SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dvorak

Created by: Wadejos123
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 22, 2020
Published: Jun. 22, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
AZ fans, is dvorak available and if so is this enough to get him? Would love to get the home town kid back to Chicago. Assume extensions on Brodin and Saad for the sake of this post
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,500,000
1$1,100,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$4,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Lundell, Anton
3$925,000
Trades
1.
2.
MIN
  1. Caggiula, Drake [RFA Rights]
  2. Sikura, Dylan
  3. Strome, Dylan [RFA Rights]
  4. 2020 4th round pick (CHI)
3.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$74,047,639$1,090,244$5,050,000$7,452,361
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Lundell, Anton
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:20 a.m.
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
Declined, Dvorak is vital to the Coyotes
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:21 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Arizona and Toronto decline pretty quick. & the Minnesota deal might have the parameters to it, but would have to be re-worked a bit
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
#3
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 3,569
Flip Kapanen to the Wild instead of all that junk and i would seriously consider making the deal - Brodin and Hartman for Strome and Kapanen.
RazWild liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:25 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,185
Likes: 4,788
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Arizona and Toronto decline pretty quick. & the Minnesota deal might have the parameters to it, but would have to be re-worked a bit


Toronto deal has been pretty widley agreed upon on this site. You definetly could be right about the AZ deal, I really wasn't sure
ChiHawk liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:27 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,185
Likes: 4,788
Quoting: MNBassman
Flip Kapanen to the Wild instead of all that junk and i would seriously consider making the deal - Brodin and Hartman for Strome and Kapanen.


Zero chance. Strome for Brodin has been widley agreed upson by both sides, and cagulla is better than hartman and Cagulla is only like 7 months older so age isn't really an agument. Sikura is an NHL level player who just hasn't got a chance in Chicago
ChiHawk liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:27 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,185
Likes: 4,788
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Declined, Dvorak is vital to the Coyotes


Figured, was worth a shot though. I know there are reports that Stan has tried to get dvorak in some of his past AZ deals and they have delcined
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
#7
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 3,569
Quoting: Wadejos123
Zero chance. Strome for Brodin has been widley agreed upson by both sides, and cagulla is better than hartman and Cagulla is only like 7 months older so age isn't really an agument. Sikura is an NHL level player who just hasn't got a chance in Chicago


No problem. (For me) Brodin would be off the table then. I feel very confident that Brodin’s worth is greater than Strome’s is.
Trickster liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:33 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,728
Likes: 1,559
Tbh Raanta on his own probably costs you at least a 3rd or 2.

And Dvorak has more value than guys like Nylander and Strome. I don’t think this starts the conversation. (He’s closer to Debrincat’s ballpark than Nylander’s)
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:48 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,185
Likes: 4,788
Quoting: MNBassman
No problem. (For me) Brodin would be off the table then. I feel very confident that Brodin’s worth is greater than Strome’s is.


Most other wild fans disagree so thats fine
MNBassman and ChiHawk liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 11:53 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,185
Likes: 4,788
Quoting: Sagecoll
Tbh Raanta on his own probably costs you at least a 3rd or 2.

And Dvorak has more value than guys like Nylander and Strome. I don’t think this starts the conversation. (He’s closer to Debrincat’s ballpark than Nylander’s)


Not even close man. Debrincat is 2 years younger and has had a season with 41 goals. Dvorak's highest is 18. Debrincat as 87 goals in 234 career games (.37 gpg) at 22 years old and dvorak has 50 goals in 246 games (.20 gpg) at 24 years old. Debrincat is also a career .74 ppg while dvorak is at a career .47 ppg. I like dvorak but he is no where close to debrincat in terms of value. He's more than nylander for sure but way less than cat.
ChiHawk liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 12:03 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,728
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: Wadejos123
Not even close man. Debrincat is 2 years younger and has had a season with 41 goals. Dvorak's highest is 18. Debrincat as 87 goals in 234 career games (.37 gpg) at 22 years old and dvorak has 50 goals in 246 games (.20 gpg) at 24 years old. Debrincat is also a career .74 ppg while dvorak is at a career .47 ppg. I like dvorak but he is no where close to debrincat in terms of value. He's more than nylander for sure but way less than cat.


oh I totally agree that Debrincat is a much better offensive player. Not even a conversation. The value for Dvorak is that he's on an awesome contract (Debrincat will be making like 10 mil in 2023-25 while Dvorak will cost less than half that), plays a premium position and is a plus defender. We know from this year's deadline deals for guys like Coleman and Goodrow that Affordable contracts carry a significant amount of weight, and relative to his ability and role, Dvorak has one of the better deals in the league.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 12:17 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,185
Likes: 4,788
Quoting: Sagecoll
oh I totally agree that Debrincat is a much better offensive player. Not even a conversation. The value for Dvorak is that he's on an awesome contract (Debrincat will be making like 10 mil in 2023-25 while Dvorak will cost less than half that), plays a premium position and is a plus defender. We know from this year's deadline deals for guys like Coleman and Goodrow that Affordable contracts carry a significant amount of weight, and relative to his ability and role, Dvorak has one of the better deals in the league.


I don't think Debrincat will ever make over 10 mil per. Obviously he's at 6.4 for the next 3 years which is very affordable, I think if he can stay around 30-35 goals per year for those 3 years which is a more realistic deal for him, a long term contract around 8 years x 7.5mil per is fair. I think theres no way we give him Kane and Toews money. He will be an RFA anyways so it's not like some other team with tons of cap space can come in and swipe him away from us
Jun. 22, 2020 at 12:50 p.m.
#13
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,979
Likes: 3,299
DeBrincat for Dvorak would probably be briefly considered by Arizona
Jun. 22, 2020 at 1:09 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,185
Likes: 4,788
Quoting: Skyraider112
DeBrincat for Dvorak would probably be briefly considered by Arizona


lol thats funny
ChiHawk liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 1:31 p.m.
#15
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 3,043
Quoting: Wadejos123
Most other wild fans disagree so thats fine


Really? I can't think of a single Wild fan on here who thinks Strome for Brodin is a good idea.
MNBassman and RazWild liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:17 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,728
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: Wadejos123
I don't think Debrincat will ever make over 10 mil per. Obviously he's at 6.4 for the next 3 years which is very affordable, I think if he can stay around 30-35 goals per year for those 3 years which is a more realistic deal for him, a long term contract around 8 years x 7.5mil per is fair. I think theres no way we give him Kane and Toews money. He will be an RFA anyways so it's not like some other team with tons of cap space can come in and swipe him away from us


With a new tv rights deal and expansion going through. In 3 years the cap could be through the roof.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:19 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Not available, and that package isn't in the ballpark, that Dvo contract is a steal, second best on the team (Chychrun's is one of the nest in the league) by a huge margin
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:39 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: MNBassman
Flip Kapanen to the Wild instead of all that junk and i would seriously consider making the deal - Brodin and Hartman for Strome and Kapanen.


Caggs is a better version of Hartman, that would be a downgrade for the Hawks and upgrade for the Wild....and we know both players really well...especially Hartman. Add that plus Strome and a 4th and this is more then enough for Brodin.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:41 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Arizona and Toronto decline pretty quick. & the Minnesota deal might have the parameters to it, but would have to be re-worked a bit


Toronto doesn't decline that quickly and if anything Chicago would decline that. As nice as a fast winger is, one on pace for 15 goals this season and a $3.2M cap hit doesn't exactly scream a top 4 defenseman let alone a right handed one. That said, his RFA status and age make this fair, but there is no question the Leafs are filling a bigger need then the Hawks who have Saad, Kubalik, Kane and Debrincat on the wings already...Kap is not nearly as good as any of those 4.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:43 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: JayTea
Really? I can't think of a single Wild fan on here who thinks Strome for Brodin is a good idea.


Revisit multiple AGMs that have Strome and a 3rd for Brodin that folks have said is a good trade for both sides.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:46 p.m.
#21
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 3,569
Quoting: ChiHawk
Caggs is a better version of Hartman, that would be a downgrade for the Hawks and upgrade for the Wild....and we know both players really well...especially Hartman. Add that plus Strome and a 4th and this is more then enough for Brodin.


Agree to disagree.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:46 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: MNBassman
Agree to disagree.


Which part?
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:47 p.m.
#23
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 3,569
Quoting: ChiHawk
Which part?


Brodin’s value.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:53 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: MNBassman
Brodin’s value.


Okay. I like Brodin for sure, but a center who just turned 23 and had 2 seasons in a row on pace for over 50 points at the age of 21 and 22 doesn't come cheap plus he's a RFA which means Minnesota controls his cost and career.

Brodin is about to turn 27 (in days), and he's going to cost $6.5M ish...a lot more then Strome and 4 years older. He's not a true #1 even though the Hawks would use him as one. Strome's not a true #1C even though the Wild will use as one too. The trade makes sense for both teams and when you factor in age, control of the players career, cost....Strome and Brodin are close. A 4th and getting Caggs over Hartman is more then enough. If it isn't, the Hawks should easily walk away.

Hawks could use a top 3 defenseman for sure, Wild absolutely need a top 6 center.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 2:56 p.m.
#25
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 3,569
Quoting: ChiHawk
Okay. I like Brodin for sure, but a center who just turned 23 and had 2 seasons in a row on pace for over 50 points at the age of 21 and 22 doesn't come cheap plus he's a RFA which means Minnesota controls his cost and career.

Brodin is about to turn 27 (in days), and he's going to cost $6.5M ish...a lot more then Strome and 4 years older. He's not a true #1 even though the Hawks would use him as one. Strome's not a true #1C even though the Wild will use as one too. The trade makes sense for both teams and when you factor in age, control of the players career, cost....Strome and Brodin are close. A 4th and getting Caggs over Hartman is more then enough. If it isn't, the Hawks should easily walk away.

Hawks could use a top 3 defenseman for sure, Wild absolutely need a top 6 center.


Everything you just wrote makes sense, is well written, and firmly grounded in solid logic...but i still think the Wild can do better for Brodin’s services.
ChiHawk liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll