SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Maybe trade

Created by: csick
Team: 2020-21 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 13, 2020
Published: Jun. 13, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,750,000
Trades
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
17$81,500,000$65,835,212$1,700,000$3,700,000$15,664,788
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 13, 2020 at 8:36 p.m.
#1
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
avs wouldn't need or want baertschi. if he's there as a cap dump maybe change the pick since i assume timmins is a must for the trade.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 8:41 p.m.
#2
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
If we're trading Timmins + 1st + a good roster player I think we can do better than Boeser, since his injury history is fairly concerning.

For example Rakell, Domi, or Reinhart would be atatinable for around that price.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 8:47 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,789
Likes: 23,875
Quoting: Richard88
If we're trading Timmins + 1st + a good roster player I think we can do better than Boeser, since his injury history is fairly concerning.

For example Rakell, Domi, or Reinhart would be atatinable for around that price.


I think Reinhart and Boeser are the best in that list.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 9:04 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: csick
I think Reinhart and Boeser are the best in that list.

I’d have Boeser 3rd on that list behind Reinhart and Rackell. Boeser’s injury history is a serious concern to any team that would be looking to acquire him enough so that conditions are probably put on any pick trades for him.
Richard88 liked this.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 9:06 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 352
Likes: 56
Vancouver passes IMO. Timmins is a huge question mark and we dont need computer especially at that price.

Byram would be the price for Boeser in my mind.
sedin33 liked this.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 9:11 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
I would pass, just don’t trust Boesera health, too Risky to invest prime assets in him, has yet to show he can Handle a full season without a significant injury
Richard88 liked this.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 9:12 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: bdb
Vancouver passes IMO. Timmins is a huge question mark and we dont need computer especially at that price.

Byram would be the price for Boeser in my mind.


Boeser has health issue question marks as well so you’re not getting one for top prospects in all of hockey for a guy who you can arguably say is injury prone
Richard88 liked this.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 9:23 p.m.
#8
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: bdb
Vancouver passes IMO. Timmins is a huge question mark and we dont need computer especially at that price.

Byram would be the price for Boeser in my mind.


Byram is not getting traded for Boeser.
csick and coga16 liked this.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 9:42 p.m.
#9
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
VAN is not trading Boeser.
sedin33 liked this.
Jun. 13, 2020 at 10:32 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 352
Likes: 56
Quoting: coga16
Boeser has health issue question marks as well so you’re not getting one for top prospects in all of hockey for a guy who you can arguably say is injury prone


Okay, potential is great, lots of prospects have it but few realize it. It's not Byram is a generational talent. He certainly took a step back this year.

Regardless, your not getting one of the top young snipers in the league for that package. He's produced on par with Rantanen so far in his career. More goals and less assists.

Would you move Mikko for Wsh's 1st, Hagelin and Alexyev?
Jun. 13, 2020 at 10:40 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: bdb
Okay, potential is great, lots of prospects have it but few realize it. It's not Byram is a generational talent. He certainly took a step back this year.

Regardless, your not getting one of the top young snipers in the league for that package. He's produced on par with Rantanen so far in his career. More goals and less assists.

Would you move Mikko for Wsh's 1st, Hagelin and Alexyev?


I never said the trade package was good, I said I don’t trust boesers health,

He’s good but he’s not at that level of impact winger, especially for you yo compare a trade of him with mikko. Mikko was putting up 80 point seasons on his elc, boeser hasn’t come close to the production bc he can’t stay healthy

You are talking 2 different caliber of players there so your comparable trade falls short but I know what you are trying to say
Jun. 14, 2020 at 12:11 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 352
Likes: 56
Boeser
Quoting: coga16
I never said the trade package was good, I said I don’t trust boesers health,

He’s good but he’s not at that level of impact winger, especially for you yo compare a trade of him with mikko. Mikko was putting up 80 point seasons on his elc, boeser hasn’t come close to the production bc he can’t stay healthy

You are talking 2 different caliber of players there so your comparable trade falls short but I know what you are trying to say


I thought I was talking to the OP but the production is actually quite close, and it is unfortunate the Boeser has had an injury deal each of his season but they are all unrelated so I don't think the injury prone label fits here.

Mikko also played with MacKinnon and Landeskog and Boeser with Horvat and Baertschi on his ELC.

Goals per game.
Boeser .38
Rantanen .35

Pts per game
Boeser .82
Rantanen .89
Jun. 14, 2020 at 5:18 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 381
Likes: 26
Boeser = compher and 1st. Baer doesn't get ya timmins. and van has to add.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll