SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pietrangelo and Rakell

Created by: Richard88
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 18, 2020
Published: Apr. 18, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Avs sign Pietrangelo in UFA and trade for Rakell.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,000,000
2$735,000
3$2,500,000
1$735,000
1$925,000
3$2,000,000
2$700,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$9,000,000
2$1,200,000
Trades
1.
COL
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (DAL)
  2. 2020 4th round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
2.
COL
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (STL)
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (WSH)
MTL
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [RFA Rights]
3.
ANA
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. 2020 1st round pick (COL)
4.
COL
  1. 2021 4th round pick (NJD)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the COL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$79,731,234$0$5,425,000$1,768,766

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:25 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 3,223
That team is nasty.
Richard88 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,640
Likes: 2,513
Scary scary scary. No need the playoffs, just hand them the cup
Richard88 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:33 p.m.
#3
Rangers 2023
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 19,043
Likes: 5,430
This is worth the eventual collapse, this is insanity
Dan10900 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:36 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,138
Likes: 5,938
If I was Bob Murray I'd take that in a heartbeat
Dan10900 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
#5
Snake97
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 827
Likes: 42
Sam Girard has to be on a power play unit.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:49 p.m.
#6
Rangers 2023
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 19,043
Likes: 5,430
Quoting: Jakethesnake97
Sam Girard has to be on a power play unit.


Lmfao where? (Should be comphers spot)
Apr. 18, 2020 at 1:50 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
A future dynasty in the making, That's for sure.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 2:25 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 710
How do you resign 3 key players the following year though
Xqb15 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 2:36 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
The only problem w/Pietrangelo signing is that it totally hamstrings the team. How do you sign Makar and Landeskog? I really do like the Rackell move though.
Hockey91 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 3:09 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Jakethesnake97
Sam Girard has to be on a power play unit.

Yeah I agree Girard has the quality to play PP, but there's only so many roles and I'd prefer other Dmen there. On the brighside, keeping Girard off the PP allows him to play big even strength minutes.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 3:12 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Salzy
If I was Bob Murray I'd take that in a heartbeat

The trade I made is a bit of an overpay, but my logic for that trade is that Rakell's value will be really high with a lower-than-expected cap, and Anaheim would surely have numerous suitors, so it is what would be needed to get it done. Anaheim need a good young RHD too so it's a good fit. I hesitated on trading Timmins, but if we sign Pietrangelo then Timmins is expendable and it's the logical move to pick up a top 6 forward.
Salzy liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 4:23 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Xqb15
The only problem w/Pietrangelo signing is that it totally hamstrings the team. How do you sign Makar and Landeskog? I really do like the Rackell move though.

I agree that it would make things really challenging going forwards, but I think there are definitely ways to make it work.

First of all, here's an estimate of what the 3 contracts could realistically look like:

Grubauer: $3.3m ----> $4m
Makar: $880k + $2.5m bonus (which is included in the caphit of the team above), total $3.3m ---> $9m
Landeskog: $5.5m -----> $8m

That's a total of $8.9m to find to resign those 3 players.

To start with, a big part of the strategy would center around the Expansion Draft in 2021:

- Forwards protected: Mackinnon, Rantanen, Landeskog, Kadri, Rakell, Burakovsky, Donskoi
- Defensemen: Makar, Girard, Pietrangelo (Johnson asked to waive NMC)
- Goalie: Grubauer

Key players exposed: Compher, Graves, Johnson, Francouz

The key here would be to get Seattle to pick one of Compher or Johnson as Graves/Francouz are more valuable at their cap hits and positions. Realistically Seattle wouldn't want Johnson at his cap hit, so we could for example pay Seattle a pick to choose Compher instead of one of Graves/Francouz.

Moves to make room would include:

1. Current capspace = $380k
2. Compher gets taken in the Expansion Draft (perhaps we pay Seattle to choose him instead of Francouz/Graves). Bowers (ELC) replaces Compher ($3.5m) for 2021-22, saving $2.6m.
3. Kadri ($4.5m/1year) gets traded, and is replaced by Newhook (ELC), saving $3.6m.
4. Calvert ($2.85m) leaves as an UFA and is replaced by O'Connor/Kovalenko/Kamenev/etc on ELC's, saving $2m.

The 4 points above total ~$8.6m. That's just short of $8.9m needed, but basically in the ballpark to make it work.

Note that I haven't even touched Johnson's $6m caphit yet. If needed this can be removed either via trade (perhaps attach him to Kadri in a trade); or by paying Seattle a pick to pick him; or by buyout (which would cost $2m for 4 more seasons). Either way any of those moves create considerable additional space even beyond what is needed to resign Makar/Grubauer/Landeskog as outlined in the 4 points above. If Johnson were traded there would be up to $6m free to sign a replacement #6D and invest elsewhere on the roster. If Johnson is moved it may even allow us to keep Kadri, but for arguments sake let's just go with Kadri getting traded.

With those moves, the 2021-22 roster would look like this:

Landeskog --- Mackinnon --- Rantanen
Rakell ----------- Newhook ---- Burakovsky
Nichuskin ------- Bowers ----- Donskoi
O'Connor ------ Bellemare --- Kaut (Bellemare resigned or equivalent 4C signed in UFA for $1.8m)

Girard --- Pietrangelo
Byram --- Makar
Graves --- New guy ($2m)

Grubauer
Francouz

Granted, rolling with a young center tandem in Newhook and Bowers would be a risk, but it isn't unreasonable to expect them to be able to step in and contribute right away after one more year of development in the AHL/NCAA (and possibly even a call up in 2020-21 already.

The next headaches would be in 2022 when Byram (ELC) , Rakell ($3.7m), and Francouz ($2m) need to be resigned. Hopefully Annunen (ELC) will be ready for a backup role by then to fill the backup goalie spot; that's 2 years away and he's already playing against men in Finland so it's not unfathomable to expect that. The savings from Johnson's contract being moved (i.e. $6m, minus $2m needed for a replacement 6D) would go towards Rakell's raise (probably around $1.8m if he asks for $5.5m), as well as for Byram who would get a bridge deal. Further capspace could be found by moving Donskoi's $3.9m when he has 1 year left to UFA (as well as by any rises in cap ceiling by 2022).

In 2023 it's game over for the stacked roster when Mackinnon needs his raise.

Obviously this strategy depends on Byram, Newhook, Bowers, Kaut, and one 4th line prospect working out, but it's not unreasonable to expect that they will.
Xqb15 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 5:05 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: Richard88
I agree that it would make things really challenging going forwards, but I think there are definitely ways to make it work.

First of all, here's an estimate of what the 3 contracts could realistically look like:

Grubauer: $3.3m ----> $4m
Makar: $880k + $2.5m bonus (which is included in the caphit of the team above), total $3.3m ---> $9m
Landeskog: $5.5m -----> $8m

That's a total of $8.9m to find to resign those 3 players.

To start with, a big part of the strategy would center around the Expansion Draft in 2021:

- Forwards protected: Mackinnon, Rantanen, Landeskog, Kadri, Rakell, Burakovsky, Donskoi
- Defensemen: Makar, Girard, Pietrangelo (Johnson asked to waive NMC)
- Goalie: Grubauer

Key players exposed: Compher, Graves, Johnson, Francouz

The key here would be to get Seattle to pick one of Compher or Johnson as Graves/Francouz are more valuable at their cap hits and positions. Realistically Seattle wouldn't want Johnson at his cap hit, so we could for example pay Seattle a pick to choose Compher instead of one of Graves/Francouz.

Moves to make room would include:

1. Current capspace = $380k
2. Compher gets taken in the Expansion Draft (perhaps we pay Seattle to choose him instead of Francouz/Graves). Bowers (ELC) replaces Compher ($3.5m) for 2021-22, saving $2.6m.
3. Kadri ($4.5m/1year) gets traded, and is replaced by Newhook (ELC), saving $3.6m.
4. Calvert ($2.85m) leaves as an UFA and is replaced by O'Connor/Kovalenko/Kamenev/etc on ELC's, saving $2m.

The 4 points above total ~$8.6m. That's just short of $8.9m needed, but basically in the ballpark to make it work.

Note that I haven't even touched Johnson's $6m caphit yet. If needed this can be removed either via trade (perhaps attach him to Kadri in a trade); or by paying Seattle a pick to pick him; or by buyout (which would cost $2m for 4 more seasons). Either way any of those moves create considerable additional space even beyond what is needed to resign Makar/Grubauer/Landeskog as outlined in the 4 points above. If Johnson were traded there would be up to $6m free to sign a replacement #6D and invest elsewhere on the roster. If Johnson is moved it may even allow us to keep Kadri, but for arguments sake let's just go with Kadri getting traded.

With those moves, the 2021-22 roster would look like this:

Landeskog --- Mackinnon --- Rantanen
Rakell ----------- Newhook ---- Burakovsky
Nichuskin ------- Bowers ----- Donskoi
O'Connor ------ Bellemare --- Kaut (Bellemare resigned or equivalent 4C signed in UFA for $1.8m)

Girard --- Pietrangelo
Byram --- Makar
Graves --- New guy ($2m)

Grubauer
Francouz

Granted, rolling with a young center tandem in Newhook and Bowers would be a risk, but it isn't unreasonable to expect them to be able to step in and contribute right away after one more year of development in the AHL/NCAA (and possibly even a call up in 2020-21 already.

The next headaches would be in 2022 when Byram (ELC) , Rakell ($3.7m), and Francouz ($2m) need to be resigned. Hopefully Annunen (ELC) will be ready for a backup role by then to fill the backup goalie spot; that's 2 years away and he's already playing against men in Finland so it's not unfathomable to expect that. The savings from Johnson's contract being moved (i.e. $6m, minus $2m needed for a replacement 6D) would go towards Rakell's raise (probably around $1.8m if he asks for $5.5m), as well as for Byram who would get a bridge deal. Further capspace could be found by moving Donskoi's $3.9m when he has 1 year left to UFA (as well as by any rises in cap ceiling by 2022).

In 2023 it's game over for the stacked roster when Mackinnon needs his raise.

Obviously this strategy depends on Byram, Newhook, Bowers, Kaut, and one 4th line prospect working out, but it's not unreasonable to expect that they will.


If Pietrangelo were 27 I could get behind that, but you’re talking about paying a guy $9M yr until he is 37, and at a spot where you’ve used 2 top 5 picks in the last 3 years. Let those guy be your horses, as Makar is already the teams 2nd most important player and the money that you would be paying an aging Pietrangelo goes to those guys. Otherwise I’m lock step with you.
Richard88 liked this.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 5:43 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Xqb15
If Pietrangelo were 27 I could get behind that, but you’re talking about paying a guy $9M yr until he is 37, and at a spot where you’ve used 2 top 5 picks in the last 3 years. Let those guy be your horses, as Makar is already the teams 2nd most important player and the money that you would be paying an aging Pietrangelo goes to those guys. Otherwise I’m lock step with you.

Pietrangelo has already got his cup, but the prospect of playing on a team as stacked as the one above might be incredibly enticing for him, so I think at $9m it might be possible for a contender to get him on a 6 year deal rather than 7.

Whatever the case, as long as there aren't any strict NTC's on the contract we could ride him for 3 seasons and then trade him in 2023 when Mackinnon needs his raise. At 33 Pietrangelo would still hold decent value in a trade, and that timeline would dovetail with Helleson who could start his ELC by or around 2023.
Apr. 18, 2020 at 7:38 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Here's what the roster would look like in 2021-22 with the changes suggested above, albeit while keeping Kadri instead of trading him for futures: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/1708652
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll