SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

ACCEPTABLE

Created by: Claesson4Norris
Team: 2020-21 Ottawa Senators
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 26, 2020
Published: Jun. 26, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Stutzle, Tim
3$925,000
Raymond, Lucas
3$925,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
2021
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
2022
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
13$81,500,000$37,504,167$0$2,500,000$43,995,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,550,000$4,550,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,875,000$4,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Stutzle, Tim
$925,000$925,000
Raymond, Lucas
$925,000$925,000
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$900,000$900,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LD
UFA - 8

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:29 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,250
Likes: 3,963
wouldn't you take Drysdale with 5? Your RD is kinda thin
csick liked this.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:29 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Congrats on the german and Drysdale
csick liked this.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:31 p.m.
#3
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,152
Likes: 23,514
Quoting: Wqrrior
wouldn't you take Drysdale with 5? Your RD is kinda thin


nah Stutzle and Raymond. Hoping LA takes Stutzle but i will settle for him
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:31 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 576
Still a damn fine draft coming for Ottawa. Id be upset if it were #1 as a Sharks fan but you guys are still getting amazing prospects and have a very bright future.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:31 p.m.
#5
Sports and Tacos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 601
I am actually ok with this.

Obviously wanted Laf... But will settle for a top 3
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:33 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Wqrrior
wouldn't you take Drysdale with 5? Your RD is kinda thin


JBD/Zub/Thompson/Jaros, no top pair guy, but by no means thin, and weak enough to consider taking a worse player than Rossi/Raymond at 5
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:34 p.m.
#7
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,925
Likes: 2,686
OTT & BUFF just have no luck!
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:37 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,250
Likes: 3,963
Quoting: AFOX10900
JBD/Zub/Thompson/Jaros, no top pair guy, but by no means thin, and weak enough to consider taking a worse player than Rossi/Raymond at 5


Isn't jaros a likely #6/7 ? Zub is already older, hasn't played a game yet. JBD is unsigned and getting older, an offensive D yeah? Thompson is good, but not really to that extent?
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:38 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,883
Likes: 11,894
Quoting: Wqrrior
wouldn't you take Drysdale with 5? Your RD is kinda thin


It's not ideal, but Lassi Thomson and JBD both look like top 4 options, and Brannstrom prefers to play the right side.

In my opinion, the much bigger issue is the lack of elite forward talent. Brady is/will be that, and Norris and Batherson have the potential to be that, but I think they're in the tier just below elite. If they add en elite 1C like Stutzle and then a play driving winger who can play on the 2nd line, they'll be in a much better position than if they add Drysdale.
Dan10900 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:40 p.m.
#10
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,844
Likes: 8,548
HAHA
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:42 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Wqrrior
Isn't jaros a likely #6/7 ? Zub is already older, hasn't played a game yet. JBD is unsigned and getting older, an offensive D yeah? Thompson is good, but not really to that extent?


Chabot-Thompson is not a terrible first pair, JBD can be top 4, Zub was probably the best Euro FA, before Lehtonen, can be a stopgap top 4 guy and really solid bottom pair guy, with Jaros as depth, not great, but again, not bad enough to consider taking a guy who's a clear tier below Raymond/Rossi to fix, especially when it's not like they have a star studded forward group, Tkachuk obv, Norris has potential, but behind that...? (well Stutzle/Raymond at 3)
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:48 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,883
Likes: 11,894
Quoting: McGruff
OTT & BUFF just have no luck!


I'm actually pretty happy with 3 and 5. I went in fully expecting 5 and 6.
McGruff liked this.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:50 p.m.
#13
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,925
Likes: 2,686
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I'm actually pretty happy with 3 and 5. I went in fully expecting 5 and 6.


You are an eternal optimist my friend - I like that...
Go Sens!!
Claesson4Norris liked this.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 8:54 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,883
Likes: 11,894
Quoting: AFOX10900
Chabot-Thompson is not a terrible first pair, JBD can be top 4, Zub was probably the best Euro FA, before Lehtonen, can be a stopgap top 4 guy and really solid bottom pair guy, with Jaros as depth, not great, but again, not bad enough to consider taking a guy who's a clear tier below Raymond/Rossi to fix, especially when it's not like they have a star studded forward group, Tkachuk obv, Norris has potential, but behind that...? (well Stutzle/Raymond at 3)


I think JBD has top pair potential. I'm not a huge believer in his offensive production, but I think he's going to be an amazing defensive defenseman, and will be a great fit with Chabot.
Dan10900 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 9:01 p.m.
#15
habs_fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 690
Quoting: csick
nah Stutzle and Raymond. Hoping LA takes Stutzle but i will settle for him


id rather have stutzle than byfield
Jun. 26, 2020 at 9:05 p.m.
#16
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,152
Likes: 23,514
Quoting: habs_fan123
id rather have stutzle than byfield


People are really underrating Byfield imo, hes going to be lethal. Theyre both real good imo
Jun. 26, 2020 at 9:36 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,883
Likes: 11,894
Quoting: csick
People are really underrating Byfield imo, hes going to be lethal. Theyre both real good imo


He's got a better pure toolkit, and he's still so young. He's got so much more Development to go. Stutzle be fantastic, but by the time Byfield is 22 I don't think it will even be a question who is better
csick liked this.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 9:39 p.m.
#18
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,152
Likes: 23,514
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
He's got a better pure toolkit, and he's still so young. He's got so much more Development to go. Stutzle be fantastic, but by the time Byfield is 22 I don't think it will even be a question who is better


yes i put the odds at 65-35 that LA takes Stutzle over Byfield. We will take Byfield and one of Raymond, Drysdale. Perfetti or Sanderson as darkhorses
Jun. 26, 2020 at 9:48 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 16,883
Likes: 11,894
Quoting: csick
yes i put the odds at 65-35 that LA takes Stutzle over Byfield. We will take Byfield and one of Raymond, Drysdale. Perfetti or Sanderson as darkhorses


Byfield + Raymond would be perfect.
csick liked this.
Jun. 26, 2020 at 9:53 p.m.
#20
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,152
Likes: 23,514
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Byfield + Raymond would be perfect.


yup heres hoping thats like taking Matthews and Marner in 1 draft
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll