SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Filling all the needs

Created by: csick
Team: 2020-21 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 27, 2020
Published: Jul. 27, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$7,000,000
4$5,000,000
3$3,000,000
1$700,000
3$3,000,000
2$900,000
1$900,000
2$4,750,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Cirelli, Anthony [RFA Rights]
TBL
  1. 2020 1st round pick (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. 2020 6th round pick (PHI)
Additional Details:
Anywhere
3.
BUF
  1. Brodin, Jonas ($2,000,000 retained)
MIN
  1. Samuelsson, Mattias
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Becomes a 1st if he re-signs
Maybe add Mitts if this isnt enough
4.
BUF
  1. Hjalmarsson, Niklas ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. Raanta, Antti
ARI
  1. Miller, Colin
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (BUF)
5.
WPG
  1. Montour, Brandon [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,329,167$1,487,500$4,337,500$170,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$2,280,000$2,280,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$700,000$700,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$845,000$845,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,166,667$2,166,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$864,166$864,166
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 27, 2020 at 3:33 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 511
Likes: 183
New CBA doesn't allow conditions based on player resigning.
Jul. 27, 2020 at 3:36 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,157
Likes: 23,514
Quoting: BruceWayne17
New CBA doesn't allow conditions based on player resigning.


ah damn i keep forgetting about that. Why tho? If im a team i dont want to pay full value for a rental and this allows you to get more if the player stays
Jul. 27, 2020 at 3:53 p.m.
#3
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,556
Likes: 12,310
Quoting: BruceWayne17
New CBA doesn't allow conditions based on player resigning.


Always thought those were the dumbest conditions, like a team traded assets for a UFA and then they gotta give more if they sign the guy, that was such nonsense!
csick liked this.
Jul. 27, 2020 at 3:54 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Even with Mitts I think that trade would be a mistake. We need a top 6 C if we trade Brodin and while Mitts may be one he's a massive question mark
SalamiCheese and dzmets liked this.
Jul. 27, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
I don't think Minnesota will make this deal. Guerin will probably try to trade Dumba or Brodin for the top 6 center
csick liked this.
Jul. 27, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,157
Likes: 23,514
Quoting: SalamiCheese
I don't think Minnesota will make this deal. Guerin will probably try to trade Dumba or Brodin for the top 6 center


i dont think they can without an extension. Plus a 2c is worth more than a 2LD considering theres plenty of d options in free agency
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Jul. 27, 2020 at 4:05 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: TanSor
Even with Mitts I think that trade would be a mistake. We need a top 6 C if we trade Brodin and while Mitts may be one he's a massive question mark


I think this trade is tough for both teams. Brodin is a very good defenseman but unless it is a sign and trade he is only worth a big return to a contender. The Sabres are giving up Samudlsson whonprojects to be a similar player to Brodin in 2 - 3 years a 2nd and if they include Mitts likely at worst a 40 point middle six forward at best a 60 point 2C. It is just too much capital for a possible 1 year rental.for a team in Buffalos position. Value wise that trade is probably right though future 2nd, Samuelsson and Middlestadt
csick liked this.
Jul. 27, 2020 at 4:07 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
Quoting: csick
i dont think they can without an extension. Plus a 2c is worth more than a 2LD considering theres plenty of d options in free agency


Well, as I understand it, he did not want to trade Brodin for Trocheck in the deadline. In some teams Brodin will have #1 LD, he is a very good defender, the only question is in his contract term, the extension of the contract will certainly increase his value.
dzmets and csick liked this.
Jul. 27, 2020 at 5:24 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
These moves are great, but idk how realistic they are
But let’s say u can pull them all off...
I’d rather hang on to Montour if all you’re getting is a 3rd liner for him
That way when we lose either Risto or Montour to Seattle,
we’d still have 1 of them
I don’t think Hjarmalsson is waiving to come here anyways

And even though Cirelli is a good 2way forward,
I don’t wanna dump an excessive defensive load on him like we did with O’Reilly
Especially if his wingers are Olofsson & Sam
We need all the offense we can get outta that line imo
So bring back Larsson as the “4C” to take on some of that defensive responsibility from Cirelli’s line

Also...
I’m assuming we aren’t gonna re-sign Johansson after this season bc we’d wanna allocate that Cap elsewhere (Brodin for example)
So play him on Jack’s wing to score the most points possible & trade him at the deadline to get as good of a return as we can
csick liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll