SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dumba for willy

Created by: Muzzin9
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 18, 2020
Published: Apr. 18, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
It's a lot for dumba but losing willy's cap hit even though it isnt as bad of a contract as everyone believes you move his money into 2 areas of need. Rhd and depth center.
Johnnson trade was for cap savings.
And moving kerfoot to wing seems like a better fit for him.
Dermott signing was based on him signing the qualifying offer.
If he signs longer term. Like 2 or 3 years I'd imagine it would be for 1.5 to 2mil a year.
Losing liljegren is more because I think dermott is better and I dont see liljegren cracking the lineup for a while imo.
Schenn veteran depth who plays hard and would give alittle grit if someone in top 6 went down with injury
Clifford same thing brings a different element.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$880,000
1$1,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$700,000
3$1,400,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Dumba, Matt
  2. Eriksson Ek, Joel
  3. 2022 6th round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Nylander, William
  3. 2020 4th round pick (VGK)
  4. 2020 6th round pick (CAR)
2.
TOR
  1. 2021 4th round pick (EDM)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (EDM)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,079,917$0$0$1,420,083
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,487,500$1,487,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$880,000$880,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 18, 2020 at 10:51 a.m.
#1
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,769
Likes: 1,626
Huge L of a trade.
Torontoleafs15, Lights and aadoyle liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 10:52 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 737
Dumba isn't the piece we need
MMXD liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Seems like a lot for the Leafs to give up, But it's probably what it would take to get Dumba to the Leafs.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 10:57 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Quoting: Torontoleafs15
Dumba isn't the piece we need


I would love Pietro but I dont see it.
I'd love manson to but I wouldn't give up willy for him.
And I'd rather have dumba then ekblad or a ristolainen or someone like that.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 10:59 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Seems like a lot for the Leafs to give up, But it's probably what it would take to get Dumba to the Leafs.


It is alot but it is satisfying a need we havent had in our lineup since phaneuf. Phaneuf wasnt perfect by any means but the dude played pp pk and the right side. And he was constantly crushed by his partners when hes paired with kostka lol.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 10:59 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,276
Likes: 14,791
definitely a horrible trade for toronto
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:01 a.m.
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,553
Likes: 23,256
Maybe the Leafs should just develop their Dmen, in this case Liljegren. instead of trading for average Dmen. Yea Clifford brings a different element, but he isn't good especially at that price.
Johnson doesn't get that return when 24 teams are trying dump cap. Just too few buyers of average players with no cap exchanged.

You made a comment "I'd love Manson". Manson's pretty average now, but Leaf fans are so fascinated by any RHD,
t
leafs101 and gmurrayt liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:02 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,216
Likes: 5,213
Quoting: Muzzin9
I would love Pietro but I dont see it.
I'd love manson to but I wouldn't give up willy for him.
And I'd rather have dumba then ekblad or a ristolainen or someone like that.


I'd take ekblad any day. Has almost as much offensive upside and is an absolute rock defensively. But him and dumba will cost a lot. I'd give willy for ekblad, but not dumba. This isn't needed though. The top 4 can be filled out with many other players, they don't need another #1 D (it would be nice, but not needed). Just some solid, defensive top 4 d, and there are many other players that fit that build that cost half as much
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:06 a.m.
#9
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,850
Likes: 11,542
The Wild takes that and runs.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:07 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Quoting: leafs101
I'd take ekblad any day. Has almost as much offensive upside and is an absolute rock defensively. But him and dumba will cost a lot. I'd give willy for ekblad, but not dumba. This isn't needed though. The top 4 can be filled out with many other players, they don't need another #1 D (it would be nice, but not needed). Just some solid, defensive top 4 d, and there are many other players that fit that build that cost half as much


Fair enough.
If the cap was going up to what it was suppose to I for sure wouldn't trade willy. I'd look to sign a d guy but we'll see what the cap does or buyouts.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:12 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,216
Likes: 5,213
Quoting: Muzzin9
Fair enough.
If the cap was going up to what it was suppose to I for sure wouldn't trade willy. I'd look to sign a d guy but we'll see what the cap does or buyouts.


honestly, not that I want either gone, but I'd trade Marner before willy, as he'll get a better return and take more money off the books. That being said I do think at least one other solid top 4 can be added before next season even under this cap
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:15 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,072
Leafs fans will hate it since many think Dumba is a scrub defensively, but Dumba's problem is that he was trying to force plays in the offensive zone and his defensive game was lacking because of that. When Dumba is producing points and not forcing plays he is above average in his own zone. It was all in his head this year. He might not be perfect for the Leafs but he'd be a great addition and would add some toughness to their blue line. He is still a top pairing talent. I don't like the idea of trading Ek but if it nets us Nylander it could be worth it. I think if you remove the picks it's fair. Might even need a slight add from the Wild or downgrade Liljegren to a different piece (we need LD prospects more than RD prospects anyways).
OutCold13 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:19 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Quoting: leafs101
honestly, not that I want either gone, but I'd trade Marner before willy, as he'll get a better return and take more money off the books. That being said I do think at least one other solid top 4 can be added before next season even under this cap


I agree. I wouldn't want to lose either willy or marner. Even liljegren I'd keep.
I dont think their D is terrible they need 1 solid guy a right side jake Muzzin.
I'm more concerned over their bottom six. They need more forecheckers if that makes sense. Leafs have rarely if ever had star players like they do now. But their bottom 6 needs to play like a bottom 6. Pucks in deep and bang bodies. I hate how they're built with every line trying to do the same thing.
Guys like clifford and matt Martin before they dont put up points and fit the mould of what the leafs have become but at least you know they're going to play the same way every game. Guys like malgin are invisible down at the bottom because they dont do any else.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:38 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,216
Likes: 5,213
Quoting: Muzzin9
I agree. I wouldn't want to lose either willy or marner. Even liljegren I'd keep.
I dont think their D is terrible they need 1 solid guy a right side jake Muzzin.
I'm more concerned over their bottom six. They need more forecheckers if that makes sense. Leafs have rarely if ever had star players like they do now. But their bottom 6 needs to play like a bottom 6. Pucks in deep and bang bodies. I hate how they're built with every line trying to do the same thing.
Guys like clifford and matt Martin before they dont put up points and fit the mould of what the leafs have become but at least you know they're going to play the same way every game. Guys like malgin are invisible down at the bottom because they dont do any else.


I agree with the, but I don't think that they necessarily need a Clifford or Martin. If the price is right, I'd take one, but its a team thing, and I noticed towards the end of this season that they were starting to play with some bite- they need guys like Matthews and tavares to step up and throw hits, which they actually shockingly had been at the end. Hyman is a gritty guy, kapanen was throwing hits and fighting like I had never seen before, kerfoot does play a bit dirty which I like, its not all that bad. and supposedly korshkov, who I have making it next year, plays with some bite too. I think its something that needs to be engrained in the team as opposed to overpaying one individual goon, and I think it was starting to happen. If the price is right, bring back Clifford by all means, but if not, cheap energy forwards who will do what it takes and play physical to be able to get some NHL games in will do. As for the D, I don't think Holl is a sufficient top 4 D on a contending team. In my opinion they need 2 solid RHD, which can be done.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:41 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,691
Likes: 696
Huge L for the leafs
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:43 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,691
Likes: 696
Quoting: palhal
Maybe the Leafs should just develop their Dmen, in this case Liljegren. instead of trading for average Dmen. Yea Clifford brings a different element, but he isn't good especially at that price.
Johnson doesn't get that return when 24 teams are trying dump cap. Just too few buyers of average players with no cap exchanged.

You made a comment "I'd love Manson". Manson's pretty average now, but Leaf fans are so fascinated by any RHD,
t


Everyone seems to be overrating Manson. It’s so bizarre
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:45 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,691
Likes: 696
Quoting: leafs101
I agree with the, but I don't think that they necessarily need a Clifford or Martin. If the price is right, I'd take one, but its a team thing, and I noticed towards the end of this season that they were starting to play with some bite- they need guys like Matthews and tavares to step up and throw hits, which they actually shockingly had been at the end. Hyman is a gritty guy, kapanen was throwing hits and fighting like I had never seen before, kerfoot does play a bit dirty which I like, its not all that bad. and supposedly korshkov, who I have making it next year, plays with some bite too. I think its something that needs to be engrained in the team as opposed to overpaying one individual goon, and I think it was starting to happen. If the price is right, bring back Clifford by all means, but if not, cheap energy forwards who will do what it takes and play physical to be able to get some NHL games in will do. As for the D, I don't think Holl is a sufficient top 4 D on a contending team. In my opinion they need 2 solid RHD, which can be done.


Matthews is a big boy. If he made hits they could be brutal. And yeah, I’ve been saying Korshkov for a bit now because he plays with grit and can handle the puck. He also comes way cheaper than Clifford
leafs101 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 11:52 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,216
Likes: 5,213
Quoting: MMXD
Matthews is a big boy. If he made hits they could be brutal. And yeah, I’ve been saying Korshkov for a bit now because he plays with grit and can handle the puck. He also comes way cheaper than Clifford


And I started to see that game out of Matthews towards the end of the season. He's already absurdly dominant, but adding hitting to his game would just make him utterly impossible to play against- and it practically already is
Apr. 18, 2020 at 12:06 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 4,214
Likes: 5,077
Tbh I like the trade.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 12:23 p.m.
#20
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 2,503
I think the value is there for the Wild, but given their overall lack of centers and Nylander not being a bonafide center, my guess is they decline cause they need JEEK. However, if Guerin looked at tape and talked to scouting dept. then decided Nylander was legit playing center then I'm sure he says deal.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 12:48 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Quoting: leafs101
I agree with the, but I don't think that they necessarily need a Clifford or Martin. If the price is right, I'd take one, but its a team thing, and I noticed towards the end of this season that they were starting to play with some bite- they need guys like Matthews and tavares to step up and throw hits, which they actually shockingly had been at the end. Hyman is a gritty guy, kapanen was throwing hits and fighting like I had never seen before, kerfoot does play a bit dirty which I like, its not all that bad. and supposedly korshkov, who I have making it next year, plays with some bite too. I think its something that needs to be engrained in the team as opposed to overpaying one individual goon, and I think it was starting to happen. If the price is right, bring back Clifford by all means, but if not, cheap energy forwards who will do what it takes and play physical to be able to get some NHL games in will do. As for the D, I don't think Holl is a sufficient top 4 D on a contending team. In my opinion they need 2 solid RHD, which can be done.


Forsure money has to be right. I loved martin on the leafs but not at 2.5...
I would love to grab guys like tyler bertuzzi. If the leafs had another Hyman that would be nice also. Guys like that to fill out other roles. I'd love to have all skill but at the right number getting some hungry guys in the bottom six is never a bad thing. You dont need to fight but you have to hit and play hard.
Leafs seem to skate around and like to play that soft game.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:24 p.m.
#22
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 34,832
Likes: 21,217
big fat no to that trade
Apr. 18, 2020 at 4:31 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,216
Likes: 5,213
Quoting: Muzzin9
Forsure money has to be right. I loved martin on the leafs but not at 2.5...
I would love to grab guys like tyler bertuzzi. If the leafs had another Hyman that would be nice also. Guys like that to fill out other roles. I'd love to have all skill but at the right number getting some hungry guys in the bottom six is never a bad thing. You dont need to fight but you have to hit and play hard.
Leafs seem to skate around and like to play that soft game.


bertuzzi would cost so much to take off DET, and will command 4.5M or more on his next deal. honestly the leafs are improving on their softness. Just a few gritty guys on the bubble who will be physical to stay in the nhl would work
Apr. 19, 2020 at 10:01 a.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Quoting: leafs101
bertuzzi would cost so much to take off DET, and will command 4.5M or more on his next deal. honestly the leafs are improving on their softness. Just a few gritty guys on the bubble who will be physical to stay in the nhl would work


Totally agree.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll