SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hmmm

Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 16, 2020
Published: Jul. 16, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$4,750,000
3$2,000,000
4$3,500,000
3$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
2$1,000,000
3$925,000
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$76,904,762$0$5,000,000$4,595,238
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 16, 2020 at 3:54 p.m.
#26
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Pharow
He will probably exactly the kind of players Seattle will want. If they goes on the same path Vegas did they will probably goes for Donskoi or one of Grubauer or Francouz. They will be avoiding long term deal


Why would they specifically avoid long-term deals? If they only pick players with short-term then they will have a lot of players hitting UFA soon after the ED which isn't a good way to maximise value.
Jul. 16, 2020 at 4:09 p.m.
#27
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Richard88
Why would they specifically avoid long-term deals? If they only pick players with short-term then they will have a lot of players hitting UFA soon after the ED which isn't a good way to maximise value.


Vegas didn’t took a players with a contract longer then 2 years. You don’t want to commit to a players long term on a new team like Seattle. If the players fit in well then you extend him just like Vegas have done and if you don’t compete well the first couple years you have some players to move on the market to acquire draft capital en prospect. Trading a guys with one or 2 years deal is a lot easier then try to move a 4-6 years deal.
Jul. 16, 2020 at 4:38 p.m.
#28
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Pharow
Vegas didn’t took a players with a contract longer then 2 years. You don’t want to commit to a players long term on a new team like Seattle. If the players fit in well then you extend him just like Vegas have done and if you don’t compete well the first couple years you have some players to move on the market to acquire draft capital en prospect. Trading a guys with one or 2 years deal is a lot easier then try to move a 4-6 years deal.


Good point. 3 years wouldn't really be long-term deals though. It really depends on the player though I guess. For example I don't think they'd pass on Tyler Johnson just because he has over 2 years term remaining.
Jul. 16, 2020 at 4:49 p.m.
#29
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Richard88
Good point. 3 years wouldn't really be long-term deals though. It really depends on the player though I guess. For example I don't think they'd pass on Tyler Johnson just because he has over 2 years term remaining.


No But there not much team that will exposed a consitent 20+ goal with that much term left. If Tampa left him open i am pretty sure Seattle will select him but he is more likely to be dealt by Tampa and maximize is return. He make a decent salary a 5,5 and have been consistent for most of is career averging around 50 point a year. Some team that desperately need secondary scoring will be chasing him for sure
Jul. 17, 2020 at 1:21 p.m.
#30
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Pharow
No But there not much team that will exposed a consitent 20+ goal with that much term left. If Tampa left him open i am pretty sure Seattle will select him but he is more likely to be dealt by Tampa and maximize is return. He make a decent salary a 5,5 and have been consistent for most of is career averging around 50 point a year. Some team that desperately need secondary scoring will be chasing him for sure


TJ has a full NTC so Tampa can't just deal him. And if they want to move his cap hit then exposing him to Seattle would be prudent.
Jul. 17, 2020 at 1:23 p.m.
#31
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Richard88
TJ has a full NTC so Tampa can't just deal him. And if they want to move his cap hit then exposing him to Seattle would be prudent.


NTC isn’t a NMC there players each year that accept to waive it Johnson would be different then any other players. He would probably summit a short list to Tampa Bay and they would work with that.
Jul. 17, 2020 at 4:38 p.m.
#32
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Pharow
NTC isn’t a NMC there players each year that accept to waive it Johnson would be different then any other players. He would probably summit a short list to Tampa Bay and they would work with that.


The dude literally took a paycut so that he could play on a contender and so that his family could stay in Tampa's sunshine. You really think he's going to waive that NTC to go somewhere else? Fat chance.
Jul. 17, 2020 at 8:27 p.m.
#33
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Richard88
The dude literally took a paycut so that he could play on a contender and so that his family could stay in Tampa's sunshine. You really think he's going to waive that NTC to go somewhere else? Fat chance.


Yes he would probably waive is close to the short list he would gave Tampa Bay. At least he could choose is destination. If Tampa would really be in trouble they can summit him to the waivers and like that he would have the choice or where he would land. Unless a players get a NMC, they are fully aware that they can be ask for a trade. So yes Johnson would probably waive is trade. And Johnson have seen is ice time and responsibility drop in a major way in the past 3 season, he could probably be use in a more effective way elsewhere, get more Powerplay time. Players like Johnson have pride, they want to win but they also want to be a big part of it and he isn’t a go to guy anymore in Tampa. Is ice time have drop from 18 minutes to 14 in a 4 years spend that huge for a players who need powerplay time to produced offensively.
Jul. 18, 2020 at 12:38 p.m.
#34
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Pharow
Yes he would probably waive is close to the short list he would gave Tampa Bay. At least he could choose is destination. If Tampa would really be in trouble they can summit him to the waivers and like that he would have the choice or where he would land. Unless a players get a NMC, they are fully aware that they can be ask for a trade. So yes Johnson would probably waive is trade. And Johnson have seen is ice time and responsibility drop in a major way in the past 3 season, he could probably be use in a more effective way elsewhere, get more Powerplay time. Players like Johnson have pride, they want to win but they also want to be a big part of it and he isn’t a go to guy anymore in Tampa. Is ice time have drop from 18 minutes to 14 in a 4 years spend that huge for a players who need powerplay time to produced offensively.


Players like Johnson, or should I say people like Johnson, have a family, so hockey will come after family. And I doubt he and his wife are going to want to uproot their lives in the middle of a messed up year just to appease GM Brisbois.
Jul. 18, 2020 at 8:49 p.m.
#35
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: Richard88
Players like Johnson, or should I say people like Johnson, have a family, so hockey will come after family. And I doubt he and his wife are going to want to uproot their lives in the middle of a messed up year just to appease GM Brisbois.

You don’t quite realize that if Tamapa would absolutely need to move out salary they can put him on the waivers and Johnson would have absolutely nothing to do against it. I doubt that is wife will choose syracuse over any other Nhl city. If Julien Brisebois come to Johnson and told him he must make room on the cao and he need to be move Johnson will summit a mist of team. At least if he accept to be moved he will have the luxury to choose is destination. A Ntc have not much impact but limit the trade destination.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll