SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Crazy ass team

Created by: Bruinsforlife
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 2, 2020
Published: Jul. 2, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,333,333
1$1,250,000
4$3,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
4$4,000,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2020 5th round pick (VGK)
2.
BOS
  1. Burns, Brent ($2,500,000 retained)
3.
TBL
  1. Ritchie, Nick
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$79,069,222$964,222$1,250,000$2,430,778
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,333,333$3,333,333
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,780,000$2,780,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 2, 2020 at 5:22 p.m.
#1
Breadman likes Bread
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 1,729
Not entirely sold on that D Core
Jul. 2, 2020 at 5:26 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 205
Likes: 63
I can't tell if Burns at 2nd line wing is an accident or you actually want to put him on forward like he has a couple of times in his career
dzmets and Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Jul. 2, 2020 at 5:39 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 4,639
Burns is way better on D at this point in his career! He’s 34/35 and he slowing down a bit but still very capable on d but forward he would wear out to quickly.
Jul. 2, 2020 at 6:13 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 387
Tampa would decline, but Nick Ritchie is a cheap physical player who can score so idk
Jul. 2, 2020 at 6:13 p.m.
#5
MMBzFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 281
That would be a crazy good team.
Jul. 2, 2020 at 6:46 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Just too much retention. You would need to not give us a bunch of meh prospects and swap a good one in
sharks_1999 liked this.
Jul. 2, 2020 at 6:49 p.m.
#7
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Why go for burns when you could get a much better and proven player at forward for that package
Jul. 2, 2020 at 6:59 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Bruins reject both of the Non-Moore trades
Moore isnt getting you a 5th
Jul. 2, 2020 at 7:50 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 978
Likes: 228
Sharks take it if you lower the retention. I would avoid Burns if you're putting him at RW, though I would resign Krug. Avoid Gustafsson.
Jul. 2, 2020 at 7:55 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 1,640
I mean the cost is right, but why is TO aquiring Moore?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll