SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Roasting for Raty someone plz lol

Created by: SlickWilly
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 1, 2020
Published: Jul. 1, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
So my last post was if everything stood pat going into the flat cap (post titled "flat cap"), kind of going over how Chicago isnt in too much of a cap crunch. This post is going to be a more nuclear approach in the likely scenario they do not land Lafreniere, and for simplicity's sake im not going to worry about who they could draft this year as well.
If you are curious about the mindset behind my signings and the trades I do not describe, feel free to look at my last post and as always, I would love your feedback on them.

Trade 1 : In my mind, there are 2 good landing spots for Strome, MIN and WPG, both places that are looking for a solid 2nd line center. I think the MIN trade just makes more sense, because there is the obvious target of Brodin, whereas with WPG you would have to get a little bit more creative in trying to get fair value back.

Trade 2 : So I've seen Saad underrated and overrated on this site, and while I am not going to comment on what I think his value SHOULD be, I am going to make a comparable to another trade that recently occured, that being the Jason Zucker trade. They have been very similar in production the past couple of years, with Saad having slightly more goals the past 2 years and Zucker having slightly more assists over that time. Saad is a year younger, but a big thing from that trade was Zucker's contract security, so for Saad to have that kind of value, we would likely have to guarantee he has a contract in place, lets say something like a 5x5. Mittelstadt is a reclamation project with a chance he still turns into a good forward in the NHL and Weissbach is a lotto ticket and we get a late 1st or early 2nd.
Trading these two gives us room to let the kids play a little, and if we flop, we flop into the lottery and the kids get some more experience and we are able to bounce back better next season.
Carpenter is traded so he gets consistent playing time somewhere, figure he deserves it.
If we can fit under the cap like this, we dont have to buyout Smith because he contract expires next year so there isnt the biggest need there unless someone is willing to trade for him and give us like a 4th back.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
2$4,000,000
3$4,000,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$4,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (ARI)
Additional Details:
lower of two 3rds
2.
CHI
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
some sort of condition that if he plays well this becomes a 2nd
3.
MIN
  1. Strome, Dylan
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (CGY)
4.
CHI
  1. 2020 5th round pick (VGK)
Additional Details:
anywhere
5.
CHI
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey [RFA Rights]
  2. Weissbach, Linus [Reserve List]
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
If Buff makes the playoffs and Saad scores 20 goals, the 2nd becomes a 1st.
BUF
  1. Saad, Brandon ($3,000,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$68,292,039$1,090,244$5,380,000$13,207,961
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$853,333$853,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:09 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
that's a no from the penguins.
They aren't trading away good young players with low cap hits for an OK one on a high cap hit in the flat cap world. Or ever.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:11 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: pharrow
that's a no from the penguins.
They aren't trading away good young players with low cap hits for an OK one on a high cap hit in the flat cap world. Or ever.


I tried my best to mirror the Zucker trade at the deadline, but that makes sense, would someone else fit there instead of ZAR?
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:12 p.m.
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,708
Likes: 31,448
Imo Saad to Pens doesn't work since they don't have the money.

You could get a lot better return for Saad if he's half retained from some other team. Although I don't think there's going to be many, if at all sign-and-trade kind of moves due to the forthcoming expansion draft, as it forces one to protect the said asset.
SlickWilly and ChiHawk liked this.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:13 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
I don't see the need for ZAR and Saad with an extension is worth more then this...would easily keep Saad.

Would take Hallander and a 1st or MAYBE 2nd at the TDL.

That said, Saad is probably a $4.5M x 5 years as an extension and nothing wrong with the Hawks keeping him.

Everything else looks good except the noticeable hole at the #1RW position where saad should be playing....Nylander is no Saad nor ever will be.
SlickWilly liked this.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:14 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: justaBoss
Imo Saad to Pens doesn't work since they don't have the money.

You could get a lot better return for Saad if he's half retained from some other team. Although I don't think there's going to be many, if at all sign-and-trade kind of moves due to the forthcoming expansion draft, as it forces one to protect the said asset.


That's an important part as Saad would have to be protected in the expansion draft if a team makes a trade for him or else why do it?
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:14 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: justaBoss
Imo Saad to Pens doesn't work since they don't have the money.

You could get a lot better return for Saad if he's half retained from some other team. Although I don't think there's going to be many, if at all sign-and-trade kind of moves due to the forthcoming expansion draft, as it forces one to protect the said asset.


other teams I was thinking about were EDM and Boston. Think Boston would work better due to potentially more options for taking cap back to help them out a little bit more. I just used pittsburgh because of the direct comparable but yeah might not work as good there
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:15 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: SlickWilly
I tried my best to mirror the Zucker trade at the deadline, but that makes sense, would someone else fit there instead of ZAR?


dude where are the penguins getting 6 million from for a winger?
Yeah an barely pay their own, they have to move Bjugstad just to make that happen.
They are cap strapped for the next 2 years. Their only saving grace is they will have mostly everybody locked up and get some relief from the expansion draft to make room for Marino's contract. If they don't get relief there....they are screwed.
SlickWilly liked this.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:15 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: ChiHawk
I don't see the need for ZAR and Saad with an extension is worth more then this...would easily keep Saad.

Would take Hallander and a 1st or MAYBE 2nd at the TDL.

That said, Saad is probably a $4.5M x 5 years as an extension and nothing wrong with the Hawks keeping him.

Everything else looks good except the noticeable hole at the #1RW position where saad should be playing....Nylander is no Saad nor ever will be.


Yeah this is the nuclear option of letting the kids play, either they take the steps they need to take or we get a higher draft pick
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:16 p.m.
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,708
Likes: 31,448
Quoting: ChiHawk
That's an important part as Saad would have to be protected in the expansion draft if a team makes a trade for him or else why do it?


By default, acquiring any player with one year deal should only be considered a rental strengthening as of now due to the abnormal situation regarding the ED and salary cap.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:16 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: pharrow
dude where are the penguins getting 6 million from for a winger?
Yeah an barely pay their own, they have to move Bjugstad just to make that happen.
They are cap strapped for the next 2 years. Their only saving grace is they will have mostly everybody locked up and get some relief from the expansion draft to make room for Marino's contract. If they don't get relief there....they are screwed.


gotcha, might edit that to a different team. Thanks for feedback
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:17 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: pharrow
dude where are the penguins getting 6 million from for a winger?
Yeah an barely pay their own, they have to move Bjugstad just to make that happen.
They are cap strapped for the next 2 years. Their only saving grace is they will have mostly everybody locked up and get some relief from the expansion draft to make room for Marino's contract. If they don't get relief there....they are screwed.


Rumors swirling about a flat cap or only $1.5M increase in the next 2 seasons combined. All depends on the players associations negotiations in terms of escrow and revenue shares. Not looking good is the latest.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:18 p.m.
#12
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,708
Likes: 31,448
Quoting: SlickWilly
other teams I was thinking about were EDM and Boston. Think Boston would work better due to potentially more options for taking cap back to help them out a little bit more. I just used pittsburgh because of the direct comparable but yeah might not work as good there


Both of those teams are very cap strapped as well...don't think either can take assets without dumping some to CHI.

Then again I could see both teams moving Moore+2021 1st or Russell+2021 1st for Saad near the deadline...that's assuming these teams are keeping those assets until the next deadline, which is probably held near the next April or something like that.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:18 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: justaBoss
By default, acquiring any player with one year deal should only be considered a rental strengthening as of now due to the abnormal situation regarding the ED and salary cap.


Yeah but he explained with an extension in place prior to the trade....that changes things dramatically.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:22 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,186
Likes: 4,797
If thats all we can get for saad I would rather just keep him. Pens just don't make sense as a landing spot to me because they are cap-strapped. I think value wise we should get more back for saad or extend him. Maybe Hallander and a 2nd that upgrades to a 1st if saad extends. Thats more in the ballpark of what I would be willing to move him for and That models the Tofolli to VAN deal (2nd and a prospect). As mentioned before I think other teams make more sense as trade partners than PIT
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:24 p.m.
#15
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: ChiHawk
Rumors swirling about a flat cap or only $1.5M increase in the next 2 seasons combined. All depends on the players associations negotiations in terms of escrow and revenue shares. Not looking good is the latest.


lot of teams are going to be tight against the cap. And that's if they play, they still haven't hit the ice yet. If they don't. If they have to cancel. that's gonna hurt.

I see a lot of expensive vets getting the door if they aren't taking lower deals. 34+ crowd is about to have an early retirement. Some younger min salary guys gonna get the nod.
Teams just don't have the cap space for the salary inflation they are having. I don't see many other ways for a few teams but to play rookies and try to shed cap.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:26 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: pharrow
lot of teams are going to be tight against the cap. And that's if they play, they still haven't hit the ice yet. If they don't. If they have to cancel. that's gonna hurt.

I see a lot of expensive vets getting the door if they aren't taking lower deals. 34+ crowd is about to have an early retirement. Some younger min salary guys gonna get the nod.
Teams just don't have the cap space for the salary inflation they are having. I don't see many other ways for a few teams but to play rookies and try to shed cap.


Quoting: justaBoss
Both of those teams are very cap strapped as well...don't think either can take assets without dumping some to CHI.

Then again I could see both teams moving Moore+2021 1st or Russell+2021 1st for Saad near the deadline...that's assuming these teams are keeping those assets until the next deadline, which is probably held near the next April or something like that.


Quoting: Wadejos123
If thats all we can get for saad I would rather just keep him. Pens just don't make sense as a landing spot to me because they are cap-strapped. I think value wise we should get more back for saad or extend him. Maybe Hallander and a 2nd that upgrades to a 1st if saad extends. Thats more in the ballpark of what I would be willing to move him for and That models the Tofolli to VAN deal (2nd and a prospect). As mentioned before I think other teams make more sense as trade partners than PIT


I switched it up to Saad to the Isles, who have a little bit more cap space, what do you think.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:27 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: pharrow
lot of teams are going to be tight against the cap. And that's if they play, they still haven't hit the ice yet. If they don't. If they have to cancel. that's gonna hurt.

I see a lot of expensive vets getting the door if they aren't taking lower deals. 34+ crowd is about to have an early retirement. Some younger min salary guys gonna get the nod.
Teams just don't have the cap space for the salary inflation they are having. I don't see many other ways for a few teams but to play rookies and try to shed cap.


At which point they will have to revisit the CBO discussion. They aren't going to screw over the older vets is my guess which is to your point what will happen.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:30 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: ChiHawk
At which point they will have to revisit the CBO discussion. They aren't going to screw over the older vets is my guess which is to your point what will happen.


they don't have to screw them over, just not offer them a contract. Teams can move on. production in the 34+ range ain't great to being with and the league keeps getting younger.
Just going to increase that pace.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:30 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: SlickWilly
I switched it up to Saad to the Isles, who have a little bit more cap space, what do you think.


Please no queefer! Seriously though, he had a good AHL season after the prior was not so good.

No need for Bode...too big of a logjam on LHD as is.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:32 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 18,913
Likes: 9,205
Quoting: pharrow
they don't have to screw them over, just not offer them a contract. Teams can move on. production in the 34+ range ain't great to being with and the league keeps getting younger.
Just going to increase that pace.


Don't think it's just the 34+ crowd...those guys don't get big contracts anyway....think it will have a bigger impact on players in the 29 to 32 age range trying to get a new deal....those guys get screwed. Take Hall for example....going on 29 what is he worth then and how much term? More so Hoffman going on 31, what's he worth and for how long?
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:35 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 1,624
Quoting: SlickWilly
I switched it up to Saad to the Isles, who have a little bit more cap space, what do you think.


Isles have no cap, they need to dump contracts and that is too much for Saad.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:38 p.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: SlickWilly
I switched it up to Saad to the Isles, who have a little bit more cap space, what do you think.


I haven't seen enough of Bellows to know to be honest. He's not played many NHL games. But that looks like a huge ask if he's progressing well. It's basically 2 1sts and a 2nd. I don't think you are going to get that for Saad.
I mean Kessel got a conditional 1st, a 1st prospect, and some pieces parts that at the time were more about cap space.
And he was a 80pt player.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:38 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: Warrior24
Isles have no cap, they need to dump contracts and that is too much for Saad.


I mean, Wilde is pretty blocked off from cracking the top 4 unless Dobson busts, which isnt likely at this point, and Bellows is another reclamation project at this point. But thats a fair point on the cap.
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:39 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2,123
Quoting: ChiHawk
Please no queefer! Seriously though, he had a good AHL season after the prior was not so good.

No need for Bode...too big of a logjam on LHD as is.


We all know stan loves his reclamation projects. And I think Wilde would be a good backup in the case that one of Beaudin or Regula doesnt work out
Jul. 1, 2020 at 7:40 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 1,624
Quoting: SlickWilly
I mean, Wilde is pretty blocked off from cracking the top 4 unless Dobson busts, which isnt likely at this point, and Bellows is another reclamation project at this point. But thats a fair point on the cap.


Bellows is not reclamation, he needed time to develop and looked good this year. He is ready to make the jump full time.

Wilde gets moved to help dump Ladd or Boychuk contracts.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll