SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Very Strong Offseason

Created by: Rodzikhockey93
Team: 2020-21 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: May 21, 2020
Published: May 21, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,750,000
2$1,750,000
5$4,000,000
3$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
1$1,250,000
1$750,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Berggren, Jonatan [Reserve List]
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (DET)
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (EDM)
DET
    RFA rights to Georgiev
    2.
    NYR
    1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Reserve List]
    EDM
    1. Andersson, Lias
    2. 2020 4th round pick (NYR)
    3.
    NYR
    EDM
    1. Smith, Brendan
    Additional Details:
    cbo
    4.
    NYR
    1. Dermott, Travis [RFA Rights]
    TOR
    1. 2020 2nd round pick (DET)
    2. 2021 3rd round pick (NYR)
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the VAN
    2021
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    2022
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$73,433,133$0$8,062,500$8,066,867
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $11,642,857$11,642,857
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,350,000$5,350,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LW, RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
    RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $863,333$863,333
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    RW
    UFA - 1
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,700,000$5,700,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
    G
    UFA - 1
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $4,750,000$4,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    $750,000$750,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $750,000$750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 21, 2020 at 4:55 p.m.
    #1
    Dubas isnt a genius
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 2,824
    Likes: 681
    Toronto says no. No reason to trade our 23 yr old 2D unless it is involved in a deal that brings back something better.

    We could go Dermott + 3rd for Georgiyev though?
    May 21, 2020 at 4:57 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Georgiev trade looks right. Don't think a pick gets added to Puljujarvi and that's too much for Dermott.

    Also, your Strome contract is ooof. As is Howden at 3C and your UFA targets.

    So basically you get points for the Georgiev trade and everything else you've done is pretty rough.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:00 p.m.
    #3
    Dubas isnt a genius
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 2,824
    Likes: 681
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    Georgiev trade looks right. Don't think a pick gets added to Puljujarvi and that's too much for Dermott.

    Also, your Strome contract is ooof. As is Howden at 3C and your UFA targets.

    So basically you get points for the Georgiev trade and everything else you've done is pretty rough.


    It's not that the value isn't there for Toronto it just doesn't fit their needs. Could see it worked into a Georgiyev deal:

    Dermott + 3rd for Georgiyev + CBO on Marc Staal?
    May 21, 2020 at 5:01 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 5,062
    Likes: 2,008
    Quoting: firezfurx
    Toronto says no. No reason to trade our 23 yr old 2D unless it is involved in a deal that brings back something better.

    We could go Dermott + 3rd for Georgiyev though?


    You wanted something better then ask for Georgiev???
    May 21, 2020 at 5:03 p.m.
    #5
    Dubas isnt a genius
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 2,824
    Likes: 681
    Quoting: Riley816
    You wanted something better then ask for Georgiev???


    He fits our needs. We won't be able to sign Anderson next offseason and Geo has been super solid so far. Also still young and can be resigned for sub 3m
    May 21, 2020 at 5:06 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Still a Leafs Fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 5,548
    Likes: 661
    Quoting: firezfurx
    Toronto says no. No reason to trade our 23 yr old 2D unless it is involved in a deal that brings back something better.

    We could go Dermott + 3rd for Georgiyev though?


    arguemnt to be made that the 2nd they are getting is practically a 1st (32overall)
    aedoran liked this.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:09 p.m.
    #7
    Dubas isnt a genius
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 2,824
    Likes: 681
    Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
    arguemnt to be made that the 2nd they are getting is practically a 1st (32overall)


    Yes, but would still rather take Georgiyev

    Would you make the Dermott + 3rd deal?
    May 21, 2020 at 5:12 p.m.
    #8
    Breadman likes Bread
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 3,492
    Likes: 1,729
    I’d give a 3rd and a C prospect for Dermott at most. Guy hasn’t proved much to me. I think he’s a top 4 guy at most.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:14 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Quoting: KingLundqvist30
    I’d give a 3rd and a C prospect for Dermott at most. Guy hasn’t proved much to me. I think he’s a top 4 guy at most.


    Yeah 3rd + Howden or Hajek makes sense.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:14 p.m.
    #10
    Breadman likes Bread
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 3,492
    Likes: 1,729
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    Yeah 3rd + Howden or Hajek makes sense.


    I know people are high on him. Just my opinion.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:15 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 21,633
    Likes: 11,992
    Detroit passes. One of Detroit's best prospects, The first pick of the 2nd round in this years draft and another 2nd. That's quite a bit more than Detroit could give up.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:32 p.m.
    #12
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: firezfurx
    Toronto says no. No reason to trade our 23 yr old 2D unless it is involved in a deal that brings back something better.

    We could go Dermott + 3rd for Georgiyev though?


    Georgiev isn't needed. Campbell is better and could be the stop gap between one of Woll or Scott eventually taking over. Dermott is way more usefull than a backup who's career GAA is 3+ and his SV% is .910
    May 21, 2020 at 5:33 p.m.
    #13
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    Georgiev trade looks right. Don't think a pick gets added to Puljujarvi and that's too much for Dermott.

    Also, your Strome contract is ooof. As is Howden at 3C and your UFA targets.

    So basically you get points for the Georgiev trade and everything else you've done is pretty rough.


    Do Rangers fans actually believe that their backup is worth that much? He doesn't really have the stats to backup this value.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:34 p.m.
    #14
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: firezfurx
    He fits our needs. We won't be able to sign Anderson next offseason and Geo has been super solid so far. Also still young and can be resigned for sub 3m


    You don't know that. Andersen may be willing to go shorter term, its going to be a weird goalie market in the near future and going big long term with 30+ year old goalies isn't wise. Just look at Montreal and Florida.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:47 p.m.
    #15
    Dubas isnt a genius
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 2,824
    Likes: 681
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    You don't know that. Andersen may be willing to go shorter term, its going to be a weird goalie market in the near future and going big long term with 30+ year old goalies isn't wise. Just look at Montreal and Florida.


    The problem is even if he extends his current deal, say 5m x 4 yrs it still will age poorly. There are so many great examples of goalies peaking as they get into their UFA's years, then falling off a cliff. George is 24 and Campbell is 27, combined they would cost less then Andy does now, this year both of them posted a higher SV% then Anderson, and they could be good for 5+ yrs for us. Just my thoughts though.
    May 21, 2020 at 5:51 p.m.
    #16
    Dubas isnt a genius
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 2,824
    Likes: 681
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    Georgiev isn't needed. Campbell is better and could be the stop gap between one of Woll or Scott eventually taking over. Dermott is way more usefull than a backup who's career GAA is 3+ and his SV% is .910


    Scott was out the entire year and has yet to play a pro game, while Woll was sub .885 in the AHL. Georgiyev is only 2 years older and was already in the show at their age. I'll be honest I doubt either of them will make it to the NHL.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:03 p.m.
    #17
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: firezfurx
    The problem is even if he extends his current deal, say 5m x 4 yrs it still will age poorly. There are so many great examples of goalies peaking as they get into their UFA's years, then falling off a cliff. George is 24 and Campbell is 27, combined they would cost less then Andy does now, this year both of them posted a higher SV% then Anderson, and they could be good for 5+ yrs for us. Just my thoughts though.


    But George hasn't been good or consistent. His GAA is 3+ over his career, in what way does that scream he's a starter? It doesn't, he just got immense media attention when Dreger said the Rangers were asking for Kapanen plus, it was ridiculous then and is moving forward. Campbell and Andersen are the goalies next season, that's it. The year after will be interesting but with this virus causing so much instability, a 33 year old FA goalie is going to have a hard time justifying a huge contract.
    aedoran liked this.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:08 p.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    Do Rangers fans actually believe that their backup is worth that much? He doesn't really have the stats to backup this value.


    Depends on if you're going by more accurate goalie stats that actually account for shot quality or not. He played behind essentially the worst defense in the league the last 2 seasons, so if you're just going by Sv% or GAA you're not getting the full picture.

    He's 9th among all goalies in the league in Goals Saved Above Expected over the last 2 seasons.

    Only guys in front of him are Halak, Binnington, Hellebuyck, Kuemper, Gibson, Bishop, Khudobin and Lehner.

    Considering he's 2 years younger than the youngest guy on their, cheaper than any of the rest and has more team control than any of the rest, that just increases his value.

    His comps in terms of play relative to age are Andersen, Grubbauer, and Schneider. All of whom got at least 1sts or equivalent value.
    firezfurx liked this.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:09 p.m.
    #19
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: firezfurx
    Scott was out the entire year and has yet to play a pro game, while Woll was sub .885 in the AHL. Georgiyev is only 2 years older and was already in the show at their age. I'll be honest I doubt either of them will make it to the NHL.


    Georgiyev has allowed on average 3 goals a game in the show. That isn't much better than Hutchinson.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:10 p.m.
    #20
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    Depends on if you're going by more accurate goalie stats that actually account for shot quality or not. He played behind essentially the worst defense in the league the last 2 seasons, so if you're just going by Sv% or GAA you're not getting the full picture.

    He's 9th among all goalies in the league in Goals Saved Above Expected over the last 2 seasons.

    Only guys in front of him are Halak, Binnington, Hellebuyck, Kuemper, Gibson, Bishop, Khudobin and Lehner.

    Considering he's 2 years younger than the youngest guy on their, cheaper than any of the rest and has more team control than any of the rest, that just increases his value.

    His comps in terms of play relative to age are Andersen, Grubbauer, and Schneider. All of whom got at least 1sts or equivalent value.


    You can keep him then. I have no interest in paying a premium price for a backup with his poor stats.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:22 p.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    You can keep him then. I have no interest in paying a premium price for a backup with his poor stats.


    lol happy to do so.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:24 p.m.
    #22
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    lol happy to do so.


    It was a pleasure not doing business with you.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:25 p.m.
    #23
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,728
    Likes: 1,559
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    It was a pleasure not doing business with you.


    A pleasure indeed.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:32 p.m.
    #24
    Dubas isnt a genius
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 2,824
    Likes: 681
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    Georgiyev has allowed on average 3 goals a game in the show. That isn't much better than Hutchinson.


    No, but he's a career .915%. You get 3 GAA when you're a bad team that lets a ton of shots on net. Please stop using that statistic it is meaningless. It's about as good of a statistic as Wins.
    May 21, 2020 at 6:36 p.m.
    #25
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 21,633
    Likes: 11,992
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    But George hasn't been good or consistent. His GAA is 3+ over his career, in what way does that scream he's a starter? It doesn't, he just got immense media attention when Dreger said the Rangers were asking for Kapanen plus, it was ridiculous then and is moving forward. Campbell and Andersen are the goalies next season, that's it. The year after will be interesting but with this virus causing so much instability, a 33 year old FA goalie is going to have a hard time justifying a huge contract.


    You are correct in 34 games his GAA was 3.04 but I also don't think that tells the entire story. Expecting to get that much in return for Georgiev isn't very realistic and it not just his stats and play there are other factors. Take a look at the goalies in this years UFA class there are several really good goalies there. The Rangers aren't the only team trying to move a young goalie. Pittsburgh could move Jarry or Murray both are only 25 and I've seen both of them in a lot of proposals done by Pittsburgh fans. Then there is Vancouver who has been Demko is in a lot of proposals done by Vancouver fans. There will be a lot of options for teams looking for a goalie.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll