SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hard moves

Created by: TheChief
Team: 2020-21 Dallas Stars
Initial Creation Date: May 23, 2020
Published: May 23, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,000,000
3$3,333,333
3$2,750,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
3$2,650,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent ($1,200,000 retained)
2.
3.
DAL
  1. Strome, Ryan [RFA Rights]
NYR
  1. Faksa, Radek [RFA Rights]
  2. Oleksiak, Jamie
  3. 2021 4th round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Someone posted a trade like this, don't recall who it was but credit to them.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the BUF
2021
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
2022
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$77,923,564$3,047,866$3,437,500$3,576,436
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,850,000$9,850,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,500,000$9,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,333,333$3,333,333
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 3
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,080,000$4,080,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$4,916,667$4,916,667
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,350,000$2,350,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$737,500$737,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 23, 2020 at 10:38 a.m.
#1
G O S I M E K
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 930
Likes: 368
SJ declines. Burns has way more value than Pavs now and we don’t want Cogliano. With salary retained we could get a better deal for Burns elsewhere.
May 23, 2020 at 10:39 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 881
Likes: 262
Quoting: Lord_Simek
SJ declines. Burns has way more value than Pavs now and we don’t want Cogliano. With salary retained we could get a better deal for Burns elsewhere.


2 years of decent Pavelski ws 5 years of declining Burns...if I were SJ I'd do this quickly.
May 23, 2020 at 10:41 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 2,920
Likes: 1,491
Question is why trade Faksa+ for a guy to be paid 5M on the 3rd line?
May 23, 2020 at 10:42 a.m.
#4
G O S I M E K
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 930
Likes: 368
Quoting: TheChief
2 years of decent Pavelski ws 5 years of declining Burns...if I were SJ I'd do this quickly.


Declining Burns is still good for 55-60 points from the blue line. He’s still putting up big minutes and he really hasn’t shown any sign of declining. He is aging very well as he is very fit.
May 23, 2020 at 10:43 a.m.
#5
Dubas isnt a genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 681
Toronto declines. We take out Liljegren and you take out Comeau and we accept. If that's not enough take SDA. He's worth like a 2nd. And Bracco if you want I know everyone laughs at him but he is 1 year removed from a over a ppg season in the A. Worth a 4th/5th.
May 23, 2020 at 10:43 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,585
Likes: 14,387
Quoting: Lord_Simek
SJ declines. Burns has way more value than Pavs now and we don’t want Cogliano. With salary retained we could get a better deal for Burns elsewhere.


Getting out of burns contract should be a priority
May 23, 2020 at 10:45 a.m.
#7
G O S I M E K
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 930
Likes: 368
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Getting out of burns contract should be a priority


Getting out of Jones and Vlasic deals is a priority. No need to move someone like Burns who isn’t really declining and still holds strong value.
May 23, 2020 at 10:58 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Burns is not a dump. You would need to add your very best prospect probably
May 23, 2020 at 1:50 p.m.
#9
McFaksaGOAT
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 856
Quoting: firezfurx
Toronto declines. We take out Liljegren and you take out Comeau and we accept. If that's not enough take SDA. He's worth like a 2nd. And Bracco if you want I know everyone laughs at him but he is 1 year removed from a over a ppg season in the A. Worth a 4th/5th.


Bruh lmao Dallas doesn’t take that current offer. They’re not moving Klingberg for Nylander, it would be for Marner/Tavares and yeah Dallas would add a little bit but they’d only move Klingberg for a big piece
May 23, 2020 at 2:09 p.m.
#10
Dubas isnt a genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 681
Quoting: McFaksaGOAT
Bruh lmao Dallas doesn’t take that current offer. They’re not moving Klingberg for Nylander, it would be for Marner/Tavares and yeah Dallas would add a little bit but they’d only move Klingberg for a big piece


That's funny. As is Nylander has slightly more value then Klingberg. Nylander+3rd= Klingerg+Robertson.

Nylander is a big piece, 37 goal pace 70 pt pace playing on the 2nd line.

He would've been your top goal scorer by 11 GOALS and your highest point producer by 9 points. He performed considerably better then Seguin, Benn, etc. People forget how good he is.
May 23, 2020 at 4:09 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 881
Likes: 262
Quoting: Bluetomorrow83
Question is why trade Faksa+ for a guy to be paid 5M on the 3rd line?


He plays there since he fits there best. He could play up if there's injuries.
May 23, 2020 at 4:14 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 881
Likes: 262
Quoting: firezfurx
Toronto declines. We take out Liljegren and you take out Comeau and we accept. If that's not enough take SDA. He's worth like a 2nd. And Bracco if you want I know everyone laughs at him but he is 1 year removed from a over a ppg season in the A. Worth a 4th/5th.


Quoting: firezfurx
That's funny. As is Nylander has slightly more value then Klingberg. Nylander+3rd= Klingerg+Robertson.

Nylander is a big piece, 37 goal pace 70 pt pace playing on the 2nd line.

He would've been your top goal scorer by 11 GOALS and your highest point producer by 9 points. He performed considerably better then Seguin, Benn, etc. People forget how good he is.


Nylander and Klingberg are equal in my opinion. Dropping Liljegren and Comeau is absolutely ridiculous idea considering how good Robertson is.

Klingberg+Robertson = Nylander+3rd is the stupidest thing I've heard for a while now.

DAL is low scoring team so it's not exactly a surprise that Nylander would outscore players from the team. Tyler f***ing Ennis would be the 2nd highest scorer behind Seguin in this team.
McFaksaGOAT and C_M_O_R liked this.
May 23, 2020 at 4:15 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 881
Likes: 262
Quoting: papishark
Burns is not a dump. You would need to add your very best prospect probably


Lmaoooo
May 23, 2020 at 4:16 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 881
Likes: 262
Quoting: Lord_Simek
Getting out of Jones and Vlasic deals is a priority. No need to move someone like Burns who isn’t really declining and still holds strong value.


No one is taking them. Better sell of a player with somewhat positive value before your team slumps completely. There's no saving SJ anymore.
May 23, 2020 at 4:16 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 881
Likes: 262
Quoting: McFaksaGOAT
Bruh lmao Dallas doesn’t take that current offer. They’re not moving Klingberg for Nylander, it would be for Marner/Tavares and yeah Dallas would add a little bit but they’d only move Klingberg for a big piece


Tone down a bit. Klingberg ain't that good.
May 23, 2020 at 4:30 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: TheChief
Lmaoooo


If you want us to take two mad overpaid guys back yes. Or you can make a resonable offer
May 23, 2020 at 4:36 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 881
Likes: 262
Quoting: papishark
If you want us to take two mad overpaid guys back yes. Or you can make a resonable offer


Tad overpaid but much shorter contracts.

Might as well leave you with one more crippling contract.
May 23, 2020 at 4:43 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: TheChief
Tad overpaid but much shorter contracts.

Might as well leave you with one more crippling contract.


Ok sounds good. You clearly dont know Burns at all
May 23, 2020 at 9:28 p.m.
#19
McFaksaGOAT
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 856
Quoting: firezfurx
That's funny. As is Nylander has slightly more value then Klingberg. Nylander+3rd= Klingerg+Robertson.

Nylander is a big piece, 37 goal pace 70 pt pace playing on the 2nd line.

He would've been your top goal scorer by 11 GOALS and your highest point producer by 9 points. He performed considerably better then Seguin, Benn, etc. People forget how good he is.


My dude Nylander does not have more value 😭 Klingberg is a legit number 1 offensive dman. One down year in a garbage system doesn’t make him bad
C_M_O_R liked this.
May 23, 2020 at 9:28 p.m.
#20
McFaksaGOAT
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 856
Quoting: TheChief
Tone down a bit. Klingberg ain't that good.


And why’s that? He’s a legit number one offensive dman. Because he had one down year in a system that relies 0 on offense makes him bad? Don’t give me that crap man that’s a load of bs and you know it
May 24, 2020 at 4:36 a.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 881
Likes: 262
Quoting: McFaksaGOAT
And why’s that? He’s a legit number one offensive dman. Because he had one down year in a system that relies 0 on offense makes him bad? Don’t give me that crap man that’s a load of bs and you know it


He has two years left. He's defensively miserable and need to count in Lindell way too much to be called a legit no. 1 D. First pair D sure, but not a leading D necessarily.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll