SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Blackhawks lose Crawford

Created by: bsikora78
Published: Jul. 14, 2020 at 10:15 p.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 72/186 (39%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because one of the teams exceeds the 23 player roster limit

Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksChicago Blackhawks

Trade occurred while using LTIR
LTIR Relief: $15,325,000
LTIR Used Prior to Trade: $1,336,667
OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Tomkins, MattWaivers ExemptChicago BlackhawksMinor-$0011-------00
2020 3rd round pick (Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksCHI)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Murray, MattPittsburgh PenguinsNHL-$3,750,000111-------2.870.898
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$13,988,3332445653612
Change-$3,750,0001000-10
Final$10,238,333 (↓)25 (↑)456535 (↓)12000

Logo of the Pittsburgh PenguinsPittsburgh Penguins

Trade occurred while using LTIR
LTIR Relief: $6,000,000
LTIR Used Prior to Trade: $3,316,250
OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Murray, MattPittsburgh PenguinsNHL-$3,750,000111-------2.870.898
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Tomkins, MattWaivers ExemptChicago BlackhawksMinor-$0011-------00
2020 3rd round pick (Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksCHI)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$2,683,7502547673510
Change$3,750,000-100010
Final$6,433,750 (↑)24 (↓)476736 (↑)10000
Jul. 14, 2020 at 11:34 p.m.
#1
reelkena
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
You can't lose Crawford. You can only win not having to have Crawford. Also this is low for Murray's rights.
Remus liked this.
Jul. 15, 2020 at 1:04 a.m.
#2
bsikora78
Thread Starter
Hawks36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
Rights remind you
Jul. 15, 2020 at 1:05 a.m.
#3
bsikora78
Thread Starter
Hawks36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
Quoting: reelkena
You can't lose Crawford. You can only win not having to have Crawford. Also this is low for Murray's rights.


Murray wasn't at all near the level of play that he has shown
Jul. 15, 2020 at 1:06 a.m.
#4
bsikora78
Thread Starter
Hawks36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
Quoting: reelkena
You can't lose Crawford. You can only win not having to have Crawford. Also this is low for Murray's rights.


Most likely I'm throwing a prospect in like Shea
Jul. 15, 2020 at 2:02 a.m.
#5
reelkena
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: bsikora78
Murray wasn't at all near the level of play that he has shown


Murray with a leg amputation > corey "I'm only competent when I had a bunch of stud defense in front of me just like niemi was" crawford.
Remus liked this.
Jul. 15, 2020 at 10:29 a.m.
#6
Yojimbo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Tomkins, 3rd for Murray.

That's just... no.

Murray's value it the same as his RFA compensation value of a "1st + 3rd" (noting that Chicago's 2020 1st is top-10 and a bit too high for the reference). Not some ECHL goalie (literally) and a 3rd.

You need to be more around Boqvist/Nylader/Mitchell and a 3rd. Top-5 "prospect" territory. Which top-5 "prospect" can be worked out, but that value range.
Jul. 15, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
#7
bsikora78
Thread Starter
Hawks36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
Quoting: Yojimbo
Tomkins, 3rd for Murray.

That's just... no.

Murray's value it the same as his RFA compensation value of a "1st + 3rd" (noting that Chicago's 2020 1st is top-10 and a bit too high for the reference). Not some ECHL goalie (literally) and a 3rd.

You need to be more around Boqvist/Nylader/Mitchell and a 3rd. Top-5 "prospect" territory. Which top-5 "prospect" can be worked out, but that value range.


Shea and Sikura
Jul. 15, 2020 at 11:19 a.m.
#8
bsikora78
Thread Starter
Hawks36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
Quoting: Yojimbo
Tomkins, 3rd for Murray.

That's just... no.

Murray's value it the same as his RFA compensation value of a "1st + 3rd" (noting that Chicago's 2020 1st is top-10 and a bit too high for the reference). Not some ECHL goalie (literally) and a 3rd.

You need to be more around Boqvist/Nylader/Mitchell and a 3rd. Top-5 "prospect" territory. Which top-5 "prospect" can be worked out, but that value range.


Nylander I'll give up
Jul. 15, 2020 at 11:22 a.m.
#9
Yojimbo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Quoting: bsikora78
Shea and Sikura


Not for Tomkins, 3rd, plus Sikura and Shea.

As mentioned, Tomkins is no value. Sikura might not be cut out for the NHL game (next to no value), Shea wants to go to free agency (no value)

Top-5 "prospect", not "someone who's name appears somewhere on a piece of paper in the Blawkhawk's offices"... Boqvist/Nylader/Mitchell not Tomkins/Sikura/Shea
Jul. 15, 2020 at 11:23 a.m.
#10
bsikora78
Thread Starter
Hawks36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
Quoting: Yojimbo
Not for Tomkins, 3rd, plus Sikura and Shea.

As mentioned, Tomkins is no value. Sikura might not be cut out for the NHL game (next to no value), Shea wants to go to free agency (no value)

Top-5 "prospect", not "someone who's name appears somewhere on a piece of paper in the Blawkhawk's offices"... Boqvist/Nylader/Mitchell not Tomkins/Sikura/Shea


Bump that to a second
Jul. 15, 2020 at 11:26 a.m.
#11
bsikora78
Thread Starter
Hawks36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
Quoting: Yojimbo
Not for Tomkins, 3rd, plus Sikura and Shea.

As mentioned, Tomkins is no value. Sikura might not be cut out for the NHL game (next to no value), Shea wants to go to free agency (no value)

Top-5 "prospect", not "someone who's name appears somewhere on a piece of paper in the Blawkhawk's offices"... Boqvist/Nylader/Mitchell not Tomkins/Sikura/Shea


Murray for a 2nd, Nylander, Gilbert, and Subban
Jul. 15, 2020 at 11:57 a.m.
#12
Yojimbo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Quoting: bsikora78
Murray for a 2nd, Nylander, Gilbert, and Subban


You went from Tomkins, 3rd to a 2nd, Nylander, Gilbert, and Subban and I've only been replying for an hour...
Jul. 15, 2020 at 12:11 p.m.
#13
bsikora78
Thread Starter
Hawks36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 13
Quoting: Yojimbo
You went from Tomkins, 3rd to a 2nd, Nylander, Gilbert, and Subban and I've only been replying for an hour...


Wont give up Boqvist or Mitchell
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll