SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Gaudreau Edit

Created by: reelkena
Published: May 23, 2020 at 7:30 p.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 2/186 (1%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Calgary FlamesCalgary Flames

Trade occurred while using LTIR
LTIR Relief: $894,166
LTIR Used Prior to Trade: -$802,917
OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Gaudreau, JohnnyCalgary FlamesNHL-$6,750,000111---70184058--
Jankowski, MarkCalgary FlamesNHL-$1,675,000111---56527--
Yelesin, AlexanderWaivers ExemptCalgary FlamesMinor-$0011---4000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Anderson, JoshColumbus Blue JacketsIR-$1,850,000011---26134--
Korpisalo, JoonasColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$1,150,000111-------2.60.911
Murray, RyanColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$4,600,000111---27279--
2020 1st round pick (Logo of the Columbus Blue JacketsCBJ)---100------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,697,0832445623612
Change$825,000000100
Final$2,522,083 (↑)2445624 (↑)612-20-320

Logo of the Columbus Blue JacketsColumbus Blue Jackets

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Anderson, JoshColumbus Blue JacketsIR-$19,892011---26134--
Korpisalo, JoonasColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$12,365111-------2.60.911
Murray, RyanColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$49,462111---27279--
2020 1st round pick (Logo of the Columbus Blue JacketsCBJ)---100------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Gaudreau, JohnnyCalgary FlamesNHL-$72,580111---70184058--
Jankowski, MarkCalgary FlamesNHL-$18,010111---56527--
Yelesin, AlexanderWaivers ExemptCalgary FlamesMinor-$0011---4000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,426,7942647613311
Change-$8,871000-100
Final$1,417,923 (↓)2647612 (↓)311203252
May 23, 2020 at 7:33 p.m.
#1
flamesfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Flames still say no
BDIBIT liked this.
May 23, 2020 at 7:35 p.m.
#2
reelkena
Thread Starter
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: flamesfan
Flames still say no


I'll wait for someone with more useful comments to rely on. But even if your correct, if this is a no it shows how far off the last one was.
May 24, 2020 at 1:12 a.m.
#3
Flamedreamer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 281
Likes: 31
This is worse than mine
May 24, 2020 at 1:57 a.m.
#4
reelkena
Thread Starter
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: Flamedreamer
This is worse than mine


Well so far I got two flame biased people with no useful comments so again, I'll wait for someone else.
May 24, 2020 at 2:14 p.m.
#5
ivan092033
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 277
Likes: 72
I feel like this move would not make sense for Calgary because they have Gustafsson and Forbort. Murray is injured way too often and I feel like Calgary is happy with Johnny. (I'm not a Flames fan)
reelkena liked this.
May 24, 2020 at 2:41 p.m.
#6
reelkena
Thread Starter
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Murray is a risk, not gonna argue but all these discussions the last 6 months have been because the talk is that CGY is not happy with Gaudreau and they also think he's gonna leave in 2 years and lose trade value in 1. Gustafsson and Forbort are both UFA's so they can not be confirmed for next season.
May 24, 2020 at 2:42 p.m.
#7
reelkena
Thread Starter
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Appreciate the real comment though.
May 24, 2020 at 6:19 p.m.
#8
NoDeke
WingusAmingus
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 990
Likes: 221
Edited May 24, 2020 at 6:28 p.m.
Dude Johnny Hockey is pristine! You gotta pay big money no wammy’s. In this case its not bad. But ya really gotta hope Anderson becomes a 50 to 60 point guy. You could trade Rittich for something possibly. Murray is solid if they lose the guys they may, but a risk depends what you want out of him.
I would not accept. I would want Werenski and Korpisalo at least! I would want it to be surrounded by those two. Can you fit Anderson and walk away? Maybe throw a player of more value to CBJ with Johnny if that’s the case. Have to be a decent d prospect cuz man. Losing Werenski is big time, on second thought, him and Johnny would have similar value, just at different aspects.
Why are we trying to trading Gaudreau?
May 24, 2020 at 7:10 p.m.
#9
reelkena
Thread Starter
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: NoDeke
Dude Johnny Hockey is pristine! You gotta pay big money no wammy’s. In this case its not bad. But ya really gotta hope Anderson becomes a 50 to 60 point guy. You could trade Rittich for something possibly. Murray is solid if they lose the guys they may, but a risk depends what you want out of him.
I would not accept. I would want Werenski and Korpisalo at least! I would want it to be surrounded by those two. Can you fit Anderson and walk away? Maybe throw a player of more value to CBJ with Johnny if that’s the case. Have to be a decent d prospect cuz man. Losing Werenski is big time, on second thought, him and Johnny would have similar value, just at different aspects.
Why are we trying to trading Gaudreau?


Werenski is not available under any circumstance. It's certainly a package for Johnny type deal and no package would have Zach. As for why are we trading Johnny, I'm not sure but ask CGY the last year.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll