SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How do we make this work - Minnesota fans

Created by: jmac490
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 1, 2020
Published: Jun. 1, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,000,000
2$1,250,000
2$800,000
3$2,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$700,000
Trades
MIN
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$79,763,116$0$400,000$1,736,884
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,625,000$1,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 1, 2020 at 3:31 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 705
Eric Staal as a 3C... seen this show before.
OutCold13 liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 4:24 a.m.
#2
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 1,045
Why though?
Jun. 1, 2020 at 5:45 a.m.
#3
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 3,571
Swap out Johnsson for Liljegren for starters.
TanSor and OutCold13 liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 8:12 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: MNBassman
Swap out Johnsson for Liljegren for starters.


Well that's never happening
Jun. 1, 2020 at 8:30 a.m.
#5
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,061
Quoting: MNBassman
Swap out Johnsson for Liljegren for starters.


They really need a feature on this site that blocks you from publishing an ACGM with trades that have been rejected by one side of the trade's fanbase every single time it's posted.

Johnsson

isn't

needed

by

the

Wild
TanSor, MNBassman and OutCold13 liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 8:51 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Wild don't want any of the Leafs wingers and Kerfoot only makes sense if we strike out on every trade option and Galchenyuk wants out. He'd be a last resort, basically.
JayTea and MNBassman liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 8:58 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,657
Likes: 7,370
Quoting: JayTea
They really need a feature on this site that blocks you from publishing an ACGM with trades that have been rejected by one side of the trade's fanbase every single time it's posted.

Johnsson

isn't

needed

by

the

Wild


i mean, it's not needed by the leafs either. this trade doesnt do anything to shore up their weaknesses
MNBassman and OutCold13 liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 9:49 a.m.
#8
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,061
Quoting: TanSor
Wild don't want any of the Leafs wingers and Kerfoot only makes sense if we strike out on every trade option and Galchenyuk wants out. He'd be a last resort, basically.


And giving up Staal to get him is counter-productive.
TanSor, MNBassman and OutCold13 liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 10:12 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
i mean, it's not needed by the leafs either. this trade doesnt do anything to shore up their weaknesses


The reality is there isn't a trade to be made between the Wild and Leafs unless the Leafs are willing to move Nylander, Tavares, or Matthews and news flash they aren't.
MNBassman liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 11:54 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,657
Likes: 7,370
Quoting: TanSor
The reality is there isn't a trade to be made between the Wild and Leafs unless the Leafs are willing to move Nylander, Tavares, or Matthews and news flash they aren't.


and the wild have literally nothing the Leafs would remotely consider trading those guys for outside of Spurgeon, and that's only Nylander
TanSor and MNBassman liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 11:56 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
and the wild have literally nothing the Leafs would remotely consider trading those guys for outside of Spurgeon, and that's only Nylander


Exactly
Jun. 1, 2020 at 12:22 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,743
Likes: 1,922
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Why though?


I'm a big fan of Staal. He brings veteran experience like Spezza, can be a good role model in the room for Matthews/Marner/Nylander/Kappy, is a better center than Kerfoot, he is from Thunder Bay, so it may be easier for his family to watch games through flying domestic, rather than flying internationally/driving across the border
Jun. 1, 2020 at 12:28 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,743
Likes: 1,922
Quoting: MNBassman
Swap out Johnsson for Liljegren for starters.


I'd consider Staal + pick for Johnsson + Liljegren

Doesn't net you the center in return, but gives you a player that can put up 35-45 points and a solid defensive prospect
Jun. 1, 2020 at 12:34 p.m.
#14
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 1,045
Quoting: jmac490
I'm a big fan of Staal. He brings veteran experience like Spezza, can be a good role model in the room for Matthews/Marner/Nylander/Kappy, is a better center than Kerfoot, he is from Thunder Bay, so it may be easier for his family to watch games through flying domestic, rather than flying internationally/driving across the border


Teams are making trades so its easier for a family to watch, this trade is bad for both teams. Maybe Leafs look at Staal when hes a UFA next offseason but theres no trade to be made here
Jun. 1, 2020 at 12:35 p.m.
#15
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 1,045
Quoting: jmac490
I'd consider Staal + pick for Johnsson + Liljegren

Doesn't net you the center in return, but gives you a player that can put up 35-45 points and a solid defensive prospect


Why trade Liljegren for a rental 3C when we already have a solid 3C and need RD?
Jun. 1, 2020 at 1:17 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,743
Likes: 1,922
Quoting: Terry_AkiSauce
Why trade Liljegren for a rental 3C when we already have a solid 3C and need RD?


Thinking that Staal would like Toronto, then take a deal reminiscent of Spezza to stay. Maybe something between league min and 2M, giving Toronto more options to fill needs next season. Leafs need to shed 3M (which I think will be Mango), and the Leafs have a logjam on defense (as weird as that sounds). Liljegren will probably spend another year or two in the AHL, while Sandin/Muzz/Dermott/Rielly take up the majority of the minutes in the NHL.
He did have a decent year in the AHL last season, so he could be worth hanging onto, but I've always been a massive fan of Eric Staal. So you can call it a bit of bias/stupidity. Whatever you think works
Jun. 1, 2020 at 2:48 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: JayTea
They really need a feature on this site that blocks you from publishing an ACGM with trades that have been rejected by one side of the trade's fanbase every single time it's posted.

Johnsson

isn't

needed

by

the

Wild

Johnsson isn’t needed by anyone. He’s always the throw in TOR fans think will get them the better package
MNBassman liked this.
Jun. 1, 2020 at 3:28 p.m.
#18
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,061
Quoting: KINGS67
Johnsson isn’t needed by anyone. He’s always the throw in TOR fans think will get them the better package


I'm sure there's a team that could use a middle 6 left wing, the Wild just isn't one of them.
MNBassman and OutCold13 liked this.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:42 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: JayTea
I'm sure there's a team that could use a middle 6 left wing, the Wild just isn't one of them.

Yeah I’m pretty sure a team will jump on a guy that had one good year and then Tearing his ACL this year.

I’m sure teams will be clawing and scratching for him even though no team has any idea if his knee will ever be the same again.
Oh not to mention they would love to pay him 4 million as well. 🤦🏼‍♀️
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:45 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,743
Likes: 1,922
Quoting: KINGS67
Yeah I’m pretty sure a team will jump on a guy that had one good year and then Tearing his ACL this year.

I’m sure teams will be clawing and scratching for him even though no team has any idea if his knee will ever be the same again.
Oh not to mention they would love to pay him 4 million as well. 🤦🏼‍♀️


He was on pace for 40 points as well this year before he shredded his knee. It's also closer to 3M than 4M. It's not unreasonable price point for a 40 point player
Jun. 2, 2020 at 1:14 p.m.
#21
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 2,489
I think Wild would consider a swap of one of the many LWs they have for Kapanen, I also think Wild would consider trading for Kerfoot as long as it doesn't involve moving Staal, our lack of center depth being the problem that it is.
These are the other pieces that would interest the Wild.
Mathews
Marner
Nylander
Liljegren
Sandin
I'm sure many of these pieces aren't for sale at a reasonable price, but if you can figure out a way to make a trade with Minnesota that involves some of these pieces that makes sense for both teams then you have something

Keep in mind Wild GM Guerin says he is doing a retool not a rebuild, which usually means the GM is looking for younger talent not big contracts, maybe not established players yet but definitely NHL ready.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 1:19 p.m.
#22
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 2,489
Quoting: TanSor
Wild don't want any of the Leafs wingers and Kerfoot only makes sense if we strike out on every trade option and Galchenyuk wants out. He'd be a last resort, basically.


I actually like Kerfoot better at center than Chucky.
Also if Wild could swap out a lefty for a righty something like Greenway and a bit more for Kapanen then I'd be all for that as well.
This trade though is a no go.
TanSor liked this.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 1:23 p.m.
#23
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 2,489
Quoting: KINGS67
Johnsson isn’t needed by anyone. He’s always the throw in TOR fans think will get them the better package


Maybe the Sharks, seems like a good fit to me, might be a bit expensive for them though.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 1:31 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: Paul13
I actually like Kerfoot better at center than Chucky.
Also if Wild could swap out a lefty for a righty something like Greenway and a bit more for Kapanen then I'd be all for that as well.
This trade though is a no go.


I like Kerfoot the player more than Galchenyuk the player, but I like Galchenyuk and keeping the picks/players it would take to acquire Kerfoot over Kerfoot. I do like Kapanen a lot though
OutCold13 and MNBassman liked this.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:54 a.m.
#25
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 3,571
Oh the trades the Wild coulda made had they not signed Spurgeon to an absurd contract...
TanSor and jmac490 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll