Mahura the most, idk never really thought of trading him, Guhle has a bit more than Larsson, but I'd like to get a second back for each

I don't think a 2nd helps either one of those teams.
BOS is win now, and I think AZ would have liked to been.
Maybe they can use it to trade with later but I think that defeats the point of what a real cost would be.

I think those are just the first 3 teams after the Ducks. I would like to trade one of Guhle/Larsson for a similar RHD if were getting a pick back I wouldn’t take less than a third for either but my ask would be a second as @AFOX10900

Late 2nd-3rd for Mahura. A 3rd or less for the other two, imo. Why do you ask? Is there a specific team that you were thinking about trading any of them to? If so, it might be easier to suggest a value if we knew what we were working with.

As a canucks fan i would kinda like one of them for stecher. I just don't know how far off each of them are in value. What do they all project to be? How much of a difference are there between each of them?

It seems like they are all carbon copies from what people are saying here

Mahura is definitely the best (should be a solid top 4 guy), Larsson I don't see anything in, but bc GM's be like muh "intangibles" and muh G R I T and whatnot, I'd like to get a second back, Guhle is just kind of in between, likely becomes a high end bottom pair guy with middle pair capabilities in the right situation (like Stecher lol)

Also they play in three entirely different ways, Mahura is all out offense, Guhle decent in both ends Larsson is a pure DFD (who's not all that great at actually defending)

Okay, well Stecher holds the most value of the four, hands down. I honestly don't see Larsson becoming more than a bottom pair guy. He hasn't exactly been blessed with great partners, but he really hasn't done much to impress in his role, either. I'm not as informed about the other two, but for what it's worth, Dobber projects Guhle as a 3rd pair and Mahura as 2nd pair. I'd personally target Mahura; younger, higher ceiling, more skilled. He'd be my guy.

If he can get Mahura, sure. Canucks need a guy of a similar skill set as Stecher but without the imminent and immediate payday. I'd be happy with Larsson if he can fill the spot on the third pair left side whilst making a low cap hit salary.

Other ducks fans won’t agree but I think Larsson has the highest value of the 3. There’s a reason he was the on that played all year while the other 2 were in SD. I still point to a game in 18-19 when Fowler and Lindholm we’re out and Larsson played with Manson vs the McDavid line. They didn’t give up much to McDavid. Only goal against was a bad pk TO by I think Cogliano (wasn’t Larsson or Manson) that I think McDavid got a point on. Ducks won. I think he still has the potential to at least be a #4 defensive D with decent puck moving. Guhle and Mahura are puck movers best suited for a high flying team. Guhle can flat out skate and Mahura can pass the puck but both struggle in their own end and none have a great shot.

I think the ducks should move 2 of the 3. One for a like RD maybe a Honka type. And the other packaged with Jones for a youngish scorer.

4th pick for Larsson;
5th for Magura
and Guhle to waivers