SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Rakell for Lehkonen

Created by: tegith
Published: Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:40 a.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 41/186 (22%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Anaheim DucksAnaheim Ducks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Rakell, RickardAnaheim DucksNHL-$835,307111---65152742--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Lehkonen, ArtturiMontreal CanadiensNHL50%$264,516111---70131427--
Hillis, CameronWaivers ExemptMontreal CanadiensMinor-$0011---0000--
2020 2nd round pick (Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksCHI)---010------
2020 3rd round pick (Logo of the Montreal CanadiensMTL)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$2,151,7102148634611
Change$570,791011020
Final$2,722,501 (↑)2149 (↑)64 (↑)48 (↑)11-2-130

Logo of the Montreal CanadiensMontreal Canadiens

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Lehkonen, ArtturiMontreal CanadiensNHL50%$264,516111---70131427--
Hillis, CameronWaivers ExemptMontreal CanadiensMinor-$0011---0000--
2020 2nd round pick (Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksCHI)---010------
2020 3rd round pick (Logo of the Montreal CanadiensMTL)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Rakell, RickardAnaheim DucksNHL-$835,307111---65152742--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$6,181,19121456131019
Change-$570,7910-1-10-20
Final$5,610,400 (↓)2144 (↓)60 (↓)38 (↓)1921315
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:59 a.m.
#1
PrincessChloe
May contain nuts
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 6,612
Likes: 2,016
Rakell is a solid player on an even better contract. I think MTL takes that and runs.
KeepUps15, BDIBIT and HabsForEver liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:20 a.m.
#2
Nighthawk
2018 Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 747
What is the motivation here for the Ducks?
KeepUps15, Salzy and BDIBIT liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:23 a.m.
#3
KeepUps15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,422
Likes: 1,457
LOL Easy no from ducks. Rakell is gonna be traded for a top 4 RH defenseman. Not scraps
Salzy, zk97 and HabsForEver liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:42 a.m.
#4
Salzy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,139
Likes: 5,943
Unless its Lehko, Brook and the 2020 first this is the easiest pass of Bob Murrays life

Quoting: EmpressKayla
Rakell is a solid player on an even better contract. I think MTL takes that and runs.


This would never even be considered by ANA
PrincessChloe liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 1:18 p.m.
#5
reelkena
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
I was gonna 100% agree with the people above. Then I looked into both prospects. What Ana is looking for as far as base roster goes is not this package, but Ana is hard into a rebuild and they're not fixing this in one year. I like both the prospects numbers, a 2 and a 3 aren't garbage picks and Rakell is only on two years left. He's probably going to get deadlined for a pile like this anyway at some point. What Ana wants for Rakell doesn't really exist. Maybe Dumba but I think other teams can offer more than Rakell for Dumba. If Ana shops around and doesn't see the D they're looking for this is a very strong fall back. Maybe they finagle the 3 into another 2 but that's semantics but I'm gonna go crazy here and say deal from both sides.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:45 p.m.
#6
Kotkaniemi15
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
What on earth?
zk97 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:38 p.m.
#7
AMD81
AMD81
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 28
Likes: 4
I don't see how Anaheim even tries to say anything remotely close to a "yes" on this trade. Lehkonen is a solid player, but Rakell has a brighter future and is a better player. I get the picks and prospects, but a mid-tier prospect, a 2 and a 3? I think ANA would ask for a 1st and a better prospect, plus Lehkonen if ANA wants to move Rakell. And I doubt they even want to do that.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 10:50 p.m.
#8
Nighthawk
2018 Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 747
Quoting: reelkena
I was gonna 100% agree with the people above. Then I looked into both prospects. What Ana is looking for as far as base roster goes is not this package, but Ana is hard into a rebuild and they're not fixing this in one year. I like both the prospects numbers, a 2 and a 3 aren't garbage picks and Rakell is only on two years left. He's probably going to get deadlined for a pile like this anyway at some point. What Ana wants for Rakell doesn't really exist. Maybe Dumba but I think other teams can offer more than Rakell for Dumba. If Ana shops around and doesn't see the D they're looking for this is a very strong fall back. Maybe they finagle the 3 into another 2 but that's semantics but I'm gonna go crazy here and say deal from both sides.


On 2nd & 3rd rounders...
They are good picks to have but a low chance of being NHLers of much significance. Mid 6 to bottom 6 F’s is a realistic hope. Top 4 D maybe or more likely bottom pairing. More picks though can better the chance to find a gem. Overall more likely to be role/depth players.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 11:01 p.m.
#9
LosPatos
LosPatos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 1,846
Ducks say no
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll