SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Richard1972

Created by: Loxley_1972
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: May 9, 2020
Published: May 9, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$700,000
2$2,500,000
2$1,800,000
2$1,800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
1$700,000
1$1,000,000
3$3,000,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Wallmark, Lucas [RFA Rights]
FLA
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Allen, Jake
  2. Parayko, Colton
Additional Details:
Allen is acquired and bought out or traded
3.
TOR
  1. 2020 3rd round pick (DET)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DET
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$82,471,450$0$0$28,550
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,350,000$4,350,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 9, 2020 at 9:04 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,604
Likes: 15,037
STL says no
May 9, 2020 at 9:12 a.m.
#2
XXX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
STL says no


why?

They got #1D, 1st rounder and mid-6 forward for #1D and backup.. unless you are telling me that backup to be bought out is worth 1st and mid-6 forward thats bullcrap.
BluesBandit liked this.
May 9, 2020 at 9:21 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,604
Likes: 15,037
Quoting: SammyT_51
why?

They got #1D, 1st rounder and mid-6 forward for #1D and backup.. unless you are telling me that backup to be bought out is worth 1st and mid-6 forward thats bullcrap.


If the goal is to move Parayko and keep Pietrangelo, this doesn't save enough money and I'd bet they prefer Parayko to Rielly. after considering adding the salary of the new backup, even at league minimum its under 1 million in savings

They have plenty of forward depth before adding a 3 million plus injured forward who will turn 26 early in the season and has only played 125 games.

Its a first in 2021 and will be very late.

Not worth it.
May 9, 2020 at 9:21 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 491
Quoting: SammyT_51
why?

They got #1D, 1st rounder and mid-6 forward for #1D and backup.. unless you are telling me that backup to be bought out is worth 1st and mid-6 forward thats bullcrap.


Yeah this offer is what it would take. Maybe we ask for Lilijren instead of Johnsson but either probably works. Props to you sir for not lowballing Parayko.
May 9, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If the goal is to move Parayko and keep Pietrangelo, this doesn't save enough money and I'd bet they prefer Parayko to Rielly. after considering adding the salary of the new backup, even at league minimum its under 1 million in savings

They have plenty of forward depth before adding a 3 million plus injured forward who will turn 26 early in the season and has only played 125 games.

Its a first in 2021 and will be very late.

Not worth it.


Maybe I did not add this in description but the buyout St-louis would get could then be used on Steen who is making almost 6mil.....that would give them plenty of room for a backup and either keep Johnsson or not even take him.....basically I am doing rielly for parayko and backup for the 1 round pick.....if they dont want Johnsson then maybe leafs have to add
May 9, 2020 at 9:31 a.m.
#6
XXX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: BluesBandit
Yeah this offer is what it would take. Maybe we ask for Lilijren instead of Johnsson but either probably works. Props to you sir for not lowballing Parayko.


It depends on what you call lowballing since Rielly for Parayko makes sense from value perspective imo (you are basically exchanging Top-10 LHD for Top-10 RHD) but Blues would want Liljegren in there so I can see that happening when Liljegren moves in that trade. How about this..

To TOR:
Parayko
mid draft pick of some sorts

To STL:
Rielly
Liljegren
May 9, 2020 at 9:32 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: BluesBandit
Yeah this offer is what it would take. Maybe we ask for Lilijgren instead of Johnsson but either probably works. Props to you sir for not lowballing Parayko.


thanks...trying to make honest trade for both...I think each teams D would be good....if as the other comenter mentioned they have no cap to sign Pietrangelo maybe they dont take Johnsson and we add Liljegren or something else to allow Blues to to have space to sign backup...plan was that Blues also have option to not take Johnsson and also buyout STeen giving them lots of cap then
May 9, 2020 at 9:34 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,604
Likes: 15,037
Quoting: Loxley_1972
Maybe I did not add this in description but the buyout St-louis would get could then be used on Steen who is making almost 6mil.....that would give them plenty of room for a backup and either keep Johnsson or not even take him.....basically I am doing rielly for parayko and backup for the 1 round pick.....if they dont want Johnsson then maybe leafs have to add


If there are buyouts, which i doubt
May 9, 2020 at 9:36 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: SammyT_51
It depends on what you call lowballing since Rielly for Parayko makes sense from value perspective imo (you are basically exchanging Top-10 LHD for Top-10 RHD) but Blues would want Liljegren in there so I can see that happening when Liljegren moves in that trade. How about this..

To TOR:
Parayko
mid draft pick of some sorts

To STL:
Rielly
Liljegren


i'd be fine with that as well.…..could send then whatever pick we get by trading Johnsson,,,,again dont forget blues also have option to buyout Steen...which is why I was sending Johnsson to replace Steen
May 9, 2020 at 9:40 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If there are buyouts, which i doubt


Well obviously....as I stated at the beginning.....isn't this all for fun until we know what is happening.....no buyouts and none of this happens....just tired of the Severson and Murphy trade proposals
May 9, 2020 at 9:44 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,183
Likes: 1,642
Quoting: SammyT_51
why?

They got #1D, 1st rounder and mid-6 forward for #1D and backup.. unless you are telling me that backup to be bought out is worth 1st and mid-6 forward thats bullcrap.


Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If the goal is to move Parayko and keep Pietrangelo, this doesn't save enough money and I'd bet they prefer Parayko to Rielly. after considering adding the salary of the new backup, even at league minimum its under 1 million in savings

They have plenty of forward depth before adding a 3 million plus injured forward who will turn 26 early in the season and has only played 125 games.

Its a first in 2021 and will be very late.

Not worth it.


Quoting: BluesBandit
Yeah this offer is what it would take. Maybe we ask for Lilijren instead of Johnsson but either probably works. Props to you sir for not lowballing Parayko.


Quoting: Loxley_1972
Maybe I did not add this in description but the buyout St-louis would get could then be used on Steen who is making almost 6mil.....that would give them plenty of room for a backup and either keep Johnsson or not even take him.....basically I am doing rielly for parayko and backup for the 1 round pick.....if they dont want Johnsson then maybe leafs have to add
May 9, 2020 at 9:48 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,183
Likes: 1,642
Quoting: Boomer125


Just so we're all clear a Reilly Parayko is a 1 for 1 in value nothing added by either team - the above is an overpayment by the Leafs and for what the privilege to buy out Allen? I will say this St Louis probably has little interest in moving Parayko but if they resign Pietrangelo than sending Parayko to TO for Reilly makes some good sense - Offensively Reilly > Parayko , Defensively it's the other way around
May 9, 2020 at 9:55 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: Boomer125
Just so we're all clear a Reilly Parayko is a 1 for 1 in value nothing added by either team - the above is an overpayment by the Leafs and for what the privilege to buy out Allen? I will say this St Louis probably has little interest in moving Parayko but if they resign Pietrangelo than sending Parayko to TO for Reilly makes some good sense - Offensively Reilly > Parayko , Defensively it's the other way around


I always prefer to add more going over to other team than not enough....it is basically rielly for Parayko......and I see them even as well...one more offensive one more defensive....taking allen back is not ideal but it is what is needed to allow the blues to have cap space to sign Pietrangelo who as much as all leaf fans would love I dont believe is an option in Toronto....this deal balances out both teams D and solves our last of size and RD side as we have plenty of LD....and like ya said blues might not be keen on trading Parayko but if they get a sweetner and can keep their captain they might be interested..we are gonna have issues signing Rielly in a couple of years and he is left handed....may as well have that same problem with a right hand shot that everyone thinks we need
May 9, 2020 at 10:06 a.m.
#14
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,349
Likes: 9,276
What?!?! We don’t want Allen. Payanko for Rielly is fair. So we trade 2 firsts for Allen? No
palhal liked this.
May 9, 2020 at 10:43 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 491
Quoting: Saskleaf
What?!?! We don’t want Allen. Payanko for Rielly is fairr. So we trade 2 firsts for Allen? No

No, it’s not. That’s why every Blues fan declines Parayko for Rielly straight up. That’s why you see so many trades for Parayko on this site and not Rielly.
May 9, 2020 at 10:57 a.m.
#16
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,769
Likes: 1,626
two huge L's for the leafs
palhal liked this.
May 9, 2020 at 1:06 p.m.
#17
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,924
Likes: 23,463
More silly RHD obsession. Reilly for Parayko...both have two years till UFA...that's about any even deal. But to expect the Leafs to give up a cheap ELC who they are depending upon for the future, Liljegren and a first. Crazy bad for the Leafs,
And the post isn't cap compliant. LTIR Allen and Johnsson just can't happen.
May 9, 2020 at 4:22 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: palhal
More silly RHD obsession. Reilly for Parayko...both have two years till UFA...that's about any even deal. But to expect the Leafs to give up a cheap ELC who they are depending upon for the future, Liljegren and a first. Crazy bad for the Leafs,
And the post isn't cap compliant. LTIR Allen and Johnsson just can't happen.


Silly or not it's what every body talks about.....Liljegren is not that great and with the D we have this way would not need him....like I said before I always add more in a trade to make sure no one comes back and says I over evaluated the Leafs players....so maybe the first is not needed......Allen is on LTIR as I said he would be bought out in order to make the trade happen.....dont think he is an improvement ….Johnsson is on LTIR simply because I did not bother to try to drop him on some other team for a pick
May 9, 2020 at 4:27 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: Saskleaf
What?!?! We don’t want Allen. Payanko for Rielly is fair. So we trade 2 firsts for Allen? No


what are you talking about? I did not trade 2 firsts.....unless you mean Liljegren…..because If you are then you give him 2 much credit...I do not seeing him being a 1 or 2 D for us....I think he will eventually slot in between 4 and 6.....and it's not like the pick I did send would be a top 5.....would be late round pick..may as well be a 2nd....time is ticking on the core 4.....so need to stock up now on defense and I think this drastically improves the team
May 9, 2020 at 4:31 p.m.
#20
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,924
Likes: 23,463
Quoting: Loxley_1972
Silly or not it's what every body talks about.....Liljegren is not that great and with the D we have this way would not need him....like I said before I always add more in a trade to make sure no one comes back and says I over evaluated the Leafs players....so maybe the first is not needed......Allen is on LTIR as I said he would be bought out in order to make the trade happen.....dont think he is an improvement ….Johnsson is on LTIR simply because I did not bother to try to drop him on some other team for a pick


Wow, if you're logic is to buy out Allen then show him as a buyout which costs cap, not as LTIR. And certaInly you can't trade Allen without takin cap back in a deal. You're right Liljegren isn't that great, but his progression is the same as the other Dmen in his draft class. No reason he isn't going to be an NHLer and do give up a first rounder too. Thanks for agreeing, silly RHD obsession, to obtain at any cost.
So what if Liljegren isn't a top pairing Dman (whatever that means), as you suggest he's 4 to 6 Dman which still might be 18 minutes a night.
May 9, 2020 at 4:43 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: palhal
Wow, if you're logic is to buy out Allen then show him as a buyout which costs cap, not as LTIR. And certaInly you can't trade Allen without takin cap back in a deal. You're right Liljegren isn't that great, but his progression is the same as the other Dmen in his draft class. No reason he isn't going to be an NHLer and do give up a first rounder too. Thanks for agreeing, silly RHD obsession, to obtain at any cost.
So what if Liljegren isn't a top pairing Dman (whatever that means), as you suggest he's 4 to 6 Dman which still might be 18 minutes a night.


Ok for the Allen buyout I am talking the league awarding each team a buyout that does not retain any cap space.....maybe I am calling it the wrong kind of buyout....I did write buyout in the trade...I guess you did not comprehend that.....as for Liljegren we would need him as we still have Holl,Dermott,Demelo Lehtonen and Sandin who will be better suited for those roles....I said Liljegren 4-6 was being generous....doubt he ever gets off the 3rd pairing...which we could plug anybody in at that point....I had to add a little extra as everyone would have said Parayko is worth more than Rielly….so add and subtract whatever you want....the main part here is to get Parayko for Rielly and Allen to allow the Blues to be able to resign Pietrangelo…..once of course they buyout Steen whose production has dropped considering his cap hit
May 9, 2020 at 5:26 p.m.
#22
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,349
Likes: 9,276
Quoting: Loxley_1972
what are you talking about? I did not trade 2 firsts.....unless you mean Liljegren…..because If you are then you give him 2 much credit...I do not seeing him being a 1 or 2 D for us....I think he will eventually slot in between 4 and 6.....and it's not like the pick I did send would be a top 5.....would be late round pick..may as well be a 2nd....time is ticking on the core 4.....so need to stock up now on defense and I think this drastically improves the team


It’s still a first, even if it’s not in the top 5. Why waste it on Allen? And why is Liljegren a bust? He has not fallen too far in value, if at all. Yes, I considered him a first.
May 9, 2020 at 8:41 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 401
Likes: 74
Quoting: Saskleaf
It’s still a first, even if it’s not in the top 5. Why waste it on Allen? And why is Liljegren a bust? He has not fallen too far in value, if at all. Yes, I considered him a first.


So maybe it is an overpay....if you think it's an over pay then great....means the trade proposal met what was fair and beyond......maybe a first and Liljegren is too much...I just rate Parayko as worth more than Rielly…..my previous deal did not have Liljegren in it...it had Johnsson and a first....but then people said Johnsson would be useless to them and not fit under cap....so I pulled him out and added Liljegren…..the first was left....so it might be overkill.....as for your opinion on what and where Liljegren is or will be is just that....your opinion.....I don't value him as much as others do.....he seems to be showing why he dropped so far down.....I don't think he and Sandin will be our 1 & 2 D of the future....in fact if I could flip Sandin for someone else I would...another young right shot D
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll