SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Spending Every Last Penny and Getting Eichel

Created by: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Team: 2020-21 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 1, 2020
Published: Jul. 1, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,000,000
3$5,000,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
2$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,750,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
2.
TBL
    Future Considerations
    MTL
    1. Gourde, Yanni
    2. 2021 1st round pick (TBL)
    3.
    TOR
    1. 2021 7th round pick (NSH)
    2. 2021 7th round pick (NJD)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the PHI
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the TBL
    2021
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    2022
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$81,500,000$81,500,000$0$500,000$0
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    LW, C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $5,300,000$5,300,000
    LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $4,450,000$4,450,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,650,000$1,650,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $925,000$925,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    RW, C, LW
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $700,000$700,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $700,000$700,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $725,000$725,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $7,875,000$7,875,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    G
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,300,000$1,300,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
    RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,700,000$1,700,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $700,000$700,000
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:19 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2020
    Posts: 2,680
    Likes: 1,448
    Can’t see anyone taking on that contract. Especially for a most likely terrible pick
    Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:20 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2020
    Posts: 1,141
    Likes: 387
    you need a lot more than this to get Eichel
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:20 p.m.
    #3
    CGY
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2015
    Posts: 5,544
    Likes: 2,066
    The issue with zero cap space is if any ELC reaches their bonuses, it carries over and hurts your cap next year
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:22 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 8,370
    Likes: 2,275
    Quoting: ItWasIn
    The issue with zero cap space is if any ELC reaches their bonuses, it carries over and hurts your cap next year


    Let me just say I don't envy Tampa's GM right now.
    CD282 liked this.
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:23 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2020
    Posts: 1,141
    Likes: 387
    Quoting: Howisbergevinstillhere
    Can’t see anyone taking on that contract. Especially for a most likely terrible pick


    who you talking about Gourde?
    KeepUps15 liked this.
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:23 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 8,370
    Likes: 2,275
    Quoting: Howisbergevinstillhere
    Can’t see anyone taking on that contract. Especially for a most likely terrible pick


    No 1st rounder is terrible.
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:24 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 4,928
    Likes: 2,670
    giphy.gif
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:25 p.m.
    #8
    Go Cavs
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 2,391
    Likes: 585
    I have to say,

    At least you started with Point and Cirelli
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:26 p.m.
    #9
    CGY
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2015
    Posts: 5,544
    Likes: 2,066
    Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
    Let me just say I don't envy Tampa's GM right now.


    The issue is they've been giving out full NTC's like candy.

    No issue with Stamkos, Kucherov and Hedman having it, they deserve it.

    The problem is Johnson, Palat, Coburn, Gourde and McDonagh having full NTC's, these are secondary players and you essentially eliminate any market for them as they control their fate.
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:26 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2020
    Posts: 2,680
    Likes: 1,448
    Quoting: VastBluepuppy424
    who you talking about Gourde?


    Yes
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:27 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2020
    Posts: 2,680
    Likes: 1,448
    Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
    No 1st rounder is terrible.


    Terrible in terms of value for that horrible contract
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:33 p.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 4,422
    Likes: 1,457
    Quoting: Howisbergevinstillhere
    Terrible in terms of value for that horrible contract


    gourdes defense is actually pretty good. his offense took a hit this year. his value isn't as low as your talking. i also wouldn't call the pick horrible. if gourde bounces back on offense that contract is a steal
    JTBF81 liked this.
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:39 p.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2020
    Posts: 2,680
    Likes: 1,448
    Quoting: keep_ups12
    gourdes defense is actually pretty good. his offense took a hit this year. his value isn't as low as your talking. i also wouldn't call the pick horrible. if gourde bounces back on offense that contract is a steal


    Low 20’s pick in a supposedly weak draft, for a basically 29 on a 5x5 who one upon a time had 60 pts which was a potential career year. Now yes if it’s true that his defence is good and he can put up 20g 40a than sure it’s a very good deal but can’t see anyone taking that swing, especially not MTL
    Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:41 p.m.
    #14
    NoWah49
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2018
    Posts: 4,865
    Likes: 1,432
    not a horrible deal for Eichel, definitely have seen worse
    Jul. 1, 2020 at 11:55 p.m.
    #15
    V5 ANA and BOG
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 1,886
    Likes: 691
    Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
    No 1st rounder is terrible.


    But is a late 1st worth 5 years of overpaying Gourde? Probably not.
    CD282 liked this.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 12:03 a.m.
    #16
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 8,634
    Likes: 3,931
    Decent trades great work considering situation in Tampa.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 1:08 a.m.
    #17
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 8,370
    Likes: 2,275
    Quoting: NR1203
    But is a late 1st worth 5 years of overpaying Gourde? Probably not.


    Yeah he's being overpaid by 1-1.5M so over 5 years 5M-7.5M.

    Marleau was a 6.25M cap dump and got moved for a 1st.

    I also don't think you can automatically say it's gonna be a late 1st. Look what happened to SJS 1st.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 1:11 a.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 2,500
    Likes: 555
    Most on here just see Gourde's stats and usage for just this year and just assume his contract is terrible. He averages 49 points a year for his career and is just below .6 ppg overall. The final 16 games he was .69 ppg after he was elevated to the 2nd line due to injuries. His great 2 way play plus his offensive capabilities when given the minutes makes his contract hardly overpaid or terrible. His contract also becomes a 23 team m-ntc after 2 more seasons so he can also be moved rather easily before the full 5 year deal is over. Tampa will not be tossing in a 1st round pick to move his contract. Perhaps they retain a little, but this is no Marleau situation. I think Tampa plans to keep him anyway and give him the increased minutes next year unless moving him is the only option to keep the rfa's. While Gourde is valuable, if it means keeping Cirelli, Serg and Cernak, he a expendable.
    KeepUps15 liked this.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 1:32 a.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 2,500
    Likes: 555
    Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
    Yeah he's being overpaid by 1-1.5M so over 5 years 5M-7.5M.

    Marleau was a 6.25M cap dump and got moved for a 1st.

    I also don't think you can automatically say it's gonna be a late 1st. Look what happened to SJS 1st.


    Except he's really not overpaid by 1-1.5...49 points a year and ~.6 ppg for the last 3 years plus great defensive play on a 5.167 million aav is not overpaid by 1 to 1.5 million. Tampa's first will be late in 21. This team is not at the end of their window, and unless Tampa suffers several catastrophic injuries, they will be picking in no earlier than the mid to late 20's.

    As far as the Eichel trade, while having Eichel would be nice, Buffalo wouldn't do it and neither would Tampa. As great of a player as he is, I doubt Tampa would give up their 1C and 2C plus their 2nd or 3rd best dman, for 1 player. This lineup is also missing a couple guys like Stephens, who is most likely Tampa's 3C moving forward. Buffalo would rightfully want an overpay for him, but Tampa's not the team to throw 3 quality guys for 1. Cap wise this is one of the few ways it could work, but I think Tampa would rather spread the money between multiple guys of quality than putting all their chips on one number.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 3:29 a.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 8,370
    Likes: 2,275
    Quoting: JTBF81
    Except he's really not overpaid by 1-1.5...49 points a year and ~.6 ppg for the last 3 years plus great defensive play on a 5.167 million aav is not overpaid by 1 to 1.5 million. Tampa's first will be late in 21. This team is not at the end of their window, and unless Tampa suffers several catastrophic injuries, they will be picking in no earlier than the mid to late 20's.

    As far as the Eichel trade, while having Eichel would be nice, Buffalo wouldn't do it and neither would Tampa. As great of a player as he is, I doubt Tampa would give up their 1C and 2C plus their 2nd or 3rd best dman, for 1 player. This lineup is also missing a couple guys like Stephens, who is most likely Tampa's 3C moving forward. Buffalo would rightfully want an overpay for him, but Tampa's not the team to throw 3 quality guys for 1. Cap wise this is one of the few ways it could work, but I think Tampa would rather spread the money between multiple guys of quality than putting all their chips on one number.


    Make no mistake Gourde and McDonagh both have negative value.

    Gourde was only on pace fo 35 points this season. Sure I think he's better than that but the most recent year plays a pretty huge impact on a player's value and Tampa doesn't really have much of a choice if he says he's willing to waive his NTC. They simply don't have the cap space to wait a year and hope be rebounds before moving him out.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 9:32 a.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 1,737
    Likes: 460
    Yeah Buffalo would take that
    CD282 and Dan10900 liked this.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 9:38 a.m.
    #22
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 2,500
    Likes: 555
    Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
    Make no mistake Gourde and McDonagh both have negative value.

    Gourde was only on pace fo 35 points this season. Sure I think he's better than that but the most recent year plays a pretty huge impact on a player's value and Tampa doesn't really have much of a choice if he says he's willing to waive his NTC. They simply don't have the cap space to wait a year and hope be rebounds before moving him out.


    Neither have negative value, and Tampa is very likely not trying to trade either. They are very likely planning on keeping Gourde and increasing his minutes, so when he very likely becomes a ~50 point player again his trade value will be even better next offseason if he is then asked to waive. This scenario also makes him easier to move to Seattle in a deal to protect certain other Tampa players if that's what Tampa is looking to do. They have plenty of options to free up cap aside from tossing a 1st round pick away with a player of Gourde's caliber for nothing. This sort of thing would be a last resort. Johnson is the far more likely player to be leaving this off season anyway, whether through trade or buy out. There is a path for Gourde to leave this off season, but only if he waives and Brisebois can negotiate a satisfactory deal with said team. Tampa could retain a small amount or add a mid to late pick/lesser prospect to even out a trade, but make no mistake, a 1st is not being added to trade Gourde, McD, or Johnson should they waive.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 10:09 a.m.
    #23
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 33,053
    Likes: 8,999
    Point+Cirelli+McDonagh isn't getting you Jack Eichel, Plus you're still 2 players short with 0 cap. So more moves still need to be made.
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 10:27 a.m.
    #24
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 7,261
    Likes: 2,706
    (Point and Cirelli are both at worst similar to Eichel)
    Jul. 2, 2020 at 9:16 p.m.
    #25
    V5 ANA and BOG
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 1,886
    Likes: 691
    Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
    Yeah he's being overpaid by 1-1.5M so over 5 years 5M-7.5M.

    Marleau was a 6.25M cap dump and got moved for a 1st.

    I also don't think you can automatically say it's gonna be a late 1st. Look what happened to SJS 1st.


    Marleau was for 1 year.. Gourde is for 5.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll