SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tatar for Graves and Jost

Created by: Richard88
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 20, 2020
Published: Jul. 20, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,850,000
2$2,250,000
1$875,000
1$3,200,000
Trades
1.
COL
  1. Tatar, Tomas
Additional Details:
Extended $5.25m x 5 years.
MTL
  1. Graves, Ryan [RFA Rights]
  2. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
2.
COL
  1. 2021 4th round pick (ARI)
ARI
  1. Kamenev, Vladislav [RFA Rights]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$76,993,095$0$5,425,000$4,506,905
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,850,000$4,850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$875,000$875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$150,000$150K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 20, 2020 at 12:46 p.m.
#1
NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 1,106
As someone who's a fan of a team with Adam Pelech, you don't want to trade Ryan Graves.
hanson493 liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 12:57 p.m.
#2
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
i'd rather go after someone younger like danault or someone with some grit like gallagher.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 1:00 p.m.
#3
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
Quoting: DirtyDangle
i'd rather go after someone younger like danault or someone with some grit like gallagher.


Calvert and Kadri say hey
Jul. 20, 2020 at 1:09 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 538
Quoting: DirtyDangle
i'd rather go after someone younger like danault or someone with some grit like gallagher.


they would cost a lot more
RobbStark03 liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 1:12 p.m.
#5
Best gm
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 997
Likes: 303
Graves is not enough. I don’t value Jost much so he doesn’t add value to the trade in my books.
RobbStark03 liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 1:13 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: slapshot723
As someone who's a fan of a team with Adam Pelech, you don't want to trade Ryan Graves.


I agree. In a previous Montreal AGM by Campabee which I did a Colorado AGM for a trade for Tatar was proposed involving 2021 COL 1st + 2021 COL 3rd + Beaucage, and I think that would be much more appealing for Colorado than trading Graves. That said, I thought it would be interesting to gauge interest and value here.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 1:13 p.m.
#7
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: BigOaf69
they would cost a lot more


well it's already an overpayment for tatar so i don't mind adding something to it if it meant gallagher or danault
Jul. 20, 2020 at 1:29 p.m.
#8
Habs fan somehow
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 312
Likes: 80
MTL doesn't need Graves, or any other non-top pairing LHD. Furthermore, they need quality, not quantity. Trading Tatar for 2 lesser talents doesn't help.
RobbStark03 liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 1:41 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 7,115
Quoting: DirtyDangle
well it's already an overpayment for tatar so i don't mind adding something to it if it meant gallagher or danault


Over the past 2 seasons, he has a 0.8 ppg -- 58 in 80 and then 61 in 68 this season. How is a one-year defenseman and an underachieving 3rd liner an overpayment? You're overvaluing Colorado's players. And the contract offer is low.
RobbStark03 and CLR liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: gm_jeanguy
MTL doesn't need Graves, or any other non-top pairing LHD. Furthermore, they need quality, not quantity. Trading Tatar for 2 lesser talents doesn't help.


Montreal are going to find it impossible to acquire a top pairing LHD via trade. Even young top 4 D's are difficult to acquire. Graves is probably as close as Montreal can get to a young top pair LHD.
DirtyDangle liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 2:21 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 556
Quoting: Richard88
Montreal are going to find it impossible to acquire a top pairing LHD via trade. Even young top 4 D's are difficult to acquire. Graves is probably as close as Montreal can get to a young top pair LHD.


Then Montreal doesn't make the trade. They shouldn't settle on a player that doesn't upgrade the roster.
villenash and gm_jeanguy liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 2:58 p.m.
#12
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
Quoting: villenash
Over the past 2 seasons, he has a 0.8 ppg -- 58 in 80 and then 61 in 68 this season. How is a one-year defenseman and an underachieving 3rd liner an overpayment? You're overvaluing Colorado's players. And the contract offer is low.


sounds more like you undervaluing graves and jost.
Richard88 liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 3:08 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Meh I like Beaucage 1st and a 3rd a lot more.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 3:13 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 7,115
Quoting: DirtyDangle
sounds more like you undervaluing graves and jost.


If Graves puts up a similar season next year, then he will have much more trade value than he does now. He definitely played well this year, but teams aren't going to give up a player like Tatar for him.

Jost has been in the NHL consistently for the past 3 years now. His ice time has decreased in all 3 seasons, he doesn't have great underlying numbers, and he doesn't put up many points. He was also drafted as a center and is awful in the faceoff circle -- so he's a winger at this point. He also doesn't play the penalty kill. He does get around 2 minutes of PP time per game over the past 3 seasons, but he still doesn't produce. The only thing going for him right now is his age - 22. He's still young and he could turn it around, but I don't see any team giving up a lot to get him. He would be a great buy-low candidate, but would the Avs even want to give him up for a low-ball offer -- probably not. So I don't see him being traded anyway.

Tatar was previously traded for a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, to VGK from DET -- which was an overpay at the time, but he has since put up his best offensive numbers to date. The trade proposed by OP is weaker than a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Jost + Graves for Tatar just isn't fair value in my opinion.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 4:57 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: villenash
If Graves puts up a similar season next year, then he will have much more trade value than he does now. He definitely played well this year, but teams aren't going to give up a player like Tatar for him.

Jost has been in the NHL consistently for the past 3 years now. His ice time has decreased in all 3 seasons, he doesn't have great underlying numbers, and he doesn't put up many points. He was also drafted as a center and is awful in the faceoff circle -- so he's a winger at this point. He also doesn't play the penalty kill. He does get around 2 minutes of PP time per game over the past 3 seasons, but he still doesn't produce. The only thing going for him right now is his age - 22. He's still young and he could turn it around, but I don't see any team giving up a lot to get him. He would be a great buy-low candidate, but would the Avs even want to give him up for a low-ball offer -- probably not. So I don't see him being traded anyway.

Tatar was previously traded for a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, to VGK from DET -- which was an overpay at the time, but he has since put up his best offensive numbers to date. The trade proposed by OP is weaker than a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Jost + Graves for Tatar just isn't fair value in my opinion.


I agree that Graves will probably have more value next year, which is why I think it would be better for Colorado to hold onto him at least one more year. That also allows Byram the opportunity to settle before we push him into the top 4.

Jost has shown improvement in CF% and FF% this season, as well as flashes of offense when given the opportunity (eg. 7 points in his last 9 games prior to the lockdowns). He's also at an age where many top 6 forwards enter the league, yet he already has 3 seasons under his belt. At the very least a team would get a solid defensive 3rd liner, and at a cheap caphit that has some good value. He was also eased onto the PK late in the season and did well in the role. The only reason why he doesn't get more PK time is because Colorado have an embarrassment of good defensive forwards who are more experienced than Jost in that role, but there's no reason why Jost can't be an effective PKer. In fact I'd be surprised if he doesn't become a regular PKer at some stage given how reliable he is with the puck and on the forecheck (as evidenced by his 71:31 takaway to giveaway ratio).

As for Tatar, just because Vegas overpaid massively for him doesn't mean that that was his value at the time. Nor does it mean that a similar package this time around would be an underpayment. A 1st + 2nd + 3rd would be good value for a player like him. Also bear in mind that on most contenders he wouldn't be a 1st line winger or get PP1 time (certainly not on the Avs), nor was he a 1st line winger prior to his 2 seasons with Montreal, so that has to be taken into consideration when considering his offensive output.
villenash liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 5:06 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
graves is playing top pair with makar, so im not sure how that doesnt make graves top pair? maybe he isnt a top 32 dman but no chance a team sells a top pairing dman for anything less than the moon. This is supreme overpayment when you consider cost/age/chemistry etc. I like tatar but you dont pay for the ufa rights without a contract in place and as a ufa tatar would be better suited to get more $$ in FA. or he can dictate where he goes etc. Maybe he doesnt want to play with kadri? maybe he doesnt want to play in colorado? who knows.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 5:07 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 7,115
Quoting: Richard88
I agree that Graves will probably have more value next year, which is why I think it would be better for Colorado to hold onto him at least one more year. That also allows Byram the opportunity to settle before we push him into the top 4.

Jost has shown improvement in CF% and FF% this season, as well as flashes of offense when given the opportunity (eg. 7 points in his last 9 games prior to the lockdowns). He's also at an age where many top 6 forwards enter the league, yet he already has 3 seasons under his belt. At the very least a team would get a solid defensive 3rd liner, and at a cheap caphit that has some good value. He was also eased onto the PK late in the season and did well in the role. The only reason why he doesn't get more PK time is because Colorado have an embarrassment of good defensive forwards who are more experienced than Jost in that role, but there's no reason why Jost can't be an effective PKer. In fact I'd be surprised if he doesn't become a regular PKer at some stage given how reliable he is with the puck and on the forecheck (as evidenced by his 71:31 takaway to giveaway ratio).

As for Tatar, just because Vegas overpaid massively for him doesn't mean that that was his value at the time. Nor does it mean that a similar package this time around would be an underpayment. A 1st + 2nd + 3rd would be good value for a player like him. Also bear in mind that on most contenders he wouldn't be a 1st line winger or get PP1 time (certainly not on the Avs), nor was he a 1st line winger prior to his 2 seasons with Montreal, so that has to be taken into consideration when considering his offensive output.


I agree with basically everything you're saying. I think the trade is ultimately a year too early -- if Jost and Graves improve next season, it would make more sense that MTL would consider a deal like this then maybe (disregard Tatar's contract).

One thing I just realized when looking at Tatar's stats -- he's a 20+ goal scorer in each of the past 6 seasons. Pretty impressive stuff for a guy that doesn't get talked about much.
Richard88 liked this.
Jul. 20, 2020 at 11:58 p.m.
#18
Nick
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 822
MTL rejects.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 5:49 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: DriveFor25
MTL rejects.


Why?
Jul. 21, 2020 at 8:39 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 556
Quoting: Richard88
Why?


Because it doesn't upgrade the Montreal roster at all.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll