SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The illusive top 6 forward

Created by: ArakinSkywalker
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 22, 2020
Published: Jul. 22, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I don't think we want to spend all our cap in the offseason on a long bloated contract from free agency. I think we've drafted and developed our players enough right now that we can comfortably trade a 1st and move a prospect&roster player.
I also think Sakic will sign a depth Dman to serve as the 7th man just as Barbs did this year if Bryam isn't ready for full time duties.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,750,000
2$2,250,000
2$2,250,000
1$800,000
1$700,000
1$925,000
2$3,500,000
1$740,000
2$2,250,000
2$740,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Defense, Depth
1$800,000
Trades
ANA
  1. Bowers, Shane
  2. Zadorov, Nikita
  3. 2021 1st round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
I don't really know what the asking price would be if this is enough or not. I assume a first a prospect is a must then a roster player, i don't know if zads is the one they want or not.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$76,387,067$0$2,925,000$5,112,933
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,250,000$2,250,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$800,000$800,000
C
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 3
Defense, Depth
$800,000$800,000

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 22, 2020 at 4:47 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,246
Likes: 7,114
If Rakell is available, I think this is a better route to go as opposed to the Hall signings I see in some Avs posts. I think that is a perfectly acceptable offer as well, bordering on an overpay even maybe.
ArakinSkywalker liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 4:49 p.m.
#2
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
If Zadorov was a RHD I’d say it’s perfect but he’s not. They would probably want Timmins instead
Jul. 22, 2020 at 4:50 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Dr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,500
Likes: 1,434
Quoting: villenash
If Rakell is available, I think this is a better route to go as opposed to the Hall signings I see in some Avs posts. I think that is a perfectly acceptable offer as well, bordering on an overpay even maybe.


I agree, we're gonna need money for raises soon and any kind of deadline deal if something isn't working. But i think it will be a high asking price for Rakell because of that contract he's on. Ideally you're looking at around 50-60 points for 3.7 which is a pretty sweet deal
villenash liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 4:56 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Dr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,500
Likes: 1,434
Quoting: AndrewLadd
If Zadorov was a RHD I’d say it’s perfect but he’s not. They would probably want Timmins instead


Yeah i could see people not wanting Zads, i've pointed out his flaws in a few posts, he's a major wildcard as to what kind of player you're getting
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:11 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 1,070
Quoting: AndrewLadd
If Zadorov was a RHD I’d say it’s perfect but he’s not. They would probably want Timmins instead


If it's Timmins over Zadorov, then I feel like you have to downgrade the 1st to a 2nd. It'd suck to lose him, but I'd do it for Rakell
ArakinSkywalker and AndrewLadd liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:14 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Dr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,500
Likes: 1,434
Quoting: Foppa21
If it's Timmins over Zadorov, then I feel like you have to downgrade the 1st to a 2nd. It'd suck to lose him, but I'd do it for Rakell


Yeah it's one of those you gotta give something good to get something good. It's a possibility to move jost + for a future top4 RHD if we moved timmins as well
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:15 p.m.
#7
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: AndrewLadd
If Zadorov was a RHD I’d say it’s perfect but he’s not. They would probably want Timmins instead


Fair but the problem is that Timmins is off the table.

Avs protect 3 D at expansion: Johnson (NMC), Makar and Girard - meaning they already have come to terms with losing Zadorov and/or Graves (so why not move them while you can). Because of the loss of Graves and/or Zadorov, COL NEEDS to hold onto Timmins to fill those holes.

Honestly, given that Timmins is an NHL ready RHD with tons of upside, I wouldnt move him for Rakell 1 for 1. Young and talented RHD are gems, quality middle 6 F are dime a dozen (especially when you’ve got cap space to get one in FA)
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:25 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Foppa21
If it's Timmins over Zadorov, then I feel like you have to downgrade the 1st to a 2nd. It'd suck to lose him, but I'd do it for Rakell


I'd prefer (as the Ducks) to replace Zad with Timmins and just take out Bowers tbh
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:30 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 1,070
Quoting: McRanteskog
Fair but the problem is that Timmins is off the table.

Avs protect 3 D at expansion: Johnson (NMC), Makar and Girard - meaning they already have come to terms with losing Zadorov and/or Graves (so why not move them while you can). Because of the loss of Graves and/or Zadorov, COL NEEDS to hold onto Timmins to fill those holes.

Honestly, given that Timmins is an NHL ready RHD with tons of upside, I wouldnt move him for Rakell 1 for 1. Young and talented RHD are gems, quality middle 6 F are dime a dozen (especially when you’ve got cap space to get one in FA)


You're not wrong, but you also only have Mack at his steal of a deal for three more years. Gotta go for it in the window and plan for the aftermath. The man's gonna be paid upwards of $15 million depending on the fall out from all this covid nonsense.

I'm not saying we should just be throwing young dmen out the door, especially Timmins because he'd likely be top-4 on a good 10-15 other teams, but if we're going after a top-6 winger we're going to have to give up something we don't want to. On the one hand, you envy the hell out of Sakic's situation, but on the other? It's a tough one. One wrong move and it sets you up for failure down the road. If he plays his cards right though? Dynasty potential.
McRanteskog liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:36 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 1,070
Quoting: Dan10900
I'd prefer (as the Ducks) to replace Zad with Timmins and just take out Bowers tbh


I think that Joe and Bednar (who loves Bowers) would love that haha
Dan10900 liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:40 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Foppa21
I think that Joe and Bednar (who loves Bowers) would love that haha


I like Bowers, but I like RHD more, and don't think Bowers will be a huge upgrade over Steel/Terry/Comtois/BoG/Heinen/Lundestrom etc in the middle 6 (long term)
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:40 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
It's an overpay for Rakell but GMBM might require that from Colorado.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:42 p.m.
#13
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Dan10900
I'd prefer (as the Ducks) to replace Zad with Timmins and just take out Bowers tbh


Yeah from Anaheim's perspective Timmins+ is the return that makes sense since they're stocked with LHD's. But Sakic won't trade Timmins because he's way too important to this team's short and long-term future.
ArakinSkywalker and Foppa21 liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:43 p.m.
#14
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Foppa21
I think that Joe and Bednar (who loves Bowers) would love that haha


Nah, Timmins is rated extremely highly by Sakic and Bednar, they'd much sooner move Bowers than Timmins, even if they like Bowers too.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:44 p.m.
#15
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: crankshaft
It's an overpay for Rakell but GMBM might require that from Colorado.


I'd be fine with that trade. It gets Colorado Rakell without giving up any of our 2020 1st or any of our top 4 prospects (Byram, Newhook, Timmins, Kaut).
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:44 p.m.
#16
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,658
Cost is a RHD late 1st / early 2nd and 2nd-3rd line winger
crankshaft liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:46 p.m.
#17
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Foppa21
You're not wrong, but you also only have Mack at his steal of a deal for three more years. Gotta go for it in the window and plan for the aftermath. The man's gonna be paid upwards of $15 million depending on the fall out from all this covid nonsense.

I'm not saying we should just be throwing young dmen out the door, especially Timmins because he'd likely be top-4 on a good 10-15 other teams, but if we're going after a top-6 winger we're going to have to give up something we don't want to. On the one hand, you envy the hell out of Sakic's situation, but on the other? It's a tough one. One wrong move and it sets you up for failure down the road. If he plays his cards right though? Dynasty potential.


Timmins isn't just one for the future. He's going to be making an impact with this team as soon as this years playoffs, as well as between 2020-2023 during the teams prime cup window. What's especially true is that he's going to be on an ELC and cheap bridge deal for those years too, while playing at a top 4 level.
ArakinSkywalker and Foppa21 liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:48 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
Cost is a RHD late 1st / early 2nd and 2nd-3rd line winger


He had those two 30 goal seasons, is there a reason for the decrease in goals this and last year? Injury related or new linemates? He's only 27 so he could net 30 again but I'd like to see him do it consistently before sending a middle six winger, RHD and a 1st...Just curious if he still has that ability, not an insult or anything.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:48 p.m.
#19
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
Cost is a RHD late 1st / early 2nd and 2nd-3rd line winger


How about Helleson + COL 2021 1st + Donskoi/Compher/Jost?
ArakinSkywalker liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:50 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 3,440
Rakell will cost more than he's worth in this market because of the low cap hit. Colorado doesn't have a cap problem and still won't even after raises. It makes a lot more sense to me that the team goes after a UFA and keeps their assets (especially Timmins).

I do like the idea of him on the team, but I can't get past the cost. He'll want a fat raise after his current contract too, so it's likely the team ends up in worse shape than if they sign a guy like Toffoli.
Xqb15 liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:52 p.m.
#21
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,658
Quoting: Richard88
How about Helleson + COL 2021 1st + Donskoi/Compher/Jost?


Helleson, Donskoi, and 2021 would work
ArakinSkywalker and Richard88 liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:59 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Dr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,500
Likes: 1,434
Quoting: SuckMyAvs
Rakell will cost more than he's worth in this market because of the low cap hit. Colorado doesn't have a cap problem and still won't even after raises. It makes a lot more sense to me that the team goes after a UFA and keeps their assets (especially Timmins).

I do like the idea of him on the team, but I can't get past the cost. He'll want a fat raise after his current contract too, so it's likely the team ends up in worse shape than if they sign a guy like Toffoli.


Well i think you'd let him walk after 2 years if you don't win 1 cup over those 2 seasons, and hopefully at that time Kaut is ready to make the jump to top 6 minutes. But i think the main thing is going after the cup, i don't want to move timmins, and if thats the cost there's other rental options(gallagher, Tatar, Anderson maybe) but a 1st and a prospect like bowers is an easy trade for a prime top 6 when you're in your win now window.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 5:59 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 1,070
Quoting: Richard88
Nah, Timmins is rated extremely highly by Sakic and Bednar, they'd much sooner move Bowers than Timmins, even if they like Bowers too.


O no doubt, I was just saying that not including Bowers in a deal that involved Timmins would suit the Avs. Not saying they'd move Timmins over Bowers
Richard88 liked this.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 6:37 p.m.
#24
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: SuckMyAvs
Rakell will cost more than he's worth in this market because of the low cap hit. Colorado doesn't have a cap problem and still won't even after raises. It makes a lot more sense to me that the team goes after a UFA and keeps their assets (especially Timmins).

I do like the idea of him on the team, but I can't get past the cost. He'll want a fat raise after his current contract too, so it's likely the team ends up in worse shape than if they sign a guy like Toffoli.


I agree that it would be better to sign an UFA and keep our assets, but I'm not sure I agree with the part in bold.

In 2022 we have Kadri hitting UFA and only Bowers and Francouz to resign, with the cap likely going up slightly in 2022/23 (projected $1m increase), so we could probably resign Rakell at a reasonable caphit, unless of course he's asking for ridiculous money.

In the event that he doesn't resign, we'd have his cap space, plus Kadri's $4.5m to use to acquire someone in UFA or via trade at that stage and set us up for another cup push in the last 2 years of Newhook's ELC.

Being in the position of being a cup contender and having capspace in 2022 could be a really strong position to be in - just as it will be this offseason. And that advantage could be even more pronounced after 2 years of a flat cap. Signing an UFA in 2022 before the cap rises significantly again from 2023 onwards could be really nice timing to sign a contract with some free agents.
Jul. 22, 2020 at 6:44 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 3,440
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
Well i think you'd let him walk after 2 years if you don't win 1 cup over those 2 seasons, and hopefully at that time Kaut is ready to make the jump to top 6 minutes. But i think the main thing is going after the cup, i don't want to move timmins, and if thats the cost there's other rental options(gallagher, Tatar, Anderson maybe) but a 1st and a prospect like bowers is an easy trade for a prime top 6 when you're in your win now window.


I wouldn't let him walk. Pretty sure the team would be able to keep him. Even so, it's just not my favorite option due to what I think the cost would be. The Helleson, Donskoi, 2021 pick would be fine, and your proposal would be too, but I'm not sure either gets it done. Timmins is a no go.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll