SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Yes or no

Created by: ZiggyPalffy
Team: 2020-21 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 23, 2020
Published: Jul. 23, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
LAK
    Rights to Vasily Podkolzin.
    Buyouts
    Recapture Fees
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the ANA
    2021
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2022
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    18$81,500,000$66,540,211$1,700,000$4,550,000$14,959,789
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,125,000$4,125,000
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,875,000$5,875,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,375,000$4,375,000
    RW, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $925,000$925,000
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $863,333$863,333
    C, LW, RW
    RFA - 3
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,050,000$1,050,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 4:06 a.m.
    #1
    Hockee
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2020
    Posts: 2,775
    Likes: 868
    Uh. No
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 4:09 a.m.
    #2
    StevieY19!!
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 1,067
    Likes: 689
    Big no from VAN those two players aren't nearly as valuable as Pod
    remowilliams liked this.
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 4:27 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 14,042
    Likes: 5,158
    Quoting: AnyoneButTheBruins
    Big no from VAN those two players aren't nearly as valuable as Pod


    This is an annoying comment
    I won’t say anything bad I’ll get a warning but say something constructive like why etc. He’s sending one A- and B+ prospect for an A+ prospect, not bad IMO
    ZiggyPalffy and OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 4:35 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 9,721
    Likes: 2,805
    Quoting: GMs
    This is an annoying comment
    I won’t say anything bad I’ll get a warning but say something constructive like why etc. He’s sending one A- and B+ prospect for an A+ prospect, not bad IMO


    I usually don't respond to the ones that don't sound intelligent and don't elaborate.

    I appreciate the feedback. I thought it was a pretty good idea, but that's just me.
    GMs and OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 5:00 a.m.
    #5
    2018 Canucks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 2,172
    Likes: 747
    2 ways to look at this deal.

    Going back it’s a later 1st & a 3rd for a top 10 1st that wouldn’t be accepted on the draft floor.

    Fast forward Kupari isn’t looking to be top 6 as of yet or maybe not at all & Madden a 3C maybe 2C if he excels a big IF. Therefore neither would be a fit as the roster stands or with other prospects in the pipeline.

    So a no
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 5:03 a.m.
    #6
    StevieY19!!
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 1,067
    Likes: 689
    Quoting: GMs
    This is an annoying comment
    I won’t say anything bad I’ll get a warning but say something constructive like why etc. He’s sending one A- and B+ prospect for an A+ prospect, not bad IMO


    Quoting: Bf3351
    I usually don't respond to the ones that don't sound intelligent and don't elaborate.

    I appreciate the feedback. I thought it was a pretty good idea, but that's just me.


    Alright let's say for instance would you trade the 10th overall pick for the 20th overall pick and a 3rd? I wouldn't. Now would you trade that 10th overall that has developed handsomely for one player that has developed at par of where he was drafted and B prospect. No again IMO. Also, I get what you are saying about the comment above, but it is late at night so I felt lazy with that comment and I do apologize. I normally do like to put in some actual feedback.
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 5:04 a.m.
    #7
    StevieY19!!
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 1,067
    Likes: 689
    Quoting: Nighthawk
    2 ways to look at this deal.

    Going back it’s a later 1st & a 3rd for a top 10 1st that wouldn’t be accepted on the draft floor.

    Fast forward Kupari isn’t looking to be top 6 as of yet or maybe not at all & Madden a 3C maybe 2C if he excels a big IF. Therefore neither would be a fit as the roster stands or with other prospects in the pipeline.

    So a no


    Pretty odd we both said essentially the same thing at the same time...
    remowilliams liked this.
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 6:08 a.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 14,042
    Likes: 5,158
    Quoting: AnyoneButTheBruins
    Alright let's say for instance would you trade the 10th overall pick for the 20th overall pick and a 3rd? I wouldn't. Now would you trade that 10th overall that has developed handsomely for one player that has developed at par of where he was drafted and B prospect. No again IMO. Also, I get what you are saying about the comment above, but it is late at night so I felt lazy with that comment and I do apologize. I normally do like to put in some actual feedback.


    Madden turned out better than expected, Kupari is still a question mark. The answer is no, of course, but it’s not THAT bad
    Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:35 p.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 9,721
    Likes: 2,805
    Quoting: GMs
    Madden turned out better than expected, Kupari is still a question mark. The answer is no, of course, but it’s not THAT bad


    People say Madden was the best player in the NCAA this year.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll