SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Caufield vs 7th overall pick

Created by: Pharow
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 28, 2020
Published: Jun. 28, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MTL
  1. 2020 1st round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Caufield, Cole [Reserve List]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
17$81,500,000$60,467,142$0$425,000$21,032,858
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$763,333$763,333
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:05 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 4,422
Likes: 1,457
7th overall in a deep draft for sure
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:05 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
MTL isn’t doing that
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:06 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: keep_ups12
7th overall in a deep draft for sure


They might want to reunite Hugues and Caufield but MTL won’t trade their best prospect who’s a goal scorer
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:07 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Caufield dropped in a less deep draft no way he is a piece that gets you in the top 10 alone.

I like caufield alot and did not think he was gonna fall like that but there is no chance of this trade being a straight 1 for 1
zyyyp and DirtyDangle liked this.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:10 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: GMs
They might want to reunite Hugues and Caufield but MTL won’t trade their best prospect who’s a goal scorer


And if Drysdale drop to the 7th spot ??
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:13 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
Caufield dropped in a less deep draft no way he is a piece that gets you in the top 10 alone.

I like caufield alot and did not think he was gonna fall like that but there is no chance of this trade being a straight 1 for 1


In any mock redraft of last year cole caufield is almost always a top 5 or top 10 so your point about is rank last year is irrelevant. The fact that he have been one of the most hyped prospect around the league make him much more valuable then you think. A guys like philip Broberg have lost tremendous value since he havent had a good development year this season. The fact that he was drafted ahead of Caufield doesn’t make him more valuable.
GMs liked this.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:17 p.m.
#7
Evans truther
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 1,434
Caufield fell in his draft because of size, that's fine it happens every year or so but why in the hell would we trade him -who just won freshman of the year-? That's why Montreal's idling for the past 10 years, as soon as we get a new toy we want to get rid of the previous one; KK vs Poehling, Juulsen vs Fleury, Domi vs Suzuki and now Caufield vs a pick (Most likely Holtz?). Can't we just enjoy what we have and keep a complete roster instead of trading everyone?
GMs liked this.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:19 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: Pharow
In any mock redraft of last year cole caufield is almost always a top 5 or top 10 so your point about is rank last year is irrelevant. The fact that he have been one of the most hyped prospect around the league make him much more valuable then you think. A guys like philip Broberg have lost tremendous value since he havent had a good development year this season. The fact that he was drafted ahead of Caufield doesn’t make him more valuable.


It does matter pretty much the same GMs were at the bottom last year could have taken caufield and did not I cant see anyone trading a top 10 pick in a better draft for caufield now.
Like I said I think caufield was top 10 last year for sure
And it didnt shake up that way. And he had a good season in NCAA but nothing to warrant a top 10 pick this year.
Perfetti rossi raymond drysdale are all better than caufield
Holtz is close both goal scorers
So you already out of the top 7 8
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:26 p.m.
#9
Boris Bagel
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 599
Drysdale will go top 5 for sure
GMs liked this.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:35 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
It does matter pretty much the same GMs were at the bottom last year could have taken caufield and did not I cant see anyone trading a top 10 pick in a better draft for caufield now.
Like I said I think caufield was top 10 last year for sure
And it didnt shake up that way. And he had a good season in NCAA but nothing to warrant a top 10 pick this year.
Perfetti rossi raymond drysdale are all better than caufield
Holtz is close both goal scorers
So you already out of the top 7 8


All better ahahah and based on what can you say such thing. Your opinion is not a fact. They are all good prospect but the only three great prospect are laffy Stutzle and Byfield after no one is clearly better then Caufield they are player with offensive potential ( rossi, holtz, raymond or Perfetti) same a Caufield
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:43 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 1,486
Devils pass, they're likely to get a better player than Caufield with that pick.
DirtyDangle liked this.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 6:54 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: Pharow
And if Drysdale drop to the 7th spot ??


Drysdale doesn’t fall to #6
Jun. 28, 2020 at 7:00 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: GMs
Drysdale doesn’t fall to #6


Anaheim is the number 6 and their a lot of talk that they are in complete love with Cole Perfetti. Ottawa will probably go for either Askarov or Raymond at number 5 so there a possibility that he will be available at number 7
Jun. 28, 2020 at 7:03 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: zyyyp
Devils pass, they're likely to get a better player than Caufield with that pick.


Better players? Caufield is a top 5 prospect around the league. At number 7 they will get a good players for sure but better only time will tell. The only players that have that status are Stutzle, Byfield and Lafrenière for the rest there no players that is significantly better.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 7:22 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: Pharow
All better ahahah and based on what can you say such thing. Your opinion is not a fact. They are all good prospect but the only three great prospect are laffy Stutzle and Byfield after no one is clearly better then Caufield they are player with offensive potential ( rossi, holtz, raymond or Perfetti) same a Caufield


Bro it's not just my opinion why would he drop to 15 last year then. And what makes him more valuable this year? With no nhl pedigree I'm just confused on where your thinking lies
Jun. 28, 2020 at 7:22 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 445
Trading their best goal-scoring prospect since Max Pacioretty when the Habs has had the trouble to score. It would be the same as the previous trade which sent Sergachev to Tampa even though he was their only top LHD prospect.
GMs liked this.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 7:22 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: Pharow
Anaheim is the number 6 and their a lot of talk that they are in complete love with Cole Perfetti. Ottawa will probably go for either Askarov or Raymond at number 5 so there a possibility that he will be available at number 7


Rumors Raymond fell of the top10 lol Raymond isn’t better than Lafreniere Byfield Stutzle Drysdale Perfetti Rossi after you have Raymond Holtz Sanderson Askarov
Jun. 28, 2020 at 7:26 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: GMs
Rumors Raymond fell of the top10 lol Raymond isn’t better than Lafreniere Byfield Stutzle Drysdale Perfetti Rossi after you have Raymond Holtz Sanderson Askarov


There only three players that are clearly in different categories the other have some upside But depending on team preference the next 7 can go 4th or 10th there no much difference between them.
GMs liked this.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 7:31 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
Bro it's not just my opinion why would he drop to 15 last year then. And what makes him more valuable this year? With no nhl pedigree I'm just confused on where your thinking lies


How Kyle Connor have drop to 17 in 2015? He was projected top ten in most of the insider list. How Evgeny Kuznetzov have drop to 25th overall? He was supposed to go mid first round? Do you have answer for that? Draft isn’t science, the only sure thing is that Caufield would be a top 5 pick if they redo the draft.
GMs liked this.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 8:14 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 316
Likes: 98
Super interesting idea, first of all in this scenario the Devils don't pass they proposed the trade. If the Habs don't get the first overall and have the 9th pick and still wanted to go after 1st overall the 7th and 9th would help them get there. So depending on the situation.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 8:26 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: Pharow
How Kyle Connor have drop to 17 in 2015? He was projected top ten in most of the insider list. How Evgeny Kuznetzov have drop to 25th overall? He was supposed to go mid first round? Do you have answer for that? Draft isn’t science, the only sure thing is that Caufield would be a top 5 pick if they redo the draft.


How can you say that when he hasn't played in the nhl lol.. you might be right but there is nothing to that until he plays. His stock did not sky rocket to top 10 a year in the NCAA.. like please 5 years from now you might be right. But right now there is nobody trading a top 10 pick for him
Jun. 28, 2020 at 8:57 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
How can you say that when he hasn't played in the nhl lol.. you might be right but there is nothing to that until he plays. His stock did not sky rocket to top 10 a year in the NCAA.. like please 5 years from now you might be right. But right now there is nobody trading a top 10 pick for him

Actually Alex Newhook and Him have been the two best player outside of the top 3 this year. All the olayers selected before them haven’t perform at any near their level this year so yes is stock have significantly raise from last year. There at least 6 players that would be selected after him and i am very conservative on that number. Broberg, Podkolzin, Boldy, York, Spencer knight, Seider. And a case could very be made about Turcotte and Zegras. Sodestrom, Cozens and Byram look good but for the rest they have been outplayed in a big way by both Caufield and Newhook and have been in many expert list a the top of the nhl prospect list.
https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-top-100-prospects-ranking/
https://www.espn.com/nhl/insider/story/_/id/28870800/ranking-top-50-nhl-affiliated-prospects-hockey-risers-fallers-new-no-1
https://www.tsn.ca/russian-players-dominate-top-spots-in-tsn-s-ranking-of-nhl-affiliated-prospects-1.1424251

So yes again is stock have raise into top 10 since last year. These are respected insider here.
Jun. 28, 2020 at 10:26 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 2,162
Quoting: Pharow
Actually Alex Newhook and Him have been the two best player outside of the top 3 this year. All the olayers selected before them haven’t perform at any near their level this year so yes is stock have significantly raise from last year. There at least 6 players that would be selected after him and i am very conservative on that number. Broberg, Podkolzin, Boldy, York, Spencer knight, Seider. And a case could very be made about Turcotte and Zegras. Sodestrom, Cozens and Byram look good but for the rest they have been outplayed in a big way by both Caufield and Newhook and have been in many expert list a the top of the nhl prospect list.
https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-top-100-prospects-ranking/
https://www.espn.com/nhl/insider/story/_/id/28870800/ranking-top-50-nhl-affiliated-prospects-hockey-risers-fallers-new-no-1
https://www.tsn.ca/russian-players-dominate-top-spots-in-tsn-s-ranking-of-nhl-affiliated-prospects-1.1424251

So yes again is stock have raise into top 10 since last year. These are respected insider here.


If we are speaking talentwise, no way Podkolzin goes behind him. Only question there was signability. Other than that, Id put him behind Zegras and equal with Newhook (depends on how you view goal scoring vs total point production, Caufield's hands aren't great but damn can he shoot the puck), and above Turcotte. In a redraft he probably would go 7th or 8th. Would be a close call. If we are talking overall projectability sure Holtz "looks" better because he's already been playing against men and he does have better playmaking skills but I think Caufield's shot is unrivaled and there isnt really a need to take a chance when you guys already (probably) have the 9th OA.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll