1 | | - | | 1) Alexis Lafreniere (Undisputed number 1 overall pick) |
2 | | - | | 1) Tim Stutzle: Debate between Stutzle and Byfield. Sens go for more sure pick in Stutzle as they are talent deprived. Even though Byfield has more ceiling/potential, I see him as a potential of being a bust.
Other Options
2) Quinton Byfield: If developed properly and he reaches his potential, a dynamic duo of Byfield and Tkachuk would be deadly.
3) Lucas Raymond: Dynamic playmaking/agile winger who could bring some much needed skill to the Sens roster. |
3 | | | | 1) Lucas Raymond: Debate between Raymond and Byfield. Sens select Raymond as they already selected a center in Stutzle @ number 2. They go for the flash and dash/agility of Raymond over Byfield. Dynamic playmaking/agile winger who could bring some much needed skill to the Sens roster. A dynamic duo of Stutzle, Raymond, and Tkachuk on the first line would be great to see.
Other Options
2) Quinton Byfield: If developed properly and he reaches his potential, a dynamic duo of Byfield and Tkachuk would be deadly. In addition, a 1,2 duo at center in Byfield and Stutzle would be great to see.
3) Jamie Drysdale: Agile smart defenceman who has the ceiling/potential to be a top pairing defenceman alongside Chabot in the future if developed properly. |
4 | | - | | 1) Jamie Drysdale: Debate between Drysdale and Byfield. Kings have solid center prospects in Vilardi and Iafallo (who can play center and wing) in addition to having Kopitar at center. Due to that and the fact that there is the risk that Byfield might be a bust, they select Drysdale who is an agile/smart defeceman who could play on the first pairing with Drew Doughty.
Other Options
2) Quinton Byfield: If developed properly and he reaches his ceiling and potential, the Kings are set at center for now and the future and draft their #1 center of the future.
3) Yaroslav Askarov: Might be a bit of a reach for Kings to select him at 4th overall but it could be a justifiable pick if they selected him. They traded away Campbell to Toronto and Quick is getting older and has a history of injuries. Although they do strongly believe that Cal Peterson could potentially be a starter, it never hurts to have an insurance policy should Peterson not pan out. Also, I believe that Askarov has a higher chance of starting and being successful than Peterson. |
5 | | - | | 1) Alexander Holtz: Debate between Holtz and Byfield. Similarily to the Kings, the Ducks have a wealth of solid center prospects (Zegras and Lundestrom) and combining that with the fact that Byfield might be a bust, I do not see them selecting Byfield. I see them selecting a sniper in Holtz to play alongside Getzlaf and then one of their center prospects in Zegras or Lundestrom.
Other Options
2) Quinton Byfield: If developed properly and he reaches his ceiling and potential, the Ducks are set at center for now and the future and have their #1 center of the future.
3) Jack Quinn: Similar to Holtz in that he is also a sniper (although not as elite) but would still be a good option to play alongside Getzlaf and the Zegras or Lundestrom in the future. |
6 | | - | | 1) Jack Quinn: Debate between Quinn and Byfield. Devils already have Hischier and Hughes at center. Combine that with the fact that Byfield has the potential to be a bust, the Devils will select the second best sniper in the draft to play alongside either Hughes or Hischier and provide the Devils with some much needed offensive production.
Other Options
2) Quinton Byfield: If developed properly and he reaches his ceiling an potential, the Devils are set at center for now and the future. |
7 | | - | | |
8 | | - | | 1) Habs lose their minds yet again like last year when they picked Caufield. They finally select a #1 center that Bergevin says can't be traded for and now have a elite #1 center who has a chip on his shoulder to prove teams that passed him that they were wrong.
Other Options
2) Marco Rossi: Rossi is a skillful playmaking center who would bring some much needed skill to the Canadiens.
3) Yaroslav Askarov: This pick may be a reach. They do have an elite goaltender presently in Price along with a goalie of the future in Primeau. However, there is no guarantee that Primeau will be the goaltender of the future once Price is gone. Therefore, Askarov provides a good insurance policy who also has a much higher ceiling than Primeau at being a more successful starter. |
9 | | - | | 1) Yaroslav Askarov: After trading away Lehner at the deadline and Crawford reaching up there in terms of age, it would be smart for them to draft Askarov as their future #1 goaltender.
Other Options
2) Marco Rossi: Rossi is a skillful playmaking versatile forward who could either play as a winger or center and improve an already impressive top 6 of the Hawks.
3) Jake Sanderson: If Hawks dont want to draft a goaltender or forward, then they will select a potential top 4 defenceman to reinforce their defence that has aging defenceman in Keith and Seabrook. |
10 | | | | 1) Marco Rossi: Devils select Rossi and reunite him with Quinn. As they already have Hughes and Hischier at Center, they could have very creative line combinations by pairing Quinn and Rossi with one of Hughes or Hischier. They could also decide to play Quinn and Rossi on the same line with either Hughes or Hischier and have already built in chemistry.
Other Options
2) Dawson Mercer: Mercer is another elite offensive goalscorer and playmaker who could fit in perfectly alongside one of Hughes or Hischier.
3) Rodion Amirov: Amirov is another goal scoring option for the Devils to slot in alongside Hughes or Hischier. |
11 | | - | | 1) Anton Lundell: Wild tend to like 200 foot responsible centres with some offensive punch. Lundell fits this description as he is extremely smart and reliable and would slide instantly into their top 6.
Other Options
2) Dawson Mercer: Mercer is an elite offensive goalscorer and playmaker who could address the Wild's need for offence on the wings.
3) Rodion Amirov: Amirov is another goal scoring option for the Wild on the wings. |
12 | | - | | 1) Dawson Mercer: Canucks select an elite offensive forward in Mercer who adds to their impressive set of offensive wingers in Boeser and Miller.
Other Options
2) Noel Gunler: Gunler is a goal scorer option for the Canucks to select if they want more goal scoring.
3) Jake Sanderson: If the Canucks prefer not to select a winger, then they will pick Sanderson who when developed fully can be a solid two way top 4 defenceman for the Canucks. |
13 | | - | | 1) Rodion Amirov: Predators select another an elite goal scorer able to find open spaces on the ice to compliment their forwards in arvidsson and forsberg.
Other Options
2) Noel Gunler: Gunler is another goal scoring option for the Predators on the wings.
3) Jake Sanderson: If the Predators prefer not to select a winger, then they will pick Sanderson who when developed fully can be a solid two way top 4 defenceman for the Predators who can distribute the puck up to their skilled forwards. |
14 | | - | | 1) Jake Sanderson: Panthers select a two way top 4 defenceman who addresses their massive defence needs. Sanderson is a reliable defenceman who also has the ability to transition the puck up to their talented wingers.
Other Options
2) Jeremie Poirier: Poirier is more of an offensive defenceman who could transition the puck out much better and has a higher offensive upside than Sanderson but is not as defensively reliable.
3) Noel Gunler: If the Panthers do not want to address their forward needs and instead want to add to their already elite forward group, they could select another goal scorer in Gunler. |
15 | | - | | 1) Noel Guler: Flames select a much needed goal scorer to add to their already decent forward group and now have skill, agility, grit, and goalscoring in their top 6.
Other Options
2) Dylan Holloway: Flames could also select a 200 foot gritty center who has some offensive touch to play behind Sean Monahan. A pairing of Holloway and Tkachuk would be fun to watch.
3) Hendrix Lappiere: Flames could take a risk and select Lappiere who if the concussion issues are past him could be a 200 foot center with more offensive upside than Holloway. |
16 | | - | | |
17 | | - | | |
18 | | | | |
19 | | - | | |
20 | | | | |
21 | | | | |
22 | | - | | |
23 | | - | | |
24 | | - | | |
25 | | | | |
26 | | - | | |
27 | | - | | |
28 | | | | |
29 | | - | | |
30 | | - | | |
31 | | | | |