikas
@Ajp_18 im gonna throw a counter offer out there for PLD.
CBJ gets: Studnicka, Krejci, 1st and Bjork
BOS gets: PLD, Anderson

Breaks down
Studnicka, Krejci and 1st for PLD
Anderson for Bjork

I’m probably off. I’d rather that 1st be a 2nd but I’d still pay up for PLD. Probably a homer trade so I apologize but I believe Krejci still carries a good amount more of value than Frederic despite his contract and age. And if you wanted LHD instead of a young C, I’d replace Stud with Vaak


The problem with Krejci is his age tbh. How much longer does he have left and does he even finish the contract. PLD is 21 or 22. I wanna say that’s at least a 10 Year difference. Krejci is a player that someone goes and gets to put them over the top, not a guy a rebuilding team wants and if Columbus were to trade PLD they’d have to be considered a rebuilder. So then Krejci’s value would turn into nothing but a cap replacement for the contract that PLD would get to even out the cap hits, nothing more.

The other problem is any “realistic” trade that includes PLD isn’t realistic as Columbus would be stupid to trade him unless he tells them he isn’t resigning and going to the KHL for 5 years and won’t play in NA until he’s 27 so he’s a UFA.
ngikas liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll