SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 Trades - TOR-MON-NYR

Created by: Cyras
Team: 2020-21 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: May 16, 2020
Published: May 16, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
3$2,000,000
1$975,000
1$950,000
4$5,000,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Manson, Josh ($2,000,000 retained)
2.
ANA
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (CHI)
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (MTL)
3.
ANA
  1. Deangelo, Anthony [RFA Rights]
NYR
  1. Larsson, Jacob [RFA Rights]
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (MTL)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$66,952,166$0$0$14,547,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$820,000$820,000
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$975,000$975,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 16, 2020 at 12:50 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 4,214
Likes: 5,077
Toronto takes that in about 3 seconds. 3.5 tops.
Terry_AkiSauce liked this.
May 16, 2020 at 12:56 p.m.
#2
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Not enough for ADA. It’ll take one of your better prospects to pry him away after the season he just had.
Root liked this.
May 16, 2020 at 1:00 p.m.
#3
Billy739
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 1,629
5.25m for 4 years for a player who averages 40 points and 20 goals ?
He's a higher paid version of MTL's Paul Byron averaging similar numbers.

I'd like JS because he's a a top 9 guy with consistency issues but still good
Byrons a bottom 6 guy who can play a 2nd line role for short stints during injury

I'd do a deal but i think it would have to be for less if ANA doesnt retain 2m atleast
I'd offer a 2021 2nd round pick and a 5th if ANA cant retain but Given the Cap space left in a rebuilding team
Its just easier to retain 2m and call it square
Pharow liked this.
May 16, 2020 at 1:06 p.m.
#4
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 1,045
This was obviously made by a Leafs fan
May 16, 2020 at 1:15 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 4,214
Likes: 5,077
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
This was obviously made by a Leafs fan


Actually no. He’s a ducks fan. Look it up
May 16, 2020 at 1:17 p.m.
#6
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 1,045
Quoting: Mitch1_6
Actually no. He’s a ducks fan. Look it up


Can't believe he'd want to move manson for kap 1 for 1
MitchMarner_16 liked this.
May 16, 2020 at 1:31 p.m.
#7
Breadman likes Bread
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 1,729
Rags say Hellllll no
May 16, 2020 at 1:33 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2016
Posts: 916
Likes: 221
Why would Rangers give up Tony D a proven top offensive defenseman in the NHL for an unproven defenseman with only a 2nd round pick ...thats crazy. Your so far off on value.
May 16, 2020 at 1:50 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 389
Quoting: Spanky227
Not enough for ADA. It’ll take one of your better prospects to pry him away after the season he just had.


You guys overvalue Tony wayyyy too much. Obviously the package is a little light but a top prospect? Not a chance.
May 16, 2020 at 1:52 p.m.
#10
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,297
Likes: 3,310
Dont think Habs gove you thier 2 earliest 2nd round picks for Silverberg. One 2nd for sure, but he is an expensive player that would be in our bottom 6 within a couple years.

Rangers dont even consider that offer.

Manson to the Leafs has been around for ever, always interesting to an Anaheim fans perspective
Pharow liked this.
May 16, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
#11
Next Gen
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 269
deangelo was on pace for 60 this year but was on pace for 42 last year he is expected to be 50-60 points right handed defenceman. This offer is horrible the starting offer you would need to throw up is rickard rakell and maybe a little more. You are not getting a 24 year old 42+ point defenceman.
May 16, 2020 at 2:32 p.m.
#12
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,881
Likes: 8,555
Why do we want Silf? ANSWER ME
May 16, 2020 at 2:46 p.m.
#13
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: Bloodykisame
deangelo was on pace for 60 this year but was on pace for 42 last year he is expected to be 50-60 points right handed defenceman. This offer is horrible the starting offer you would need to throw up is rickard rakell and maybe a little more. You are not getting a 24 year old 42+ point defenceman.


Deangelo also started 56% of his shifts in the ozone and yet still only had a corsi for % of 48. That’s not good.
May 16, 2020 at 5:49 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Cyras
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 258
Likes: 1
Moving Mason for Kapanen is simply because we are weaker in depth on the right side, he is young and can be a top 6 winger; while Mason is going to be 30 near the end of his contract and want a raise. No point in keeping him around during a rebuild even though we have no one really as a RHD, we can get someone younger, cheaper and build around them and let them develop with the rest of the youth. Sell him while he has value and yes I know Mason to leafs has been around for a long time, so why not give the leafs what they want in a cheap RHD and we get a younger winger on the right side instead of being over stocked with LW.

I feel everyone over values Deangelo... I am not saying he is bad, he is a great offensive D and with the Rangers already having a strong hold with Trouba & Fox, he will become the odd man out eventually. With him being an RFA and wanting a raise, it could be an option to move him. The rangers HAVE top 9 forwards in all positions and giving them someone like Jones, Steel, Comtois, Terry doesn't fill any need for areas they want to improve on. Steel isn't going to replace Strome, Zibanejad or Chytil. What do you want to do Rangers fans, have Kakko, Kravstov, Gautheir, Kreider, Panarin, Buchnevich, Lemuix and Howden bugger off for the likes of either Max's and Terry. Rangers need a LHD who is young and can fit their system. Larsson may not put up the points that Deangelo would BUT he sure can help them over the expensive aging Staal or Smith. Given that you also get a high round 2nd pick in a deep draft year when we are trading UNSIGNED RFA's I would say this is pretty fair.

Silfverberg has been on the Habs radar for a few years now. They have youth, they have talent but they need stability and consistency with a player who covers all areas of the ice, can pull off 40pts a season and still manage to shutdown top players while clocking 16-20 minutes a night. There isn't a prospect you would give up outside of another pick. Brook, Fleury and Juulsen are all players we would want in the trade, would you rather give them up over a two 2nd round picks. Maybe it would be St. Louis pick and either Habs or Hawks 2nd but given what other teams got for lesser players this is a deal that the Habs can afford to make without messing their prospects, system or future.
May 16, 2020 at 8:29 p.m.
#15
Next Gen
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 269
Quoting: Jah1722
Deangelo also started 56% of his shifts in the ozone and yet still only had a corsi for % of 48. That’s not good.


doesnt change he is a 3rd defencemen right now and one of the best offensive in the league. His value is still there any wont change because someone doesnt agree with it. You have to give to the teams needs and wants not just your own and favour as such.
May 16, 2020 at 9:00 p.m.
#16
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 2,894
Quoting: Bloodykisame
doesnt change he is a 3rd defencemen right now and one of the best offensive in the league. His value is still there any wont change because someone doesnt agree with it. You have to give to the teams needs and wants not just your own and favour as such.


Nothing that you said changes the fact that Deangelo is overrated based on his point total. How do you start that often in the ozone and still have a negative corsi?
May 17, 2020 at 2:09 a.m.
#17
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 1,045
Quoting: Cyras
Moving Mason for Kapanen is simply because we are weaker in depth on the right side, he is young and can be a top 6 winger; while Mason is going to be 30 near the end of his contract and want a raise. No point in keeping him around during a rebuild even though we have no one really as a RHD, we can get someone younger, cheaper and build around them and let them develop with the rest of the youth. Sell him while he has value and yes I know Mason to leafs has been around for a long time, so why not give the leafs what they want in a cheap RHD and we get a younger winger on the right side instead of being over stocked with LW.

I feel everyone over values Deangelo... I am not saying he is bad, he is a great offensive D and with the Rangers already having a strong hold with Trouba & Fox, he will become the odd man out eventually. With him being an RFA and wanting a raise, it could be an option to move him. The rangers HAVE top 9 forwards in all positions and giving them someone like Jones, Steel, Comtois, Terry doesn't fill any need for areas they want to improve on. Steel isn't going to replace Strome, Zibanejad or Chytil. What do you want to do Rangers fans, have Kakko, Kravstov, Gautheir, Kreider, Panarin, Buchnevich, Lemuix and Howden bugger off for the likes of either Max's and Terry. Rangers need a LHD who is young and can fit their system. Larsson may not put up the points that Deangelo would BUT he sure can help them over the expensive aging Staal or Smith. Given that you also get a high round 2nd pick in a deep draft year when we are trading UNSIGNED RFA's I would say this is pretty fair.

Silfverberg has been on the Habs radar for a few years now. They have youth, they have talent but they need stability and consistency with a player who covers all areas of the ice, can pull off 40pts a season and still manage to shutdown top players while clocking 16-20 minutes a night. There isn't a prospect you would give up outside of another pick. Brook, Fleury and Juulsen are all players we would want in the trade, would you rather give them up over a two 2nd round picks. Maybe it would be St. Louis pick and either Habs or Hawks 2nd but given what other teams got for lesser players this is a deal that the Habs can afford to make without messing their prospects, system or future.


As a ducks fan would you consider a package where the primary return for Manson was Dermott? Probably with the addition of picks/prospects but a young guy who is going to be cheap and under control for many years to come
May 17, 2020 at 6:54 p.m.
#18
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,088
Likes: 25,004
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
As a ducks fan would you consider a package where the primary return for Manson was Dermott? Probably with the addition of picks/prospects but a young guy who is going to be cheap and under control for many years to come


No. Dermott isn't anywhere near replacing Fowler or Lindholm soon and isn't clearly better than current LD's we are auditioning: Djoos and Larsson in particular, but both Josh Mahura and Jackson LaCombe are on the horizon. Not to mention the possibility that Brendan Guhle may pan out after all.
May 19, 2020 at 4:04 p.m.
#19
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Quoting: Arlotti47
You guys overvalue Tony wayyyy too much. Obviously the package is a little light but a top prospect? Not a chance.


I never said a top prospect. I simply said one of your better. And your best prospect isn’t necessarily a top prospect in the nhl.
May 19, 2020 at 4:07 p.m.
#20
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Quoting: Jah1722
Deangelo also started 56% of his shifts in the ozone and yet still only had a corsi for % of 48. That’s not good.


Rangers aren’t a possession team— everybody knows this. He’s +2 compared to the rest of his team. If you actually look at his defensive metrics he’s been good. Just saying, the offer is Larsson (look at his metrics I mean come on) and a 2nd just doesn’t move the needle
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll