SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canadiens fans would you accept

Created by: kafle22
Team: 2020-21 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: May 14, 2020
Published: May 14, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
EDM
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (STL)
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (MTL)
MTL
  1. 2020 1st round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
17$81,500,000$71,692,699$341,534$230,000$9,807,301
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$875,000$875,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,150,000$2,150,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$915,000$915,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$230,000$230K)
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Who would win this trade
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


May 14, 2020 at 12:29 a.m.
#1
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 16,131
Likes: 20,442
Edited May 14, 2020 at 12:44 a.m.
Hell no

Edit : woah my bad I thought we were trading OUR first for two 2nds
May 14, 2020 at 12:31 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Yes if there a player we really want at that spot!
May 14, 2020 at 12:33 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Kafle
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 483
Quoting: SevenLeg
Hell no

Care to explain?
Cause your getting pick number 23 for pick number 39 and 61
May 14, 2020 at 12:40 a.m.
#4
Trade is one for one
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 537
Likes: 169
Quoting: kafle22
Care to explain?
Cause your getting pick number 23 for pick number 39 and 61
pick 20 currently*
May 14, 2020 at 12:41 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1,448
Quoting: kafle22
Care to explain?
Cause your getting pick number 23 for pick number 39 and 61


It all depends on who’s at 23. For example foerster or Perrault than I think that’s a good gamble. If both are gone I don’t see anyone worth it
HabsForEver liked this.
May 14, 2020 at 12:43 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,728
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: kafle22
Care to explain?
Cause your getting pick number 23 for pick number 39 and 61


dumb trade for whoever has 23. Cost of moving from 39 to 23 is like pick 37.
Bluetomorrow83 liked this.
May 14, 2020 at 1:07 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 1,489
Edited May 14, 2020 at 1:27 a.m.
It's honestly easy yes for MTL. That's a big jump.. Normally trading down in this area would be like ~5 spots for a mid 2nd. So pick #20 equals pick #25 and pick in #50 range, Prefect recent example of this was 2018 draft NYR/OTT trade #22 for #26 and #48. MTL needs to add quite a bit honestly. EDM #20 for MTL #39 and CHI #40 is probably closer to correct value but still short. Moving up is expensive
May 14, 2020 at 7:51 p.m.
#8
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 6,450
I'm still in agreeance with @CD282: the player Edmonton selects at #20 is too worthwhile to trade away for second round picks. Puljujarvi and Benning need to be the pieces used to bring in additional picks.
CD282 liked this.
May 14, 2020 at 7:55 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 2,240
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
I'm still in agreeance with @CD282: the player Edmonton selects at #20 is too worthwhile to trade away for second round picks. Puljujarvi and Benning need to be the pieces used to bring in additional picks.


Considering the depth of this years draft, I don't see a big difference between 20 and a very early 2nd. There's going to be drop obviously, but it's not sa big as you would think. Whoever trades down wins 99% of the trades this year unless there is a serious slide.
May 14, 2020 at 7:59 p.m.
#10
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 6,450
Quoting: HabsForEver
Considering the depth of this years draft, I don't see a big difference between 20 and a very early 2nd. There's going to be drop obviously, but it's not sa big as you would think. Whoever trades down wins 99% of the trades this year unless there is a serious slide.


Most of the right-handed centers (one of the things Edmonton's system desperately lacks) available at #20 have top-six potential. The same cannot be said for the players available in the second round.

Also, that's not really how draft depth works. It's more akin to how many near-bonafide first line players exist at the top of the draft. This year, it dips into about the early 20's. The residual effect of middle sixers and role players being more readily available into the second round happens yes, but largely it just means there's more quality at the top.
CD282 liked this.
May 14, 2020 at 9:48 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 2,240
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Most of the right-handed centers (one of the things Edmonton's system desperately lacks) available at #20 have top-six potential. The same cannot be said for the players available in the second round.

Also, that's not really how draft depth works. It's more akin to how many near-bonafide first line players exist at the top of the draft. This year, it dips into about the early 20's. The residual effect of middle sixers and role players being more readily available into the second round happens yes, but largely it just means there's more quality at the top.


For sure but we aren't talking about the top end of the draft. We are talking around 20-45 where it's mostly 2nd line potential guys. It's like going from Samuel Poulin to Raphael Lavoie. Yeah, it's a drop, but they both have similar ceilings.
May 14, 2020 at 10:04 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 6,692
The easiest and really only way to validate something like this is to see if something similar happened in history before. Judging from what I've quickly looked up I think Habs would do this in a New York minute and Edmonton would be unwise to.

Based on previous history, it would be closer to the Habs 39th & 40th pick for 23rd.

It really all depends on whose available as that spot that is the driving force behind a team willing to make a trade like this. It has more to do with a MTL really liking someone they feel is that range all while EDM feeling that the players available at 23 are no better that the ones in the 39-40 range. All depends on scouting reports and GM's motives really.
May 15, 2020 at 7:54 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,646
Quoting: HabsForEver
Considering the depth of this years draft, I don't see a big difference between 20 and a very early 2nd. There's going to be drop obviously, but it's not sa big as you would think. Whoever trades down wins 99% of the trades this year unless there is a serious slide.


I've read scouts who think the "depth" of this draft is in the first 23-25 players, after that there's a drop-off. Many drafts have only 15-20 players of that caliber, this one has 7 or 8 more.

Trading down from #20 would be a significant loss in value.
May 15, 2020 at 7:59 a.m.
#14
Habs/Pens fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 852
Likes: 273
Sure as a Habs fan yes.
May 15, 2020 at 8:27 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,771
Likes: 7,646
Quoting: F50marco
The easiest and really only way to validate something like this is to see if something similar happened in history before. Judging from what I've quickly looked up I think Habs would do this in a New York minute and Edmonton would be unwise to.

Based on previous history, it would be closer to the Habs 39th & 40th pick for 23rd.

It really all depends on whose available as that spot that is the driving force behind a team willing to make a trade like this. It has more to do with a MTL really liking someone they feel is that range all while EDM feeling that the players available at 23 are no better that the ones in the 39-40 range. All depends on scouting reports and GM's motives really.


Moving from #23 (likely #20, BTW) to #39 is going to cost a lost more than #40. That's a move of sixteen spots.

Looking at the past 2 drafts confirms this:

2019

- PHI moved #11 for #14 + #45. Moving back 3 picks cost ARI a mid-2nd.

2018

- TOR moved #25 for #29 + #76. Moving up 4 picks in the late 1st round cost STL a mid-3rd. This appears to be the weakest of the deals in the past 2 years.
- OTT moved #22 for #26 + #48. Moving up 4 picks in the late 1st cost NYR a mid-2nd.

No way any savvy GM is going to trade out of the first round and down 16-19 spots for just a mid-2nd. Clearly past transactions indicate that the #20 pick is worth much more than that.

MIN holds #25 and #42 while SJS has #28 and #34. These would be more realistic returns for #23, but if Edmonton has #20 (as they do by points percentage) I don't think it would be worth giving up for either of those deals.
F50marco liked this.
May 15, 2020 at 8:58 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 6,692
Quoting: CD282
Moving from #23 (likely #20, BTW) to #39 is going to cost a lost more than #40. That's a move of sixteen spots.

Looking at the past 2 drafts confirms this:

2019

- PHI moved #11 for #14 + #45. Moving back 3 picks cost ARI a mid-2nd.

2018

- TOR moved #25 for #29 + #76. Moving up 4 picks in the late 1st round cost STL a mid-3rd. This appears to be the weakest of the deals in the past 2 years.
- OTT moved #22 for #26 + #48. Moving up 4 picks in the late 1st cost NYR a mid-2nd.

No way any savvy GM is going to trade out of the first round and down 16-19 spots for just a mid-2nd. Clearly past transactions indicate that the #20 pick is worth much more than that.

MIN holds #25 and #42 while SJS has #28 and #34. These would be more realistic returns for #23, but if Edmonton has #20 (as they do by points percentage) I don't think it would be worth giving up for either of those deals.


Yeah that looks about right. I didn't have time search up any of them but I remember those now and that looks about what I expect too.
CD282 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit