SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

soft reboot

Created by: fckmattcooke
Team: 2020-21 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 22, 2020
Published: Jun. 22, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
let's figure this thing out baby
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,650,000
2$1,500,000
3$3,700,000
6$5,500,000
2$1,400,000
1$900,000
3$2,750,000
4$2,250,000
2$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$4,000,000
5$5,250,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Graves, Ryan [RFA Rights]
  2. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
  3. Ranta, Sampo [Reserve List]
  4. 2020 1st round pick (COL)
COL
  1. Reinhart, Sam [RFA Rights]
2.
BUF
  1. Borgström, Henrik [RFA Rights]
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (FLA)
3.
BUF
  1. Smith, Zack
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (PIT)
CHI
  1. Johansson, Marcus ($2,000,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the COL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$77,193,334$1,487,500$4,337,500$4,306,666
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 3
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
$2,250,000$2,250,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$845,000$845,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
LW
UFA
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,700,000$3,700,000
RD
UFA - 1
$5,250,000$5,250,000
G
UFA - 6
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$900,000$900,000
C
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:25 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Make the 2020 2nd a third and we accept.


Sabres decline then. Not trading our 4th highest scoring forward and retaining salary for a cap dump and a third round pick
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:27 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Quoting: fckmattcooke
I am doing that. In the event Buffalo wanted to retool things, or contract talks go poorly, if Reinhart were to be traded this is what I would do. I think it would benefit them.


It wouldn’t help us make the Playoffs THIS YEAR (20-21)
That’s obviously what they need to do
Shipping out your RW1 for depth & futures doesn’t do that

Our defense is already good & deep
We need a 2C & RW2
If we trade Reinhart...
WE STILL NEED THISE POSITIONS
No... Jost isn’t a 2C
No... we don’t wanna start Cozens at RW1, we want him at 3C

Plus, now we’d need a RW1 as well
The trade makes ZERO SENSE for the Sabres


And we aren’t trading our top RD for a 4C either
You CLEARLY HAVE NO IDEA about the Sabres needs & team makeup
Just stick to your AVs dude
Way off here... WAY OFF
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:28 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: MaxDomi13
Domi = Reinhart and that doesn't = Domi

you know what lets ask some colorado fans what they think

@moli92 @coga16 @Goavs141 what do you guys think?


Reinhart over Domi. Reinhart just has been more consistent...almost year in and year out you can count on a 50-55 point season. Domi has been more of a 40-45 point player vs his career high of 72 point season (Reinhart had a career high 65 point season as well)

splitting hairs....both are roughly 250pt career players. Reinhart 400 games, Domi 375, but Reinhart has 109 goals to Domi 81. He just edges him out slightly with the more of a consistent base line of 50 points with the higher goals total
deleted_x_213212 liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:29 p.m.
#29
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 8,559
Quoting: coga16
Reinhart over Domi. Reinhart just has been more consistent...almost year in and year out you can count on a 50-55 point season. Domi has been more of a 40-45 point player vs his career high of 72 point season (Reinhart had a career high 65 point season as well)


Yea ik but don't you think that its a very popular trade on here?
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:32 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 1,053
Edited Jun. 22, 2020 at 8:02 p.m.
I didn't think I could possibly look at the Sabres down the middle going into next year and feel like they could be in worse shape then they were last year. Then I saw this ACGM team ugh. Only 1 of those centers after Eichel belongs in the nhl at the start of next season and he should probably be playing third line RW
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:32 p.m.
#31
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 921
Likes: 171
Quoting: coga16
Reinhart over Domi. Reinhart just has been more consistent...almost year in and year out you can count on a 50-55 point season. Domi has been more of a 40-45 point player vs his career high of 72 point season (Reinhart had a career high 65 point season as well)

splitting hairs....both are roughly 250pt career players. Reinhart 400 games, Domi 375, but Reinhart has 109 goals to Domi 81. He just edges him out slightly with the more of a consistent base line of 50 points with the higher goals total


Quoting: MaxDomi13
Yea ik but don't you think that its a very popular trade on here?


Domi also has very negative impacts in his own end, where as Reinhart is positive. And drives play better on offence.
deleted_x_213212 liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:32 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: MaxDomi13
Yea ik but don't you think that its a very popular trade on here?


the Reinhart one? Avs and Sabres fans have been chatting about it the last couple days, and its a pretty common trade proposals based on those parts.
deleted_x_213212 liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:32 p.m.
#33
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 8,559
Quoting: fckmattcooke
Domi also has very negative impacts in his own end, where as Reinhart is positive. And drives play better on offence.


Domi for Reinhart is a pretty popular Domi trade on here, and nobody seems to have anything wrong with it
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:33 p.m.
#34
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 8,559
Quoting: coga16
the Reinhart one? Avs and Sabres fans have been chatting about it the last couple days, and its a pretty common trade proposals based on those parts.


Reinhart for Domi
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:33 p.m.
#35
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,831
Likes: 5,799
Quoting: dzmets
Sabres decline then. Not trading our 4th highest scoring forward and retaining salary for a cap dump and a third round pick


Okay, you can delete the trade.
ChiHawk liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:34 p.m.
#36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: fckmattcooke
Domi also has very negative impacts in his own end, where as Reinhart is positive. And drives play better on offence.


I figured that was the case too, didnt want to dive to much into it. I feel thats why Reinhart in that 6.5m-7m range might happen. Domi I dont think makes that argument and will be more in the 6m range
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:34 p.m.
#37
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: MaxDomi13
Domi for Reinhart is a pretty popular Domi trade on here, and nobody seems to have anything wrong with it


ive never seen that trade before to be honest or haven't noticed it before but im not seaching that out
zk97 liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:35 p.m.
#38
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 921
Likes: 171
Quoting: Jdfitz77
It wouldn’t help us make the Playoffs THIS YEAR (20-21)
That’s obviously what they need to do
Shipping out your RW1 for depth & futures doesn’t do that

Our defense is already good & deep
We need a 2C & RW2
If we trade Reinhart...
WE STILL NEED THISE POSITIONS
No... Jost isn’t a 2C
No... we don’t wanna start Cozens at RW1, we want him at 3C

Plus, now we’d need a RW1 as well
The trade makes ZERO SENSE for the Sabres


And we aren’t trading our top RD for a 4C either
You CLEARLY HAVE NO IDEA about the Sabres needs & team makeup
Just stick to your AVs dude
Way off here... WAY OFF


Okay well the Sabres haven't had a balanced roster once in the last 10 years and I think this is the chance to do that. I don't care that they might not make the playoffs in 20-21. Jost has the floor of a 3C, he's proven there, let him go somewhere he can test his ceiling. Cozens won't be a centre in the NHL. Risto is not a top pairing D and is overpaid, go for upside with Borgstrom.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:42 p.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Quoting: fckmattcooke
Okay well the Sabres haven't had a balanced roster once in the last 10 years and I think this is the chance to do that. I don't care that they might not make the playoffs in 20-21. Jost has the floor of a 3C, he's proven there, let him go somewhere he can test his ceiling. Cozens won't be a centre in the NHL. Risto is not a top pairing D and is overpaid, go for upside with Borgstrom.


A guy you’re playing at 4C doesn’t have “upside” worth a RD who plays 20+ min a night

And the rest of this just continues to show your lack of understanding of the situation in Buffalo
Eichel is pissed
We need to make the playoffs
Taking away his linemate DOES NOT HELP
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:43 p.m.
#40
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,990
Likes: 9,300
Quoting: dzmets
Sabres decline then. Not trading our 4th highest scoring forward and retaining salary for a cap dump and a third round pick


Not trading the 2nd round pick. A 3rd and a prospect for Smith and retaining.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:44 p.m.
#41
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 921
Likes: 171
Quoting: Jdfitz77
A guy you’re playing at 4C doesn’t have “upside” worth a RD who plays 20+ min a night

And the rest of this just continues to show your lack of understanding of the situation in Buffalo
Eichel is pissed
We need to make the playoffs
Taking away his linemate DOES NOT HELP


Right because I have him listed at 4C means that is the only spot he can ever play.
I do understand the situation and Eichel should be pissed, I am sharing on the website cap friendly.com what I would do from a roster building perspective.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:51 p.m.
#42
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Quoting: fckmattcooke
Right because I have him listed at 4C means that is the only spot he can ever play.
I do understand the situation and Eichel should be pissed, I am sharing on the website cap friendly.com what I would do from a roster building perspective.


To be what, a 3C?
You still don’t trade a RD who plays 20+ min a night for a guy who MIGHT become a 3C
You can get that for MUCH MUCH LESS

And again...
it’s not the value so much as it doesn’t meet the team needs to WIN NOW

That trade could look good in a couple years
But by then,
we’ll have continued to miss the playoffs & Eichel would definitely want out by then

So no... we just can’t trade Sam for that type of a return
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 5:59 p.m.
#43
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Quoting: fckmattcooke
Right because I have him listed at 4C means that is the only spot he can ever play.
I do understand the situation and Eichel should be pissed, I am sharing on the website cap friendly.com what I would do from a roster building perspective.


And dude...
you CLEARLY don’t understand this team at all

-Cozens will play Center, Mittelstadt is moving to the wing most likely
-we’ve been gambling at the 2C spot since we traded O’Reilly,
there’s NO WAY we gamble again with Jost in that spot
-Olofsson plays LW, not RW (regardless of what this site says)
-Larsson & Girgensons were the KEY players on our defensive line that did quite well, they’ve already been offered contracts
-McCabe is our best defensive defenseman, not a “scratch”
-Pilut signed to play in the KHL
-Ullmark was fine, it’s Hutton that needs to be replaced
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 6:14 p.m.
#44
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: MaxDomi13
Domi = Reinhart and that doesn't = Domi

you know what lets ask some colorado fans what they think

@moli92 @coga16 @Goavs141 what do you guys think?


I'd rank Reinhart ahead of Domi but they are still pretty comparable players. There is some recency bias towards Reinhart since Domi had a down year but I think he'll bounce back to 60-70 points next season
zk97 liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 6:38 p.m.
#45
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: moli92
I'd rank Reinhart ahead of Domi but they are still pretty comparable players. There is some recency bias towards Reinhart since Domi had a down year but I think he'll bounce back to 60-70 points next season


The only thing is domi has been a 45 range player outside of the 1 70 point year. Reinhart has been a 55 point range player with a 65 point outlier season. There just seems to be a safer bet of a median point range with reinhart. Domi you need to see one more season, no clue what type of player he is yet
UpsideDownQue liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 6:45 p.m.
#46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 6,514
Quoting: MaxDomi13
We'll see what coga and moli say, and in the meantime let's bring in some sabres and habs fans to see what they think about reinhart vs domi - @GMs @Sabres923 @BuFfaLOFaN @Tank4McEichel


I agree they ate pretty equal, I'd give the edge for grit and in front of the net to Reinhart and speed to Domi, as a sabres fan I'd keep Reinhart but I'd say they are pretty close not quite a bit better. I'd say I cod see Reinhart becoming quite a bit better though.
Sabres923 and zk97 liked this.
Jun. 22, 2020 at 6:49 p.m.
#47
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Edited Jun. 22, 2020 at 6:56 p.m.
Quoting: coga16
The only thing is domi has been a 45 range player outside of the 1 70 point year. Reinhart has been a 55 point range player with a 65 point outlier season. There just seems to be a safer bet of a median point range with reinhart. Domi you need to see one more season, no clue what type of player he is yet


Thats true. Reinhart is a safer bet. But Domi was also playing in ARZ's garbage offensive system for his first 3 years (but i guess you could say the same about Reinhart - he does get more offensive linemates though). In his 2 years with MTL he had 72pts and was on pace for 50pts this season. I think he averages out somewhere in the middle. For purposes of comparison he also gets over a minute less PP time per game and doesnt get the benefit of playing on Eichels wing so theres a lot more to look into. imo they would have pretty close offensive production if they were used in the same role and given the same opportunities
Jun. 22, 2020 at 7:00 p.m.
#48
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 4,915
hawks accept
Jun. 22, 2020 at 7:01 p.m.
#49
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 4,915
Quoting: ChiHawk
Not trading the 2nd round pick. A 3rd and a prospect for Smith and retaining.


I think the hawks would accept this. That PIT 2nd is gonna be late in the round, Johanson at pretty much half price and they take smith is worth it to me
fckmattcooke and ChiHawk liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll