SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff setup

Created by: HatterTParty
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 13, 2020
Published: Jul. 13, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Only big change I have in my lines is on defense. I honestly don’t care if seabrook is healthy. The only way I’d play him is if he proves beyond ANY doubt he can actually keep up with the playoff pace. Otherwise, let’s give koekkoek a chance. I’d say he’s earned it in so far as he’s done everything asked of him. The hawks are playing with house money this year considering they didn’t earn this playoff birth. Take a chance with him.

The top 4 D are pretty standard. The top 6 F are the best we got offensively. That first line should never be separated. The second line to me just runs on chemistry. Say what you will about their defensive liability, but there’s just no great alternative that I see with cat and strome. You take cat and strome away from Kane, they just don’t produce the same way. The third line is a bit of a dark horse for depth scoring hopefully. Caggs provides grit and nylander provides a shot for the line. They shouldn’t be a problem defensively either. The fourth line is pretty self explanatory, shut down straight up.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$81,500,000$67,720,019$0$7,797,500$13,779,981
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$2,475,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,833$775,833 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 14, 2020 at 12:22 a.m.
#26
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
I'm going off of what Scott Powers also said about Dach, he could easily end up being the best or 2nd best in the draft class. Never said Mitchell was going to be better then Boqvist, don't think that's true but he will be damn good 2nd liner.

Lundell is a weaker but very similar player to Dach, Dach is simply better in every department and has much better hands and IQ. Both are big two way defensive minded players but Dach has more offense. Shocked you like Lundell and dislike dach.

Um Toronto has plenty of puck movers and speed on their defense, they just don't have players that play actual defense. 2009/2010 Cup team was not considered fast, it was physical and a possession game, but not one of the fastest teams in the league.


Lundell looks and plays a lot like a Patrice Bergeron. I freakin love Bergeron. Him and Dach share very little in comparison outside of being two way forwards. That’s why I like lundell and not Dach. Lundell is a lot like Bergeron. I love Bergeron. Dach is compared to getzlaf. I DO NOT IN ANY WAY LIKE GETZLAF.

Toronto has Reilly and Barrie as puck movers, maybe dermott. The hawks had Keith, seabrook, oduya, hjalmarsson, leddy, and even rosival on a good night. Not a chance Toronto has the defense to play a possession and speed style. Sandin and maybe liljegren could change that. As for playing actual defense, well, of course they suck at that, lol.

Chicago’s 2010 team, for that time, was very fast. Kinda goes back to what I said earlier about adapting with the speed of the times. Go back to 2010 and find me a team that played faster than Chicago. It isn’t easy.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll