SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would he sign it and can they match

Created by: Anus_McLeod
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 21, 2020
Published: Jul. 23, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I kinda love this one. The team adds to the core with Cirelli and gets some picks back by moving Compher, Donskoi, and Zadorov. Two firsts in this draft would be better than one in each of 2020 and 2021, so that's a win too. Sign me up for Lapierre and O'Rourke.

The expansion draft gets a little weird, as the team basically needs to let Kadri go. They have already replaced him with Cirelli though, so it's not the biggest deal. Newhook either goes directly to 2C or Cirelli (maybe even Jost if he breaks out) moves up and Newhook starts on the third line. Either way is fine, and I love the options.

The team still has a couple million in cap space after raises to Landeskog, Makar, and Grubauer and can use it on an extension for Calvert if they want. Or it just allows for some breathing room going forward.

Lines in future seasons look something like this:

Landeskog, MacKinnon, Rantanen
Toffoli, Newhook, Burakovsky
Jost, Cirelli, Nichushkin
Calvert, Bowers, Kaut

Graves, Makar
Girard, Timmins
Byram, Johnson

Cap looks like this:

MacKinnon 6,300,000
Landeskog 7,250,000
Rantanen 9,250,000
Newhook 925,000
Toffoli 5,000,000
Burakovsky 4,850,000
Cirelli 5,500,000
Jost 1,800,000
Nichushkin 2,250,000
Bowers 925,000
Calvert 2,500,000
Kaut 894,167
Graves 2,850,000
Makar 9,000,000
Girard 5,000,000
Timmins 1,400,000
Byram 925,000
Johnson 6,000,000
Grubauer 4,850,000
Francouz 2,000,000
Scratches 1,600,000
Total 81,069,167

Only Bowers will need a raise before the flat cap era ends, and I doubt that will be crushing. Maybe Calvert only gets one more year to give flexibility.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$5,500,000
3$1,500,000
3$2,250,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
4$4,850,000
4$2,850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Lapierre, Hendrix
3$900,000
ORourke, Ryan
3$900,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Cirelli, Anthony$7,700,000
2021 1st round pick
2021 2nd round pick
2021 3rd round pick
Trades
1.
COL
  1. 2020 1st round pick (VAN)
NJD
  1. Compher, J.T.
  2. Zadorov, Nikita [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (TOR)
2.
COL
  1. 2020 4th round pick (BUF)
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (BUF)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the COL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$76,166,428$0$2,925,000$5,333,572

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,850,000$4,850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$742,500$742,500
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 23, 2020 at 11:59 a.m.
#1
Go Sharks Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 656
you should definitely be able to have him for that price
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:05 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Why though? We already have Kadri as the 2C with Newhook primed to take that spot once Kadri's contract expires. A 2nd line winger would be a much better target imo
McRanteskog liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:09 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,440
Quoting: moli92
Why though? We already have Kadri as the 2C with Newhook primed to take that spot once Kadri's contract expires. A 2nd line winger would be a much better target imo


Because you get a 23 year old perennial Selke candidate. Kadri is about to turn 30.

I also signed Toffoli, so they do both. Basically they still sign a wing and get 7 years younger at 2/3C.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:10 p.m.
#4
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: moli92
Why though? We already have Kadri as the 2C with Newhook primed to take that spot once Kadri's contract expires. A 2nd line winger would be a much better target imo


^ This.
COL are already primed for a smooth transition at C with Kadri here now until Newhook is ready to take over (with Bowers falling in behind Newhook hopefully). COL needs a 2nd line winger which they can get at free agency without forfeiting a 1st + 2nd + 3rd picks
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:10 p.m.
#5
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
I don't think NJ would give up a mid-1st in a deep draft for secondary pieces like Compher/Zadorov/3rd.

I think Tampa would easily match a $5.5m AAV OS, and they'd also thank you for saving them the trouble of negotiating with Cirelli on their behalf.

I'm not overly keen on Lapierre btw. He has great vision, but something about him just seems soft. Maybe it's the fact that he's just so damn scared to shoot the puck. He gives me Kerfoot vibes, so I'd pass on him. There's better alternatives at that pick in the draft who also don't have the health risks.
DevilsFanInTX and OldNYIfan liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:12 p.m.
#6
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: SuckMyAvs
Because you get a 23 year old perennial Selke candidate. Kadri is about to turn 30.

I also signed Toffoli, so they do both. Basically they still sign a wing and get 7 years younger at 2/3C.


Perennial Selke?? My friend, Cirelli has only played 168 NHL games... on a loaded TBL team. Thats two seasons.. calm your expectations a little
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:13 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 448
Quoting: Richard88
I don't think NJ would give up a mid-1st in a deep draft for secondary pieces like Compher/Zadorov/3rd.

I think Tampa would easily match a $5.5m AAV OS, and they'd also thank you for saving them the trouble of negotiating with Cirelli on their behalf.

I'm not overly keen on Lapierre btw. He has great vision, but something about him just seems soft. Maybe it's the fact that he's just so damn scared to shoot the puck. He gives me Kerfoot vibes, so I'd pass on him. There's better alternatives at that pick in the draft who also don't have the health risks.


Giving up that pick for that package is nonsense
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:15 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,440
Quoting: McRanteskog
Perennial Selke?? My friend, Cirelli has only played 168 NHL games... on a loaded TBL team. Thats two seasons.. calm your expectations a little


I have followed him for a while. He's very good, getting better, and a guy who has elevated his game in big situations. This is the type of guy the Avs lack at C. He's Kadri but younger, better defensively, and a better fit for when Newhook takes over 2C.
Richard88 liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:17 p.m.
#9
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: moli92
Why though? We already have Kadri as the 2C with Newhook primed to take that spot once Kadri's contract expires. A 2nd line winger would be a much better target imo


Quoting: SuckMyAvs
Because you get a 23 year old perennial Selke candidate. Kadri is about to turn 30.

I also signed Toffoli, so they do both. Basically they still sign a wing and get 7 years younger at 2/3C.


Quoting: McRanteskog
^ This.
COL are already primed for a smooth transition at C with Kadri here now until Newhook is ready to take over (with Bowers falling in behind Newhook hopefully). COL needs a 2nd line winger which they can get at free agency without forfeiting a 1st + 2nd + 3rd picks


Mark me down as being onboard with a Cirelli OS. Yeah we have Newhook on the way, but that shouldn't rule us out from acquiring a Selke level C if he can be had at $5.5m x 7 years.

Newhook is clearly a C, but Avs do have a history of starting prospects out on the wing (eg. Duchene, O'Reilly, Jost, etc) so I think our transition plan would be fine.

2020/21:
Mackinnon
Kadri
Cirelli
Bellemare

2021/22
Mackinnon
Kadri
Cirelli --- Newhook at LW on 2nd or 3rd line.
Bowers

2022/23
Mackinnon
Newhook
Cirelli
Bowers

$5.5m might seem like a lot for a 3C, but keep in mind that NYI have Pageau making $5m. Once the cap rises again that $5.5m is going to look great, especially given what Cirelli brings to the table. We'd have the best C depth in the league bar none.
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:19 p.m.
#10
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: SuckMyAvs
I have followed him for a while. He's very good, getting better, and a guy who has elevated his game in big situations. This is the type of guy the Avs lack at C. He's Kadri but younger, better defensively, and a better fit for when Newhook takes over 2C.


In no way am i trying to say he wont develop into a franchise cornerstone top 6 forward type player.
Im just thinking 160 games is too small a sample size to start labeling a player a perennial Selke guy.

Theres no doubt he would fit in COL, heck, hes probably a good fit on 25+ teams in this league right now.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:19 p.m.
#11
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: McRanteskog
Perennial Selke?? My friend, Cirelli has only played 168 NHL games... on a loaded TBL team. Thats two seasons.. calm your expectations a little


Cirelli belongs in the conversation among the top 5 in the Selke this year already (Bergeron, Couturier, O'Reilly, Danault, Cirelli), and he's only 22. He's going to be in that conversation for years to come, even more so as the other guys get into their 30's.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:20 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,440
Quoting: Richard88
I don't think NJ would give up a mid-1st in a deep draft for secondary pieces like Compher/Zadorov/3rd.

I think Tampa would easily match a $5.5m AAV OS, and they'd also thank you for saving them the trouble of negotiating with Cirelli on their behalf.

I'm not overly keen on Lapierre btw. He has great vision, but something about him just seems soft. Maybe it's the fact that he's just so damn scared to shoot the puck. He gives me Kerfoot vibes, so I'd pass on him. There's better alternatives at that pick in the draft who also don't have the health risks.


They might not. Three picks and a deep pool means they may be willing though.

I don't think Tampa can match unless they move Sergachev. No one is clamouring to take Gourde or Palat, and I doubt they're in a hurry to waive their NTCs.

Agree to disagree on Lapierre. I'd be thrilled to take him. High floor and high ceiling. Only concern is the injuries for me.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:20 p.m.
#13
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: Richard88
Mark me down as being onboard with a Cirelli OS. Yeah we have Newhook on the way, but that shouldn't rule us out from acquiring a Selke level C if he can be had at $5.5m x 7 years.

Newhook is clearly a C, but Avs do have a history of starting prospects out on the wing (eg. Duchene, O'Reilly, Jost, etc) so I think our transition plan would be fine.

2020/21:
Mackinnon
Kadri
Cirelli

2021/22
Mackinnon
Kadri
Cirelli --- Newhook at LW on 2nd or 3rd line.

2021/22
Mackinnon
Newhook
Cirelli

$5.5m might seem like a lot for a 3C, but keep in mind that NYI have Pageau making $5m. Once the cap rises again that $5.5m is going to look great, especially given what Cirelli brings to the table. We'd have the best C depth in the league bar none.


Ive never been big on Bowers.. where does he slot in ?
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:21 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,440
Quoting: McRanteskog
In no way am i trying to say he wont develop into a franchise cornerstone top 6 forward type player.
Im just thinking 160 games is too small a sample size to start labeling a player a perennial Selke guy.

Theres no doubt he would fit in COL, heck, hes probably a good fit on 25+ teams in this league right now.


Fair enough. I disagree but your pov is valid.
McRanteskog liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:23 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 2,008
Sevens years at that price is probably a no go for Cirelli. TB trade Killorn and matches....
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:23 p.m.
#16
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: McRanteskog
Ive never been big on Bowers.. where does he slot in ?


I edited my post before you replied lol.... Check again to see Bowers slotted in as 4C. His natural position is C, but this season Cronin (Eagles coach) moved him to LW and he found some offense there, so he could also play on the wing if we needed him to.
McRanteskog liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:24 p.m.
#17
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Riley816
Sevens years at that price is probably a no go for Cirelli. TB trade Killorn and matches....


Tampa would need to trade more than Killorn to be able to match. One of TJ, Gourde, or Palat needs to go. I think they do find a way to move Gourde at the draft.
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:29 p.m.
#18
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: Richard88
Cirelli belongs in the conversation among the top 5 in the Selke this year already (Bergeron, Couturier, O'Reilly, Danault, Cirelli), and he's only 22. He's going to be in that conversation for years to come, even more so as the other guys get into their 30's.


Again, havent seen enough to label Cirelli "perennial"
Youll see the likes of Bergeron a few more times, O'Reilly a bunch, Couturier a ton, Barkov a few times, what about Monahan? Kopitar and Toews might have one or two more in them.
The point is, 3 get nominated and it gets very crowded very close to the top.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:35 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,440
Quoting: Richard88
Tampa would need to trade more than Killorn to be able to match. One of TJ, Gourde, or Palat needs to go. I think they do find a way to move Gourde at the draft.


I'm not sure they can move Gourde. If they enter free agency with all those guys still on the roster and are lowballing their RFAs, I would be all over this. I love having too many Cs and think it would be huge to basically make Kadri 7 years younger.

Okay, the NJ trade is a pipe dream. But that's a secondary part of this agm.
Richard88 liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 12:44 p.m.
#20
Dr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,500
Likes: 1,434
I think he would be a solid pick up but i think we'd have to move newhook or bowers just because of too many centers. None of them belong 4th line and will be more valuable center than wing. It would be nice to have someone really reliable to throw out there to match the other teams top players. I think kadri might even slide to 3C and get more offensive zone starts and cirelli getting the majority of d zone draws
Jul. 23, 2020 at 1:03 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: SuckMyAvs
Because you get a 23 year old perennial Selke candidate. Kadri is about to turn 30.

I also signed Toffoli, so they do both. Basically they still sign a wing and get 7 years younger at 2/3C.


Can you afford both Cirelli and Toffoli past this season? It looks like it will be a tight squeeze
Jul. 23, 2020 at 1:07 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,440
Quoting: ArakinSkywalker
I think he would be a solid pick up but i think we'd have to move newhook or bowers just because of too many centers. None of them belong 4th line and will be more valuable center than wing. It would be nice to have someone really reliable to throw out there to match the other teams top players. I think kadri might even slide to 3C and get more offensive zone starts and cirelli getting the majority of d zone draws


I think there is definitely room for Newhook. Bowers gets squeezed a bit, but it's worth it (imo).

I have a few slight reservations about the team:

1. Newhook may not be an impact guy right from the start
2. How long can Kadri play at a high level
3. Does the team have a good shut down line that would complement their scoring ability

Cirell addresses all of those, which is why I like this a lot.

Still a lot of unknowns regarding if this is even plausible. It might be my favorite off season scenario though.
Richard88 liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 1:08 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 3,440
Quoting: moli92
Can you afford both Cirelli and Toffoli past this season? It looks like it will be a tight squeeze


Yes by losing Kadri to Seattle. I put the outlook in the description. I found the team could even bring back Calvert.
UpsideDownQue liked this.
Jul. 23, 2020 at 1:20 p.m.
#24
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: SuckMyAvs
Yes by losing Kadri to Seattle. I put the outlook in the description. I found the team could even bring back Calvert.


I don't see why you'd have to lose Kadri to Seattle. Just expose Compher and Donskoi. You can trade Kadri if you want.

If we sign Cirelli I don't think we can afford Toffoli going forwards. And honestly with Kadri-Cirelli down the middle I'm not sure Toffoli is that big of a need. We'd have Nichuskin/Donskoi/Burakovsky/Compher/Kaut as the middle 6 forwards which would be fine. Along with some extra capspace to pick up a deadline rental like Namestnikov again (eg. Marcus Johansson).
Jul. 23, 2020 at 1:20 p.m.
#25
Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 368
Doubt they'd be able to match. If they do say goodbye to Serg and probably also Killorn
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll