SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Possible CBO Players for Each Team - Your Opinion

Created by: CAL28
Team: 2019-20 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 17, 2020
Published: Jun. 19, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If there is a CBO, a list of possible CBO players for each team :

(If there are 2 players from a team, I think the team will trade one of them to another team so they CBO him in exchange of draft picks / propsects).

What do you guys think about the players?

ATLANTIC

- Boston : John Moore
- Buffalo : Kyle Okposo
- Detroit : Frans Nielsen / Justin Abdelkeder
- Florida : Mike Matheson / Sergei Bobrovsky ?
- Montreal : Karl Alzner
- Ottawa : Bobby Ryan
- Tampa Bay : Yanni Gourde ?
- Toronto : -

METROPOLITAN

- Carolina : -
- Colombus : Alexander Wennberg ?
- New Jersey : Cory Schneider
- New York Islanders : Andrew Ladd
- New Yor Rangers : Brendan Smith / Henrik Lundqvist?
- Philadelphia : -
- Pittsburgh : Jack Johnson
- Washington : Richard Panik ?

CENTRAL

- Chicago : Brent Seabrook
- Colorado : -
- Dallas : -
- Minnesota : Zach Parise / Victor Rask
- Nashville : Kyle Turris
- St-Louis : Jake Allen / Tyler Bozak
- Winnipeg : Bryan Little ?

PACIFIC

- Anaheim : Ryan Kesler
- Arizona : Alex Goligoski
- Calgary : Milan Lucic
- Edmonton : James Neal
- Los Angeles : Dustin Brown
- San Jose : Marc-Édouard Vlasic / Martin Jones
- Vancouver : Loui Eriksson
- Vegas : -


I have 31 players, all of them would become UFAs, which one would you sign, to give him a second chance ?
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
31$81,500,000$169,071,795$0$0-$87,571,795
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,375,000$1,375,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,900,000$4,900,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,291,667$5,291,667
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$10,000,000$10,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$5,475,000$5,475,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,350,000$4,350,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,350,000$4,350,000
LD/RD, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:00 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 56
Likes: 15
What about Toronto?
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:04 a.m.
#2
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Noir_AG
What about Toronto?


They dont have anybody who is CBO worthy.
CAL28 and palhal liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:21 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,291
Likes: 19,539
Ottawa has to reach the floor they wouldnt use a CBO even if it was available. Besides the player still gets paid and Melnyk has no interest in that
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:24 a.m.
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,490
Likes: 22,664
If Kesler is gonna be a lifer on LTIR, there is no reason for Ducks to CBO him. Actually under the CBA, teams can't buyout a player on LTIR.
Leafs need to shed cap (like a lotta teams), so Johnsson would be my choice as a CBO since the Leafs have a winger replacement. But Johnsson is tradeable with no cap returned, even if the return to the Leafs is modest.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:28 a.m.
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,490
Likes: 22,664
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ottawa has to reach the floor they wouldnt use a CBO even if it was available. Besides the player still gets paid and Melnyk has no interest in that


Reach the floor? Ottawa is at 42m with just 9 players. They have just 19m to reach the floor with 14 roster spots., easily doable. Agree with you that there is no reason for Sens to buyout out anyone.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:31 a.m.
#6
Canes Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 1,250
Staal, Skjei
ConnorMcHellebucyk liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:36 a.m.
#7
Buljujarvi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 2,552
Quoting: SammyT_51
They dont have anybody who is CBO worthy.


Johnsson could make a serious case.

In almost all Agms I see with Toronto, he’s being traded off.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:39 a.m.
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,490
Likes: 22,664
Quoting: jslongo
Staal, Skjei


Gee, after trading a 1st rounder to acquire Skjei. Gotta think Skjei is tradeable...some time will take the contract.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:41 a.m.
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,490
Likes: 22,664
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
Johnsson could make a serious case.

In almost all Agms I see with Toronto, he’s being traded off.


Agree with you, though I think some team would acquire Johnson even if it's for a 6th rounder..so then the Leafs wouldn't have a CBO. Then the Leafs might acquire another team CBO for a sweetener.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 7:42 a.m.
#10
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
Johnsson could make a serious case.

In almost all Agms I see with Toronto, he’s being traded off.


And he has a really good contract so that wouldnt make much sense. Its mostly due to left side being stacked in Toronto, not his contract.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 8:08 a.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: palhal
If Kesler is gonna be a lifer on LTIR, there is no reason for Ducks to CBO him. Actually under the CBA, teams can't buyout a player on LTIR.
Leafs need to shed cap (like a lotta teams), so Johnsson would be my choice as a CBO since the Leafs have a winger replacement. But Johnsson is tradeable with no cap returned, even if the return to the Leafs is modest.


Likely they could trade him to a team with a CBO for additional assets and save that team money. Like Edmonton for Neal and a couple of picks one being a 2nd or a prospect. Then Edmonton could buy out Russel and really shed cap space.
CAL28 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 8:13 a.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
Johnsson could make a serious case.

In almost all Agms I see with Toronto, he’s being traded off.


Because he's the most replaceable player on the Leafs who makes more than a million. It's not because he isn't valuable. He's a very good player on a team friendly deal. He's exactly the type of player Edmonton should want. Fast, young, capable of playing in the NHL and on a team friendly deal. TO's problem is they have too many good player and it means someone is going to have to go. TO has more solid lefty options than righties so trading Kapanen doesn't make as much sense. Personally I think Johnsson is better than Kapanen, he has more skill and more tools in the shed but we have Mikheyev, Robertson, Engval, Barbarov etc that can all play in the bottom or mid 6. This is why Johnsson gets traded all the time. Not because he isn't worth having but because it's a cap world and the Leafs have many players worth keeping around. If the Cap went up by 2-3 million this summer, this wouldn't be the case.
palhal and CAL28 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 8:14 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: SammyT_51
And he has a really good contract so that wouldnt make much sense. Its mostly due to left side being stacked in Toronto, not his contract.


This is classic capfriendly logic, oh you want to move a player for reasons I don't care to consider? It's a cap dump he's trash I'll give you nothing for him. Everyone is saying the same thing so it's true now.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 8:16 a.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: palhal
Agree with you, though I think some team would acquire Johnson even if it's for a 6th rounder..so then the Leafs wouldn't have a CBO. Then the Leafs might acquire another team CBO for a sweetener.


He's worth a lot more than a 6th rounder. He's a good player on a good contract. There are guys who don't produce much more than him, are older and people think they have more value than Johnsson. "But his knee injury" McDavid and Human both just came off knee injuries and they both had terrific seasons. But Johnsson won't because that makes the argument for him being worthless seem a little more reasonable. It doesn't Johnsson has values.
CAL28 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 8:21 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 6
I cant see LA buying out Brown. There would probably be a mob of LA fans with pitchforks and torches coming at Rob Blake all over LA if he did that. I really can only see one person and that is Jeff Carter but he is currently rehabbing from his core muscle surgery he had a couple weeks ago(aka Sidney Crosby injury this season) Also there probably would have been one more person if Blake never made the Campbell & cliffy to Leafs. I would add Quick but not anymore.
CAL28 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 9:02 a.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: SammyT_51
They dont have anybody who is CBO worthy.


Then why did you choose someone for most other teams?

Bruins dont have anyone CBO worthy either? They would rather just trade away john Moore to a team for a 6th or 7th rounder
Jun. 19, 2020 at 9:09 a.m.
#17
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Then why did you choose someone for most other teams?

Bruins dont have anyone CBO worthy either? They would rather just trade away john Moore to a team for a 6th or 7th rounder


Why did I do what? This is not my post..
Jun. 19, 2020 at 9:19 a.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: SammyT_51
Why did I do what? This is not my post..


My b dawg, but the point remains:
why do you think OP made some teams with no good CBO option CBO someone, but others (like the leafs) didnt

Bruins dont have a good CBO option, but he went with Moore anyway.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 9:31 a.m.
#19
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,916
Likes: 8,569
I'd go for Gourde and Wennberg
CAL28 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 9:42 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 522
As a Bruins fan, I would like to see them pick up Lucic on a league minimum deal for a year, for old times sake.
CAL28 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 9:58 a.m.
#21
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
My b dawg, but the point remains:
why do you think OP made some teams with no good CBO option CBO someone, but others (like the leafs) didnt

Bruins dont have a good CBO option, but he went with Moore anyway.


Not sure about what OP thought. Bruins dont have anybody that is justified to get CBOd. They had in Backes but they dont have now.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 10:02 a.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: SammyT_51
Not sure about what OP thought. Bruins dont have anybody that is justified to get CBOd. They had in Backes but they dont have now.


Precisely man, again my B thought u were OP when u responded to that guy lol

But yeah Bruins would rather just trade Moore for a 6th or 7th
SammyT_51 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 10:03 a.m.
#23
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,490
Likes: 22,664
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
He's worth a lot more than a 6th rounder. He's a good player on a good contract. There are guys who don't produce much more than him, are older and people think they have more value than Johnsson. "But his knee injury" McDavid and Human both just came off knee injuries and they both had terrific seasons. But Johnsson won't because that makes the argument for him being worthless seem a little more reasonable. It doesn't Johnsson has values.


With a flat cap, and so many teams near the cap, a player like Johnsson (and there are lots of them) don't have much "trading" value . His "playing value" is certainly higher than 6th rounder. But with so few buyers , and these buyers have a choice of "dumps", sellers can't be choosy. Just getting these players off your hands for cap reasons is important, not the return in the trade .
Jun. 19, 2020 at 10:19 a.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: palhal
With a flat cap, and so many teams near the cap, a player like Johnsson (and there are lots of them) don't have much "trading" value . His "playing value" is certainly higher than 6th rounder. But with so few buyers , and these buyers have a choice of "dumps", sellers can't be choosy. Just getting these players off your hands for cap reasons is important, not the return in the trade .


There are a lot of teams that would benefit from him and have the space to add him. This whole, he's a camp dump because of flat cap ideal is not accurate I believe.
CAL28 liked this.
Jun. 19, 2020 at 10:26 a.m.
#25
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: palhal
With a flat cap, and so many teams near the cap, a player like Johnsson (and there are lots of them) don't have much "trading" value . His "playing value" is certainly higher than 6th rounder. But with so few buyers , and these buyers have a choice of "dumps", sellers can't be choosy. Just getting these players off your hands for cap reasons is important, not the return in the trade .


I just did a look at several teams, there are many that could use extra scoring and finding that for less than 4 million isn't going to be easy. There will be interest in Johnsson and it will be a much better return than a 6th. Especially if there is a CBO in the off season, if that happens, a team like Edmonton or New York Islanders or many other teams with more than 1 really bad contract on the books will look at Johnsson as a way to get rid of another bad contract and upgrade a position. The Islanders could move Boychuck and something rather sizeable as far as a pick or prospect for Johnsson and then TO can just buyout Boychuck. Or Andrew Ladd if Islander fans lose their mind about it. The Islanders need space to sign Barzal and their defence and eventually Dobson and others, their long term cap situation is easily the worst in the league and getting rid of one or 3 of their bad contracts is going to be paramount if they want to prevent cap Armageddon.
CAL28 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll