SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blockbuster with COL and OTT

Created by: GMBB
Team: 2020-21 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 11, 2020
Published: Jul. 11, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Either of these trades close? Who needs to add and where. Canucks team is now worry free for Cap as well as Seattle Expansion. $20.5 Million to sign Petey ($10.5 million roughly) and Hughes ($7-8.5 million?)
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
1$980,000
2$2,500,000
2$2,500,000
2$925,000
2$1,200,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,000,000
5$5,500,000
5$9,000,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2020 1st round pick (VAN)
NJD
  1. 2021 1st round pick (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Balcers, Rūdolfs [RFA Rights]
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (WPG)
3.
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the COL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$73,053,545$1,700,000$4,550,000$8,446,455
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 3
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$980,000$980,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,500,000$5,500,000
G
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 11, 2020 at 4:06 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 1,646
Just dont think it hits the needs for the avs.. top 6 winger is good, but expensive dman we dont need and downgrade at goalie also not a good move for us and when you throw in the first it's not smart..

You're sending us what 13 mill in salary and taking back 5?
coga16, Xqb15 and dca919 liked this.
Jul. 11, 2020 at 4:12 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Pointless trade for Colorado. They end up worse in goal, with another dman they don’t need and an often injured forward. And as @JeffW points out we take on a boat load of salary. Easy pass.
Jul. 11, 2020 at 4:13 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 831
Likes: 88
Edited Jul. 11, 2020 at 4:20 p.m.
Quoting: JeffW
Just dont think it hits the needs for the avs.. top 6 winger is good, but expensive dman we dont need and downgrade at goalie also not a good move for us and when you throw in the first it's not smart..

You're sending us what 13 mill in salary and taking back 5?
Jul. 11, 2020 at 4:17 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 831
Likes: 88
Quoting: Xqb15
Pointless trade for Colorado. They end up worse in goal, with another dman they don’t need and an often injured forward. And as @JeffW points out we take on a boat load of salary. Easy pass.


Quoting: JeffW
Just dont think it hits the needs for the avs.. top 6 winger is good, but expensive dman we dont need and downgrade at goalie also not a good move for us and when you throw in the first it's not smart..

You're sending us what 13 mill in salary and taking back 5?


How about Francouz instead of Grub. Take out the 1st replace with a 2nd?
Jul. 11, 2020 at 4:24 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: GMBB
How about Francouz instead of Grub. Take out the 1st replace with a 2nd?


No bc Myers is pointless with a terrible contract. Avs want nothing to do with that anchor
Xqb15 liked this.
Jul. 11, 2020 at 5:06 p.m.
#6
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 3,562
Likes: 1,592
OTTAWA accepts.
Jul. 11, 2020 at 5:43 p.m.
#7
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
As @coga16 @JeffW and @Xqb15 have pointed out, Myers contract makes this unworkable. We already have one slightly inflated RHD contract in Johnson, and once Makar signs (for around $9m presumably) we'd have around $21m committed to just 3 RHD's which is totally unworkable.

Boeser is a good player, but absolutely not a guy who's worth gutting our cap structure for, especially if we're also downgrading in net and giving up prime futures.
Xqb15 liked this.
Jul. 11, 2020 at 6:01 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 1,646
Quoting: GMBB
How about Francouz instead of Grub. Take out the 1st replace with a 2nd?


So we would be giving up more in salary differential.. as long as Myers is in the deal I dont think it's a workable trade just because the avs dont have really any bad contracts to send the other way.. everyone is either at an amazing or fair rate for their production
Xqb15 and Richard88 liked this.
Jul. 11, 2020 at 7:15 p.m.
#9
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
VAN is not moving Virtanen or Boeser
Jul. 11, 2020 at 9:21 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: GMBB
How about Francouz instead of Grub. Take out the 1st replace with a 2nd?


As coga16 said Meyers is completely not needed.
Richard88 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll