SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blockbuster makes leafs crazy good

Created by: MatthewsDynasty
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2020
Published: Jun. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I know philly would be in a cap crunch but it's really just one year in advance because hart will make about 8 mil.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$700,000
1$1,400,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$10,000,000
1$10,000,000
1$700,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. Marner, Mitchell
  2. Tavares, John
  3. 2020 4th round pick (VGK)
  4. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. 2020 1st round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Anywhere
CAR
  1. Andersen, Frederik
Additional Details:
Comes with extension
3.
TOR
  1. 2020 3rd round pick (ANA)
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Anywhere
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,382,616$0$82,500$117,384
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$10,000,000$10,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,333,333$4,333,333
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$730,833$730,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:09 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
too much for hall, rather keep marner and pay the better player 900k more
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:09 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 192
Quoting: vr1995
too much for hall, rather keep marner and pay the better player 900k more


It's because it's only for 1 year
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:10 p.m.
#3
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,844
Likes: 8,548
Tavares won't waive
MatthewsDynasty liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:14 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 1,985
OMG! That Philly deal is atrocious!

Taveres clearly and massivley upgrades Couturier. Marner for Hart??? Think ya just might get more there too. Meaning Niskanen for a pair of picks + differences? Nope.

And the crazy part is, you are gonna move all that so that the Leafs get a good young tender who is gonna sign for Freddie money anyway?

Hart is the only benefit the Leafs get out of this, and the price tag isn't close to worth it.

On the Philly side, hey massivley upgrade centre and RW, for Couturier (he is good), and what would be a contract dump given the depth of the Philly blueline system. Then what is after Hart? NOTHING! The deal creates a problem in Philly that took them 30 years to solve!!!! No. No. No. No. You aren't going to sell me on how good Marner and Tavares are. 30 years!!!!! Best tender the Flyers have had since effin' Hextall! Fletcher would be fired for picking up the phone, nevermind actually making the deal.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:14 p.m.
#5
Canes Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 1,250
If we could get Freddy signed for say a 3 year deal I wouldnt be apposed to getting him. But thats probably unrealistic, he will be looking for longer.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
#6
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
Philly decline.
Pmwalker and Jahy2865 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:22 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Carolina isn't giving up a 1st for a Goaltender that's heading for the wrong side of 30, When they can sign Lehner for free.
TWOminutes4surging liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:23 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Fat chance of either Hall or Pietrangelo take one year deals, Both will get their money and term elsewhere.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:33 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,118
Likes: 4,975
Quoting: jslongo
If we could get Freddy signed for say a 3 year deal I wouldnt be apposed to getting him. But thats probably unrealistic, he will be looking for longer.


He won't sign for us anyway. We've been to this well before.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 3:55 p.m.
#10
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,185
Likes: 20,724
Quoting: jslongo
If we could get Freddy signed for say a 3 year deal I wouldnt be apposed to getting him. But thats probably unrealistic, he will be looking for longer.


I dont see many teams signing him longer than 3 years. He will be 33 at the end of his contract. Thats old for a goaltender and with the possibility of his play faltering as he ages I have a feeling Dubas will target someone else.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 4:02 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: swinny
OMG! That Philly deal is atrocious!

Taveres clearly and massivley upgrades Couturier. Marner for Hart??? Think ya just might get more there too. Meaning Niskanen for a pair of picks + differences? Nope.

And the crazy part is, you are gonna move all that so that the Leafs get a good young tender who is gonna sign for Freddie money anyway?

Hart is the only benefit the Leafs get out of this, and the price tag isn't close to worth it.

On the Philly side, hey massivley upgrade centre and RW, for Couturier (he is good), and what would be a contract dump given the depth of the Philly blueline system. Then what is after Hart? NOTHING! The deal creates a problem in Philly that took them 30 years to solve!!!! No. No. No. No. You aren't going to sell me on how good Marner and Tavares are. 30 years!!!!! Best tender the Flyers have had since effin' Hextall! Fletcher would be fired for picking up the phone, nevermind actually making the deal.


They had Bobrovsky and in his hey day in CBJ was probably better than Hart - but I get your point
Jun. 12, 2020 at 5:51 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 218
Likes: 113
I don't know if this is a troll post or not, but you're taking three untouchable players from Philly.

Couturier is more valuable than Tavares.

We don't need or want Marner.

Niskanen is our only first pairing defenseman.

You're never getting Hart. Leafs fans need to stop trading for him.

It's not even cap compliant for the Flyers.

Please consider our own needs and surpluses before you throw out an offer.
Pmwalker and Jahy2865 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 6:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 1,985
Quoting: Boomer125
They had Bobrovsky and in his hey day in CBJ was probably better than Hart - but I get your point


So does anyone think they are making that mistake again?

Hextall. I 100% stand behind that.
Pmwalker liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 6:15 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 1,985
Quoting: Couturier
I don't know if this is a troll post or not, but you're taking three untouchable players from Philly.

Couturier is more valuable than Tavares.

We don't need or want Marner.

Niskanen is our only first pairing defenseman.

You're never getting Hart. Leafs fans need to stop trading for him.

It's not even cap compliant for the Flyers.

Please consider our own needs and surpluses before you throw out an offer.


Leafs fan here..... and I just trashed it for you.

Read my comments. You will enjoy them lol

"On the Philly side, hey massivley upgrade centre and RW, for Couturier (he is good), and what would be a contract dump given the depth of the Philly blueline system. Then what is after Hart? NOTHING! The deal creates a problem in Philly that took them 30 years to solve!!!! No. No. No. No. You aren't going to sell me on how good Marner and Tavares are. 30 years!!!!! Best tender the Flyers have had since effin' Hextall! Fletcher would be fired for picking up the phone, nevermind actually making the deal."

Great point on the cap compliancy as well. Missed that one.
Pmwalker liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 6:56 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 218
Likes: 113
Quoting: swinny
Leafs fan here..... and I just trashed it for you.

Read my comments. You will enjoy them lol

"On the Philly side, hey massivley upgrade centre and RW, for Couturier (he is good), and what would be a contract dump given the depth of the Philly blueline system. Then what is after Hart? NOTHING! The deal creates a problem in Philly that took them 30 years to solve!!!! No. No. No. No. You aren't going to sell me on how good Marner and Tavares are. 30 years!!!!! Best tender the Flyers have had since effin' Hextall! Fletcher would be fired for picking up the phone, nevermind actually making the deal."

Great point on the cap compliancy as well. Missed that one.


Well, you only covered half of what I covered and the rest contradicts what I said. You said they massively upgrade in center and right wing. Couturier is the better center. You're right that we upgrade in right wing even though we don't need any more right wings. Niskanen isn't a cap dump. You're right when you said Hart is the piece that the Flyers have been looking for.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 7:14 p.m.
#16
Pmwalker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 944
Likes: 302
I stopped reading at Tavares is a massive upgrade on Coots. Some folk need to watch other teams play more often.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 7:17 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 1,985
Quoting: Couturier
Well, you only covered half of what I covered and the rest contradicts what I said. You said they massively upgrade in center and right wing. Couturier is the better center. You're right that we upgrade in right wing even though we don't need any more right wings. Niskanen isn't a cap dump. You're right when you said Hart is the piece that the Flyers have been looking for.


Courturier better than Tavares? That's a big strech lmao!

He is good. Really good. But no, he is not the better centre lol. That's an argument I need to hear lol.

I didn't say Niskanen is a cap dump, he would look like it in that deal. Given the depth of Philly's RD, I would argue he could be moved. Would I? Probably not. But the depth is there to do it.

Hart is just off limits.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 7:42 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 218
Likes: 113
Quoting: swinny
Courturier better than Tavares? That's a big strech lmao!

He is good. Really good. But no, he is not the better centre lol. That's an argument I need to hear lol.

I didn't say Niskanen is a cap dump, he would look like it in that deal. Given the depth of Philly's RD, I would argue he could be moved. Would I? Probably not. But the depth is there to do it.

Hart is just off limits.


As of right now? Couturier is better. In the past? Tavares was better.

I get that Couturier was on pace for 70 points this year and Tavares was on pace for 78. However, Tavares gets to play with elite talent on his powerplay unit. The powerplay of the Flyers doesn't have the same talent. The more important factor should be Couturier's defensive play. He should be a finalist for the Selke award this year. That outweighs having lower production than Tavares. That should should settle the argument.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:01 p.m.
#19
Pmwalker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 944
Likes: 302
Quoting: swinny
Courturier better than Tavares? That's a big strech lmao!

He is good. Really good. But no, he is not the better centre lol. That's an argument I need to hear lol.

I didn't say Niskanen is a cap dump, he would look like it in that deal. Given the depth of Philly's RD, I would argue he could be moved. Would I? Probably not. But the depth is there to do it.

Hart is just off limits.


Phillys RD depth

Niskanen (a year left)
Braun (Pending UFA)
Myers
Friedman

Niskanen played top pair minutes with Provorov. Exactly how does our RD depth make him look like a cap dump??????
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:26 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 1,985
Quoting: Pmwalker
Phillys RD depth

Niskanen (a year left)
Braun (Pending UFA)
Myers
Friedman

Niskanen played top pair minutes with Provorov. Exactly how does our RD depth make him look like a cap dump??????


Oh, your one of those people that like because someone is a left shot they can't play the right side.

Sanhiem.... who at this stage is more than capable.

Which means, Sanhiem, Braun and Myers. And for 21-22, I suspect Myers is ready for top 4.

In the deal as it was proposed, yes, Niskanen is a cap dump. Plain and simple. 21 million coming in, someone is going out.

I never said it was a good trade. I never said I wiuld move him. But I will say, again, in that deal, he is.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:30 p.m.
#21
Pmwalker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 944
Likes: 302
Quoting: swinny
Oh, your one of those people that like because someone is a left shot they can't play the right side.

Sanhiem.... who at this stage is more than capable.

Which means, Sanhiem, Braun and Myers. And for 21-22, I suspect Myers is ready for top 4.

In the deal as it was proposed, yes, Niskanen is a cap dump. Plain and simple. 21 million coming in, someone is going out.

I never said it was a good trade. I never said I wiuld move him. But I will say, again, in that deal, he is.


Is this the point where you PRETEND to know more about the team than I do? Or does that come later?
You’ve already proven pretty clueless about our current defensive makeup. Niskanen a cap dump......ok sure.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:52 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 1,985
Quoting: Pmwalker
Is this the point where you PRETEND to know more about the team than I do? Or does that come later?
You’ve already proven pretty clueless about our current defensive makeup. Niskanen a cap dump......ok sure.


I'll say it again. In the construct of that deal, yes he is. Otherwise it's Myers. That would be 100% the preference from a Leafs point of view. No need for a 33 year old defenseman. So short of the Flyers needing to move cap in the deal as presented, cap dump. What do you call the Niskanen for Gudas deal if your were Washington a couple years ago? An upgrade?

Not so clueless to know Sanhiem can play RD. That is a significant ommission on your part. May not be where you want him, but he plays it, and plays it exceedingly well. And that's not likely to change any time soon with Morin coming in the left side.

Not so clueless to say Couturier is a better centreman than Tavares either. Here's the difference: Tavares can carry his own line. He played with questionable wingers in Long Island and put up numbers. Those teams sucked. Couturier didn't put anything close to Taveres numbers up until he started playing with Giroux on a regular basis. Before that, he was a solid 2C.

But, hey.... what do I know?🤷‍♂️
Jun. 13, 2020 at 12:15 a.m.
#23
Pmwalker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 944
Likes: 302
Quoting: swinny
I'll say it again. In the construct of that deal, yes he is. Otherwise it's Myers. That would be 100% the preference from a Leafs point of view. No need for a 33 year old defenseman. So short of the Flyers needing to move cap in the deal as presented, cap dump. What do you call the Niskanen for Gudas deal if your were Washington a couple years ago? An upgrade?

Not so clueless to know Sanhiem can play RD. That is a significant ommission on your part. May not be where you want him, but he plays it, and plays it exceedingly well. And that's not likely to change any time soon with Morin coming in the left side.

Not so clueless to say Couturier is a better centreman than Tavares either. Here's the difference: Tavares can carry his own line. He played with questionable wingers in Long Island and put up numbers. Those teams sucked. Couturier didn't put anything close to Taveres numbers up until he started playing with Giroux on a regular basis. Before that, he was a solid 2C.

But, hey.... what do I know?🤷‍♂️


All you’ve done is proven you’re pretty clueless about teams other than the Leafs. ✌️
Jun. 13, 2020 at 1:14 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,735
Likes: 1,985
Quoting: Pmwalker
All you’ve done is proven you’re pretty clueless about teams other than the Leafs. ✌️


🙄
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll