SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would you trade KK

Created by: TheDuminator
Team: 2019-20 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 24, 2020
Published: Jul. 24, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Getting Cirelli for KK... does it make sense?
I know everyone think we could get for free Cirelli with an OS... but Berg won't do it to is friend in Tampa
Trades
MTL
  1. Cirelli, Anthony
Additional Details:
RFA for 6y x 6M for Cirelli
TBL
  1. Kotkaniemi, Jesperi
Additional Details:
Cost effective for the next couple of years
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$70,579,642$0$2,057,500$10,920,358
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$748,333$748,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$175,000$175K)
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,350,000$2,350,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$800,000$800,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:39 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
I feel like this isn’t a bad idea but you’re gonna get some push back based on personal opinions. I kinda like it for both sides outside looking in. Just looks bad for Montreal if KK goes off in the next year or two
Lenny7 liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:41 a.m.
#2
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
He really only (helps) solve the cap problem in Tampa for about 365 days. He'll be in line for a raise after next season, and they'll be looking to shed more contracts again, at which time they'll also be struggling to protect the proper players because of all of the NMC's that they've got.
LumberJacques liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:43 a.m.
#3
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 16,169
Likes: 20,492
Edited Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:52 a.m.
I'd rather keep KK, much more upside imo. And we already have Danault as a defensive 2C
Jo_Habs77, LumberJacques, SlevinKalevra and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:43 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 538
Quoting: Lenny7
He really only (helps) solve the cap problem in Tampa for about 365 days. He'll be in line for a raise after next season, and they'll be looking to shed more contracts again, at which time they'll also be struggling to protect the proper players because of all of the NMC's that they've got.


unless he shoots the lights out next season he will be on a bridge deal probably less than $3M

i also think KK still has lots of upside even though Cirelli will be a perennial Selke candidate
Lenny7, LumberJacques, Kotkaniemi15 and 1 other person liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:45 a.m.
#5
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: BigOaf69
unless he shoots the lights out next season he will be on a bridge deal probably less than $3M


I mean, he'd have offensive players to play with, so the likelihood would be pretty high.
LumberJacques and TheDuminator liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.
#6
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Not. A. Chance.
Jo_Habs77 liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:55 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,763
Quoting: Lenny7
He really only (helps) solve the cap problem in Tampa for about 365 days. He'll be in line for a raise after next season, and they'll be looking to shed more contracts again, at which time they'll also be struggling to protect the proper players because of all of the NMC's that they've got.


they have 3 NMCs... Hedman, stamkos, kucherov. everyone else can be exposed if they choose. that means, johnson, palat, and gourde can all be exposed.
Lenny7 liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 658
Valuewise it's close. More certainty and higher floor in Cirelli but higher ceiling for KK. You just have to see more games from KK before thinking of trading him.

So short version is no.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 11:10 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,483
Likes: 6,418
The guy I see helping Tampa the most would be Jacob Olofsson. He has great potential to be a 2C and still has not signed his ELC so would be cost controlled for at least 3 years. However it would take a much better package than just a 1 for 1 in this case. Maybe they go Fleury + Olofsson + 2nd for Cirelli (not even sure if that would be enough) but then the Habs have to move a Center and not sure who that would be. Maybe Suzuki moves to the wing and you could line up

Tatar-Kotkaniemi-Gallagher
Domi-Cirelli-Suzuki
Drouin-Danault-Armia
Lehkonen-Evans-Byron
Jul. 24, 2020 at 11:45 a.m.
#10
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,319
Likes: 3,331
I wouldnt do it, yet. He just has to much potential and having him and Suzuki as your 1 and 2 C for the foreseeable future is the way to go. It would also mean more of a battle to earn your top 6 minutrs which will make a better player out of him and trading a center as a position of strength is something Bergevin has never gotten to do
Jul. 24, 2020 at 11:52 a.m.
#11
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: Campabee
The guy I see helping Tampa the most would be Jacob Olofsson. He has great potential to be a 2C and still has not signed his ELC so would be cost controlled for at least 3 years. However it would take a much better package than just a 1 for 1 in this case. Maybe they go Fleury + Olofsson + 2nd for Cirelli (not even sure if that would be enough) but then the Habs have to move a Center and not sure who that would be. Maybe Suzuki moves to the wing and you could line up

Tatar-Kotkaniemi-Gallagher
Domi-Cirelli-Suzuki
Drouin-Danault-Armia
Lehkonen-Evans-Byron


I don’t think Tampa’s in the business of trading for players that won’t play in the NHL for 3+ years. And I doubt Olofsson ever ends up anything higher than a 3C. So certainly not the main piece in a trade for any top 6 forward.
Daredevil514 liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 12:31 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,571
Likes: 6,715
Why trade KK for Cirelli when there is a serious option to OS him instead? Tampa can't possibly match any realistic offer without sacrificing other players like Sergachev and Cernak in the process. Not to mention finding trade partners for the NMC/s and NTC/s they need to trade out.

Trading KK now, would be quite simply the most irresponsible thing a Habs GM can do. Think Sergachev trade. Think Mcdonagh trade. Think Leclair trade. We need to stop making the same mistakes. KK is not going to be Galchenyuk. We just need to be patient with him.
Campabee liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 12:38 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,483
Likes: 6,418
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
I don’t think Tampa’s in the business of trading for players that won’t play in the NHL for 3+ years. And I doubt Olofsson ever ends up anything higher than a 3C. So certainly not the main piece in a trade for any top 6 forward.


I thought Olofsson's ceiling was higher and he was closer to being ready, perhaps either Ikonen or Yelonen then. My point was they would be looking for a young top 6 forward on an ELC for at least 2 or 3 years
Jul. 24, 2020 at 1:37 p.m.
#14
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: Campabee
I thought Olofsson's ceiling was higher and he was closer to being ready, perhaps either Ikonen or Yelonen then. My point was they would be looking for a young top 6 forward on an ELC for at least 2 or 3 years


Ikonen is even less of a sure thing than Olofsson. Ylönen would fit the kind of prospect you’re thinking of, but that wouldn’t make sense for the habs at all.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 1:39 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,483
Likes: 6,418
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Ikonen is even less of a sure thing than Olofsson. Ylönen would fit the kind of prospect you’re thinking of, but that wouldn’t make sense for the habs at all.


Yeah I was more just laying out examples of what Tampa would be interested in for young guys with longer ELC's not proposing a trade or anything
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 2:03 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
HabsFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 933
Quoting: F50marco
Why trade KK for Cirelli when there is a serious option to OS him instead? Tampa can't possibly match any realistic offer without sacrificing other players like Sergachev and Cernak in the process. Not to mention finding trade partners for the NMC/s and NTC/s they need to trade out.

Trading KK now, would be quite simply the most irresponsible thing a Habs GM can do. Think Sergachev trade. Think Mcdonagh trade. Think Leclair trade. We need to stop making the same mistakes. KK is not going to be Galchenyuk. We just need to be patient with him.


Hold on man...
1- Has I wrote; we can OS Cirelli but on a value perpetive... KK for Cirelli
2- I am not saying KK is a bust otherwise the value doesn't make no sense for Tampa... but getting a READY TOP2C in Cirelli instead of a longer devlopment time with a higher ceilling is it fair and doesn't it make sense for both team?
Jul. 24, 2020 at 2:50 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,571
Likes: 6,715
Quoting: DomCholette
Hold on man...
1- Has I wrote; we can OS Cirelli but on a value perpetive... KK for Cirelli
2- I am not saying KK is a bust otherwise the value doesn't make no sense for Tampa... but getting a READY TOP2C in Cirelli instead of a longer devlopment time with a higher ceilling is it fair and doesn't it make sense for both team?


In theory, value wise it really depends on how you evaluate both players. It will be more or less depending on who you talk to. I still reiterate, trading KK now is a huge mistake. I think KK will be better than Cirelli in short time. I like Cirelli as much as the next guy but Tampa has a knack of inflating players abilities because they have a circus team of super talent. Cirelli will not produce as much as people are projecting him to if he goes to another team. I guarantee it.

KK has the ceiling for a Olli Jokinen/Mikko Koivu hybrid and that will be way more valuable to the Habs than Cirelli is now and will be IMO. We have to be patient with KK, he is still so young and developing. If Montreal wants star players they got to stop trading them away for ready now players.
TheDuminator liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll