SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kill me if you must

Created by: Sonuvabirch69
Team: 2020-21 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 16, 2020
Published: Jun. 16, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
2$1,750,000
1$1,250,000
2$925,000
2$925,000
2$925,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Murray, Matt [RFA Rights]
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
2nd becomes a first if Penguins advance to the second round
2.
3.
PIT
    Not tendered qualifying offer
    ANA
    1. Rodrigues, Evan [RFA Rights]
    4.
    PIT
      Frigged off to Sweden
      ANA
      1. Nyberg, John [RFA Rights]
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2020
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      2021
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the ANA
      2022
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$81,500,000$70,450,175$0$850,000$11,049,825
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $5,500,000$5,500,000
      LW, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $8,700,000$8,700,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      LW, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $9,500,000$9,500,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $2,250,000$2,250,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 2
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      LW, C
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $3,500,000$3,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $750,000$750,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $3,500,000$3,500,000
      LW, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $4,100,000$4,100,000
      LD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $7,250,000$7,250,000
      RD
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $1,750,000$1,750,000
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $4,025,175$4,025,175
      LD
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $1,150,000$1,150,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $700,000$700,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $925,000$925,000
      LD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $925,000$925,000
      RW, C, LW
      UFA - 2

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 8:19 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Pens pass
      Yojimbo liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 8:22 p.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 7,261
      Likes: 2,706
      I'd simply rather pay ERod 2 mil instead of Zemgus... and I like Zemgus
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 8:25 p.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 8,280
      Likes: 4,924
      You can keep bjugstad, and for that remove the condition on the pick. Murray and a 2021 1st for saad is a no brainer for the hawks
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 8:31 p.m.
      #4
      v5 CBJ GM
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2019
      Posts: 15,911
      Likes: 8,565
      🔫🔪🗡⚔
      Sonuvabirch69 liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 8:47 p.m.
      #5
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 9,841
      Likes: 5,808
      That first line would be pretty nasty, but I think the trade could be Tweaked to benefit both teams better.

      Counter Offer

      Pittsburgh Penguins
      Brandon Saad (50%) retained

      Chicago Blackhawks
      Murray
      2021 first round pick (top ten protected)
      2022 2nd round pick conditional on Saad signing an extension?
      Sonuvabirch69 liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:21 p.m.
      #6
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2020
      Posts: 1,249
      Likes: 301
      Quoting: AFOX10900
      I'd simply rather pay ERod 2 mil instead of Zemgus... and I like Zemgus


      E Rod was **** this year
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:26 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 7,261
      Likes: 2,706
      Quoting: ICantHaveFunWithMyUsername
      E Rod was **** this year


      In BUF, yes... he was really good in PIT, and fit very well, and was solid last year
      mhockey91 liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:26 p.m.
      #8
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2020
      Posts: 1,249
      Likes: 301
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      That first line would be pretty nasty, but I think the trade could be Tweaked to benefit both teams better.

      Counter Offer

      Pittsburgh Penguins
      Brandon Saad (50%) retained

      Chicago Blackhawks
      Murray
      2021 first round pick (top ten protected)
      2022 2nd round pick conditional on Saad signing an extension?


      Seems more fitting. Saad comes home to Pittsburgh while Matt Murray goes to Chicago to be a younger starting goaltender over Corey Crawford who most likely will be out of Chicago. This could only happen if Askarov isn’t selected by the Blackhawks in the draft. If not, Murray is still an upgrade over the aging Corey Crawford.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:40 p.m.
      #9
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      That first line would be pretty nasty, but I think the trade could be Tweaked to benefit both teams better.

      Counter Offer

      Pittsburgh Penguins
      Brandon Saad (50%) retained

      Chicago Blackhawks
      Murray
      2021 first round pick (top ten protected)
      2022 2nd round pick conditional on Saad signing an extension?


      Quoting: Wadejos123
      You can keep bjugstad, and for that remove the condition on the pick. Murray and a 2021 1st for saad is a no brainer for the hawks


      Pens get absolutely fleeced. I wouldn’t trade Murray for Saad 1 for 1
      pharrow, Pensfan89 and Yojimbo liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:47 p.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 8,280
      Likes: 4,924
      Quoting: mhockey91
      Pens get absolutely fleeced. I wouldn’t trade Murray for Saad 1 for 1


      lol pens fans are delusional. Barclay Goodrow got a 1st round pick, BlakeColeman got a 1st and a B level prospect. Hartman a few years ago got the hawks a 1st, 5th, and a prospect. Saad is far better than all those guys. Saad has a lot more value than you think
      SociallyHawkward liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:56 p.m.
      #11
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: Wadejos123
      lol pens fans are delusional. Barclay Goodrow got a 1st round pick, BlakeColeman got a 1st and a B level prospect. Hartman a few years ago got the hawks a 1st, 5th, and a prospect. Saad is far better than all those guys. Saad has a lot more value than you think


      Says the hawks fan lol. You’re delusional if you think pens would trade Murray for a guy who gets 40-50 points now. If you knew anything, you’d know that Tampa overpaid for those guys because
      #1- they lacked physicality in the playoffs last year
      #2- they have such a low cap hit
      #3- they’re signed beyond next season
      #4- it was at deadline and teams overpay then

      Saad is a nice piece but we’re not trading our 2X Stanley cup goalie for a UFA forward on a 6 million dollar contract who hasn’t been good since Columbus.
      Yojimbo liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:58 p.m.
      #12
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 19,215
      Likes: 4,837
      Quoting: mhockey91
      Pens get absolutely fleeced. I wouldn’t trade Murray for Saad 1 for 1


      here here!

      This trade is awful
      mhockey91 liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:59 p.m.
      #13
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: pharrow
      here here!

      This trade is awful


      Thank you. I’m sure you agree with my comment above as well
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:59 p.m.
      #14
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 19,215
      Likes: 4,837
      Quoting: mhockey91
      Says the hawks fan lol. You’re delusional if you think pens would trade Murray for a guy who gets 40-50 points now. If you knew anything, you’d know that Tampa overpaid for those guys because
      #1- they lacked physicality in the playoffs last year
      #2- they have such a low cap hit
      #3- they’re signed beyond next season
      #4- it was at deadline and teams overpay then

      Saad is a nice piece but we’re not trading our 2X Stanley cup goalie for a UFA forward on a 6 million dollar contract who hasn’t been good since Columbus.


      for the record, he wasn't good in CBJ either.
      mhockey91 liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:01 p.m.
      #15
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: pharrow
      for the record, he wasn't good in CBJ either.


      31 goals the one year and 50+ points both years. Those are good stats. But Like I said, I’d gladly have saad on pit but not at the expense of Murray.

      Jake-Crosby-Saad
      Zucker-Malkin-Rust

      Would be a stacked top 6
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:05 p.m.
      #16
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 9,841
      Likes: 5,808
      Quoting: mhockey91
      Pens get absolutely fleeced. I wouldn’t trade Murray for Saad 1 for 1


      I think it would be fair to say that we could get at the very least a first for saad at next deadline. Assuming this deal is done in the offseason, you get Saad for the entire year, at half of his cost, for a first round pick and one of your excess (Who would also be your backup) goalies.

      I think it’s a price the pens would be willing to pay, and a price the hawks would give up Saad for.
      SociallyHawkward liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:06 p.m.
      #17
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 9,841
      Likes: 5,808
      Quoting: mhockey91
      Says the hawks fan lol. You’re delusional if you think pens would trade Murray for a guy who gets 40-50 points now. If you knew anything, you’d know that Tampa overpaid for those guys because
      #1- they lacked physicality in the playoffs last year
      #2- they have such a low cap hit
      #3- they’re signed beyond next season
      #4- it was at deadline and teams overpay then

      Saad is a nice piece but we’re not trading our 2X Stanley cup goalie for a UFA forward on a 6 million dollar contract who hasn’t been good since Columbus.


      I think you are oversimplifying things a bit no?
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:08 p.m.
      #18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 8,280
      Likes: 4,924
      Quoting: mhockey91
      Says the hawks fan lol. You’re delusional if you think pens would trade Murray for a guy who gets 40-50 points now. If you knew anything, you’d know that Tampa overpaid for those guys because
      #1- they lacked physicality in the playoffs last year
      #2- they have such a low cap hit
      #3- they’re signed beyond next season
      #4- it was at deadline and teams overpay then

      Saad is a nice piece but we’re not trading our 2X Stanley cup goalie for a UFA forward on a 6 million dollar contract who hasn’t been good since Columbus.


      Murray was awful last year. If you don't trade him somewhere you lose him to seattle. Don't care that he won 2 cups, so did saad. So did crawford who had a .917 save % behind an awful defence last year compared to murrays .898. Also, if you ever watched saad you would know he's a top 10 defensive forward in the league. Combine that with 50 points a year and thats a whole lot more value than the struggling matt murray, I'mcompletly against trading saad at all and i'm against trading for murray. theres no reason to do that when we can keep crow short term who is better anyways and can sign a UFA or trade for someone down the road who is a lot better than murray anyways. Saad is too important to chicago to trow him away unless we decide to do a full rebuild, in which case draft picks would be more important coming back anyways. Trading saad in his prime for a struggling goalie is the last thing the hawks should be doing
      SociallyHawkward liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:09 p.m.
      #19
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      I think it would be fair to say that we could get at the very least a first for saad at next deadline. Assuming this deal is done in the offseason, you get Saad for the entire year, at half of his cost, for a first round pick and one of your excess (Who would also be your backup) goalies.

      I think it’s a price the pens would be willing to pay, and a price the hawks would give up Saad for.


      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      I think you are oversimplifying things a bit no?


      Trade values are always less in the offseason because come deadline teams are desperate. Look at how many gross overpays there have been at the deadline. Saad at deadline like you said may be worth a first. But he’s not getting you Murray + a first that’s ridiculous. Murray is not our “backup”.

      I would trade a first for Saad retained. But not Murray
      MisstheWhalers liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:09 p.m.
      #20
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 8,280
      Likes: 4,924
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      I think it would be fair to say that we could get at the very least a first for saad at next deadline. Assuming this deal is done in the offseason, you get Saad for the entire year, at half of his cost, for a first round pick and one of your excess (Who would also be your backup) goalies.

      I think it’s a price the pens would be willing to pay, and a price the hawks would give up Saad for.


      agreed, but I don't want murray. If we trade saad it's at the TDL for a 1st and a B prospect, or better yet don't trade him at all
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:10 p.m.
      #21
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 8,280
      Likes: 4,924
      Quoting: mhockey91
      Trade values are always less in the offseason because come deadline teams are desperate. Look at how many gross overpays there have been at the deadline. Saad at deadline like you said may be worth a first. But he’s not getting you Murray + a first that’s ridiculous. Murray is not our “backup”.

      I would trade a first for Saad retained. But not Murray


      teams have reportetly already offered us a 1st for saad many times and the hawks always decline
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:11 p.m.
      #22
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: Wadejos123
      Murray was awful last year. If you don't trade him somewhere you lose him to seattle. Don't care that he won 2 cups, so did saad. So did crawford who had a .917 save % behind an awful defence last year compared to murrays .898. Also, if you ever watched saad you would know he's a top 10 defensive forward in the league. Combine that with 50 points a year and thats a whole lot more value than the struggling matt murray, I'mcompletly against trading saad at all and i'm against trading for murray. theres no reason to do that when we can keep crow short term who is better anyways and can sign a UFA or trade for someone down the road who is a lot better than murray anyways. Saad is too important to chicago to trow him away unless we decide to do a full rebuild, in which case draft picks would be more important coming back anyways. Trading saad in his prime for a struggling goalie is the last thing the hawks should be doing


      Top 10 best Defensive forwards in the league? That’s funny lol. Sure Murray had a bad year this season. No denying that. So why do we sell low on him? Would be a huge mistake when just last season he rocked a very solid .919 save percentage. We’ve all seen what Matt Murray is capable off in the playoffs. Pens will not trade low for him unless he absolutely chokes against MTL which I doubt
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:12 p.m.
      #23
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: Wadejos123
      teams have reportetly already offered us a 1st for saad many times and the hawks always decline


      Well that’s a fair offer for him. Hawks are trying to save face because they mistakenly traded Panarin for him.
      MisstheWhalers liked this.
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:12 p.m.
      #24
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2017
      Posts: 8,280
      Likes: 4,924
      Quoting: mhockey91
      Top 10 best Defensive forwards in the league? That’s funny lol. Sure Murray had a bad year this season. No denying that. So why do we sell low on him? Would be a huge mistake when just last season he rocked a very solid .919 save percentage. We’ve all seen what Matt Murray is capable off in the playoffs. Pens will not trade low for him unless he absolutely chokes against MTL which I doubt


      How are you going to protect murray and jarry from seattle?
      Jun. 16, 2020 at 10:15 p.m.
      #25
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: Wadejos123
      How are you going to protect murray and jarry from seattle?


      Like @pharrow has said in other posts. Pens will probably have a deal in place with Seattle where they take Jarry and hornqvist well before the expansion draft. That lets Pittsburgh hold Jarry throughout the 20/21 season and guarantees Seattle a young starter.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll