SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Top 20 Norris Defense

Created by: Teemu_salami
Team: 2019-20 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 7, 2020
Published: Jul. 7, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$999,999,999$93,473,461$0$9,060,000$906,526,538
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$5,200,000$5,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$360,000$360K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 8, 2020 at 3:29 p.m.
#26
Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 368
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Oh, so you don’t think he’s a first pairing now? So he probably shouldn’t belong on this list, right?

I don’t think he has the potential to be first pair on a good team, but i think he’ll be a very high end 2nd pair guy.


I take him over Burns, Letang, and Suter on this list. Agree to disagree, I think he looked like a number 1 or 2 this year. say what you will about the Rangers d core but he looked special
Jul. 8, 2020 at 3:33 p.m.
#27
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: Jambo
I take him over Burns, Letang, and Suter on this list. Agree to disagree, I think he looked like a number 1 or 2 this year. say what you will about the Rangers d core but he looked special


Then why didn’t he play more? I guess the line of thinking i have issue with is putting a guy in the top 20 that you say isn’t a first pair guy yet. He played third pairing minutes on a crap team.
CD282 liked this.
Jul. 8, 2020 at 5:18 p.m.
#28
Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 368
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Then why didn’t he play more? I guess the line of thinking i have issue with is putting a guy in the top 20 that you say isn’t a first pair guy yet. He played third pairing minutes on a crap team.


You can't really say they were the third pair...He averaged 19 minutes a night this season, him and Lindgren started a majority of our games down the stretch....Im saying that it is common consensus, including myself, among people who watched the Rangers play more than just a couple times this season, that Lindgren-Fox was our best and most consistent/reliable D pair, and that Fox was a standout on the blue line for us that was steadily improving as the year went on.

I take him over Burns, Suter, and Letang on this list right now, and probably over some more of those names as the years go on.
Jul. 8, 2020 at 5:29 p.m.
#29
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: Jambo
You can't really say they were the third pair...He averaged 19 minutes a night this season, him and Lindgren started a majority of our games down the stretch....Im saying that it is common consensus, including myself, among people who watched the Rangers play more than just a couple times this season, that Lindgren-Fox was our best and most consistent/reliable D pair, and that Fox was a standout on the blue line for us that was steadily improving as the year went on.

I take him over Burns, Suter, and Letang on this list right now, and probably over some more of those names as the years go on.


I didn’t say he was third pair. I said he played third pair minutes. He did. That is factual. There is no arguing that.
Jul. 8, 2020 at 8:08 p.m.
#30
Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 368
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I didn’t say he was third pair. I said he played third pair minutes. He did. That is factual. There is no arguing that.


It just isn't factual though. He played on our top pair as the Rangers began to win games...meaning he played top pair minutes lol. He might've started the season playing third pairing minutes...that changed massively due to his elite play
Jul. 8, 2020 at 8:13 p.m.
#31
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: Jambo
It just isn't factual though. He played on our top pair as the Rangers began to win games...meaning he played top pair minutes lol. He might've started the season playing third pairing minutes...that changed massively due to his elite play


There were three games all season where he cracked the 23 minute mark. They weren’t exactly recent. If i recall (I may not) it was when there were some injuries. You can look up the game log dude. In the last half dozen games theres a couple 20 minutes, a 21, a 17 in there, an 18 in there.

He isn’t trusted for top pairing minutes. There’s a reason for that. There’s nothing wrong with this. He’s young. There’s just 60 d men ahead of him, and he belongs nowhere near this conversation.
Jul. 8, 2020 at 8:28 p.m.
#32
Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 368
Quoting: Bcarlo25
There were three games all season where he cracked the 23 minute mark. They weren’t exactly recent. If i recall (I may not) it was when there were some injuries. You can look up the game log dude. In the last half dozen games theres a couple 20 minutes, a 21, a 17 in there, an 18 in there.

He isn’t trusted for top pairing minutes. There’s a reason for that. There’s nothing wrong with this. He’s young. There’s just 60 d men ahead of him, and he belongs nowhere near this conversation.


I disagree man, all good
Jul. 8, 2020 at 9:06 p.m.
#33
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,833
Likes: 6,911
Quoting: Jambo
I disagree man, all good


With what? His game logs?
Jul. 9, 2020 at 2:56 p.m.
#34
Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 368
Quoting: Bcarlo25
With what? His game logs?


Disagree with you saying he belongs nowhere near this conversation according to "everyone who watches hockey"

I think you're wrong, we just disagree lol
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll