SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trading Freddy for a First and Kapanen for Manson

Created by: OldNYIfan
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2020
Published: Jun. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Today's effort at creative thinking, spurred by several comments I've seen recently that Toronto might not want to re-sign Freddie Andersen to a new contract.

The pre-conditions of the Manson trade are that Anaheim has signed free agent RD Dylan DeMelo and traded for RD MacKenzie Weeger, so don't bother commenting that "Anaheim won't trade their only young RD."

Elements of the Manson/Kapanen trade were suggested by SammyT_51 as an improvement on a similar idea. Isac Lundestrom immediately becomes Toronto's best center prospect.

Minnesota trades down from the 24th overall pick to the 50th overall pick in return for one year of Freddie Andersen, a good young defenseman for the foreseeable future, and moving up one round in the 2021 draft. Toronto moves into the first round and gets an inexpensive right-handed middle 6 forward to replace some of Kapanen's production.

My thought is that Anton Khudobin behind an improved defense would be almost as good as Andersen, and a lot cheaper.

Note the effect on the draft chart. Toronto currently has one first (2021) and two seconds (one of which might become a third) in the next two drafts. After these moves, Toronto has two firsts and two thirds.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,250,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. 2020 4th round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Hartman, Ryan
  2. 2020 1st round pick (PIT)
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Dermott, Travis [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (TOR)
  4. 2021 2nd round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. 2020 3rd round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Becomes a 2021 3rd round pick if this pick is transferred as a result of the Lucic/Neal trade
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$79,438,116$0$400,000$2,061,884
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$850,000$850,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:45 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Manson > Kapanen
Maybe Manson + Lunderstrom vs Kapanen + Liljegren
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:48 p.m.
#2
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,482
Likes: 6,455
How is Minnesota taking on Andersen when they still need to manage Dubnyk, get Kahkonen some icetime, and keep Stalock on the books?

I mean sure, Stalock could just get traded/waived, but regardless of the choice he's not going to be a part of the Wild organization. Too likely he gets claimed off of waivers. With Dubnyk, you're looking at nearly $3M in dead cap a la buyout or a trade during a time where cap space is more of a commodity than ever. It'd be expensive for the Wild to move him, or there's going to be cap coming back the other way. More curious than anything. Thoughts?
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:48 p.m.
#3
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Khudobin is primarily a product of Dallas' defensive system and wouldnt be repeated if he came to Toronto.
firezfurx liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:50 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: GMs
Manson > Kapanen
Maybe Manson + Lunderstrom vs Kapanen + Liljegren


No, as the Anaheim GM I'm quite happy with that exchange and Toronto wouldn't include Liljegren in that package because they need three decent RD next season; their alternatives aren't nearly as appealing.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:51 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: Jack_
Khudobin is primarily a product of Dallas' defensive system and wouldnt be repeated if he came to Toronto.


I think that's seriously speculative.
zyyyp liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:52 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: OldNYIfan
No, as the Anaheim GM I'm quite happy with that exchange and Toronto wouldn't include Liljegren in that package because they need three decent RD next season; their alternatives aren't nearly as appealing.


Manson = Kapanen ?
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:54 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
How is Minnesota taking on Andersen when they still need to manage Dubnyk, get Kahkonen some icetime, and keep Stalock on the books?

I mean sure, Stalock could just get traded/waived, but regardless of the choice he's not going to be a part of the Wild organization. Too likely he gets claimed off of waivers. With Dubnyk, you're looking at nearly $3M in dead cap a la buyout or a trade during a time where cap space is more of a commodity than ever. It'd be expensive for the Wild to move him, or there's going to be cap coming back the other way. More curious than anything. Thoughts?


The resulting Wild team I've constructed in parallel with this post has a little over $6 million in cap space with the two goalies but only 21 roster slots filled. My initial (i.e., half-baked as yet) idea is that they might carry Stalock for the first half of the season to see whether Dubnyk rights himself. Note that Dubnyk's contract is up next year, too.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:59 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: GMs
Manson = Kapanen ?


My feeling is that with De Melo and Weegar signed long term, plus Gudbranson and Hakanpaa, Manson is surplus to our needs (and signed for only two more seasons). Meanwhile, our current RWs are Jacob Silfverberg, Troy Terry and Carter Rowney, plus some leftie youngster(s) playing on their off side. I think that Kapanen slots in there nicely, plus the Maple Leafs fans keep saying he's a #2 RW, so I'll take the chance that he's good enough for us.
GMs liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:59 p.m.
#9
LosPatos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 1,832
Here we go again...
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:02 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Hmmm, I'll trust Sammy on this one (ik he loves Lundestrom) and I'm gonna have to pass, ik Kap also had a p big down yr, I'd prefer just straight up that first 1 for 1
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:04 p.m.
#11
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,482
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The resulting Wild team I've constructed in parallel with this post has a little over $6 million in cap space with the two goalies but only 21 roster slots filled. My initial (i.e., half-baked as yet) idea is that they might carry Stalock for the first half of the season to see whether Dubnyk rights himself. Note that Dubnyk's contract is up next year, too.


This solution doesn't exactly solve the Kahkonen conundrum. He's done his two years in the AHL and his deal's up. Given the window for goalies, he's only got about 6-8 quality seasons left in him to maximize his earnings: is he taking a deal with term to play in the NHL or is he going to end up going back to Finland for a payday?

We both know that Dubnyk and Stalock aren't the long-term options here. Regardless if Andersen signs elsewhere or becomes another anchor for the Wild, all signs point to Minnesota hedging their bets on the young Finnish goaltender. If the space is there, a buyout for Dubnyk makes sense. If Kahkonen can be signed to a three year deal similar to Saros, then I think half a season in the NHL for both Stalock and Kahkonen could work. I'd personally defer to an Andersen-Kahkonen tandem though: I think Stalock doesn't offer anything to Minnesota except a roster spot to get in Kahkonen's way.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:05 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: AFOX10900
Hmmm, I'll trust Sammy on this one (ik he loves Lundestrom) and I'm gonna have to pass, ik Kap also had a p big down yr, I'd prefer just straight up that first 1 for 1


Not sure I understand your comment. Are you saying you think Andersen = Pitt's first-round pick?
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:06 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
This solution doesn't exactly solve the Kahkonen conundrum. He's done his two years in the AHL and his deal's up. Given the window for goalies, he's only got about 6-8 quality seasons left in him to maximize his earnings: is he taking a deal with term to play in the NHL or is he going to end up going back to Finland for a payday?

We both know that Dubnyk and Stalock aren't the long-term options here. Regardless if Andersen signs elsewhere or becomes another anchor for the Wild, all signs point to Minnesota hedging their bets on the young Finnish goaltender. If the space is there, a buyout for Dubnyk makes sense. If Kahkonen can be signed to a three year deal similar to Saros, then I think half a season in the NHL for both Stalock and Kahkonen could work. I'd personally defer to an Andersen-Kahkonen tandem though: I think Stalock doesn't offer anything to Minnesota except a roster spot to get in Kahkonen's way.


Thanks for the input and the education. I was not sufficiently knowledgeable about the interplay with Kahkonen. All I've done is re-sign him to a minimum contract.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:08 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Not sure I understand your comment. Are you saying you think Andersen = Pitt's first-round pick?


Manson for the first instead of Kap
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:13 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: AFOX10900
Manson for the first instead of Kap


I still don't get it. You mean Manson from Anaheim to Minnesota for the first? Or Toronto should flip him to the Wild instead of sending Andersen? Or Manson to Toronto for their 2021 first? I'm not grasping your idea.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:16 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I still don't get it. You mean Manson from Anaheim to Minnesota for the first? Or Toronto should flip him to the Wild instead of sending Andersen? Or Manson to Toronto for their 2021 first? I'm not grasping your idea.


Toronto flips PITs 2020 1st for Manson
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:21 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: AFOX10900
Toronto flips PITs 2020 1st for Manson


After all of the effort Leafs Nation put into acquiring the guy?

Naaah.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:21 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,721
Likes: 5,224
Seems like quite the contract for 34 year Khudobin, especially when 2 out of his 3 best seasons have coincidentally come these past seasons with a highly defensive Dallas team.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:23 p.m.
#19
Pmwalker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 944
Likes: 302
Too much for Kapanen. The difference in value between Kapanen and Manson isn’t this great.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:24 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: OldNYIfan
After all of the effort Leafs Nation put into acquiring the guy?

Naaah.


Huh...? If we get Demelo (say trade for his UFA rights) and Weegar, everything previously basically goes out the window, and I'd just simply rather have a 2020 1st than Kap
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:25 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
Seems like quite the contract for 34 year Khudobin, especially when 2 out of his 3 best seasons have coincidentally come these past seasons with a highly defensive Dallas team.


That's certainly a valid consideration. However, note that he's only three and a half years older than Freddie.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:27 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: AFOX10900
Huh...? If we get Demelo (say trade for his UFA rights) and Weegar, everything previously basically goes out the window, and I'd just simply rather have a 2020 1st than Kap


Okay, now I get it. The problem is, with Dumba and Spurgeon on the right side, I don't think that the Wild are interested in Manson, especially if it means giving us their second first.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:31 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Okay, now I get it. The problem is, with Dumba and Spurgeon on the right side, I don't think that the Wild are interested in Manson, especially if it means giving us their second first.


They're still getting Freddy for that pick that Toronto is then flipping for Manson
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:31 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,721
Likes: 5,224
Quoting: OldNYIfan
That's certainly a valid consideration. However, note that he's only three and a half years older than Freddie.


Yes, and we're concerned about giving Freddie too much money/term. That just intensifies with Khudobin, given that he's older and we don't know how he'd perform under a much different style than Dallas's.

Quoting: OldNYIfan
Okay, now I get it. The problem is, with Dumba and Spurgeon on the right side, I don't think that the Wild are interested in Manson, especially if it means giving us their second first.


Also, I think he's saying after the Leafs acquire Pitts 1st, they then trade it to the Ducks for Manson.

Edit: Never mind, he got it.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:33 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,039
Quoting: Pmwalker
Too much for Kapanen. The difference in value between Kapanen and Manson isn’t this great.


As noted above, as the Anaheim GM, I'm quite happy with this exchange. Kapanen fits both a short-term and long-term need for us. To me, it seems clear that Kapanen-Silfverberg-Terry-Rowney is superior to Silfverberg-Heinen-Terry-Rowney and DeMelo-Weegar-Manson-Gudbranson isn't a significant improvement on DeMelo-Weegar-Gudbranson-Hakanpaa.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll