SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Covid-19 salary cap impact players signatures

Created by: BuckRogers
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 11, 2020
Published: Apr. 18, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$900,000
3$770,000
3$823,000
3$910,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,750,000
2$975,000
2$775,000
2$1,075,000
2$1,800,000
2$870,000
2$775,000
2$975,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,500,000
7$8,500,000
Trades
MTL
  1. Benning, Matthew [RFA Rights]
  2. Lavoie, Raphael
  3. 2020 1st round pick (EDM)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$78,150,475$0$2,945,000$3,349,525
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$975,000$975,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$900,000$900,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$771,666$771,666 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 18, 2020 at 12:42 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
For 1 year of Tartar ahahahhahahahahh NEVER
CD282 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 12:44 p.m.
#2
Quick
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 346
Likes: 22
sad that will not happen frown
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:50 p.m.
#3
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
It's completely idiotic to trade Tatar for more of what we already have and then replace him with an overpaid Taylor Hall. I'd rather Tatar over Hall any day of the week.

And even if the cap were going up, the Krug, Hall, and Domi signings would still be bad contracts.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 2:08 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 441
Likes: 159
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
It's completely idiotic to trade Tatar for more of what we already have and then replace him with an overpaid Taylor Hall. I'd rather Tatar over Hall any day of the week.

And even if the cap were going up, the Krug, Hall, and Domi signings would still be bad contracts.


Don’t know what you have against Domi but since joining the habs he’s had a career year and although his play was inconsistent still put up decent numbers this season. That’s not a bad contract at all. Although Tatar has been great since joining us it’s possible his play will be declining when the habs are contenders. I’m both for trading him and signing him, if we get an overpay offer we move him, if he asks too long of term we should move him . Adding youth which will be ready when we’re contenders is a good move as well
EJ11 and Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 2:21 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
No way Edmonton accepts that.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 3:03 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13
Likes: 1
Well said HFX_10
Quoting: Habs_Hfx10
Don’t know what you have against Domi but since joining the habs he’s had a career year and although his play was inconsistent still put up decent numbers this season. That’s not a bad contract at all. Although Tatar has been great since joining us it’s possible his play will be declining when the habs are contenders. I’m both for trading him and signing him, if we get an overpay offer we move him, if he asks too long of term we should move him . Adding youth which will be ready when we’re contenders is a good move as well


Agreed, great points! We have to be realistic and accept we are not on Bos, TB & Tor levels right now. Yes we have depth but until we can improve our top 4 D and produce a true #1 centre, the best thing to do is the rebuild through the draft and/or using the surplus of solid picks and prospects to acquire young higher end prospects. This also gives time for our current solid to higher prospects Suzuki, Poehling, KK, Mete, Juulsen, Fleury, Brook time to develop. Any team over the past decade that has sustained being a contender for long periods of time have done so through draft (Pit, Chi, TB, Bos, Tor, LA, STL, Was? with some home grown elite/higher end picks and prospects and building around that. I get it, most of those teams also won Draft lotteries and landed several top 5 picks but that still doesn't make it foolproof, there has to be depth and a good mix (sorry Edm, Buf & Flo, you haven't been able to make this work). We cannot afford to get caught up in high paid, long term deals with guys over 30. We already have Weber and Price, who i love but won't be worth their cap hit in 2/3 more years. If we can re-sign Petry and Tatar at 2/3 year deals at current salary or less, i'm all for keeping them. But I don't see that happening (and in their defense, if winning a cup now and/or getting paid as much as possible is what they want, than re-signing as a Hab, is NOT in their best interest).
Apr. 18, 2020 at 4:18 p.m.
#7
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: Habs_Hfx10
Don’t know what you have against Domi but since joining the habs he’s had a career year and although his play was inconsistent still put up decent numbers this season. That’s not a bad contract at all. Although Tatar has been great since joining us it’s possible his play will be declining when the habs are contenders. I’m both for trading him and signing him, if we get an overpay offer we move him, if he asks too long of term we should move him . Adding youth which will be ready when we’re contenders is a good move as well


I agree with you completely about Tatar, but I don’t know why anyone would be willing to overpay an aging Taylor Hall, when he’s only 11 months younger than Tatar, and has had injury issues before. As for the youth, yeah it’s good to add it, but you need to have a mix. I prefer to have young players like Romanov, Primeau, Caufield, etc. mixed with veterans like Price, Weber, Gallagher, & Tatar. IMO we have enough young players & prospects to fill out a roster for when we are contenders, and should be focusing on keeping some veterans, so we have experience when the time comes.
BuckRogers liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll