SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keep Petro AND Steen

Created by: Blueman96
Team: 2020-21 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 29, 2020
Published: Jul. 29, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Jeremy Rutherford just commented in a recent article that there's "no appetite" among management to buy out Alex Steen. He means a lot to the franchise. So how would re-signing Petro work if you can't buy him out?

IF we can get Petro at the Josi deal or less and IF we can deal both Jake Allen and Tyler Bozak at full cap hits and IF we can get Dunn at $2.5 or lower, we can actually get in BARELY under the cap, only moving 2 players.

DO IT ARMEEEEEEEE
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$9,059,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (PHI)
  2. 2022 6th round pick (PHI)
PHI
  1. Allen, Jake
  2. 2021 5th round pick (STL)
2.
STL
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (MTL)
  2. 2021 5th round pick (MTL)
MTL
  1. Bozak, Tyler
  2. 2020 4th round pick (STL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the CAR
2021
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2022
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$72,417,848$306,349$425,000$9,082,152
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LW, RW, C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,350,000$5,350,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,475,000$1,475,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$758,333$758,333
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$9,059,000$9,059,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,400,000$4,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,275,000$3,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,375,000$1,375,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 29, 2020 at 1:51 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
SEND A 1ST AND MTL WILL TAKE BOZAK smile
Jul. 29, 2020 at 1:54 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 629
Likes: 66
Just move both to Detroit for a retained helm and pickard. They then have the option of making them deadline deals
Jul. 29, 2020 at 1:56 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 796
Likes: 321
Flyers aren't biting on that, not much room cap wise once we sign everyone and adding a $4 million backup won't help.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 1:57 p.m.
#4
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,047
Likes: 3,752
If not giving better assets away with them, at least take a less return.

I mean your goal is to get cap right?
And I thought Pietrangelo already rejected 9ish million?
Jul. 29, 2020 at 1:58 p.m.
#5
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Deal. Then we flip him at 50% retained for a 2nd.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 2:16 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 3,030
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Deal. Then we flip him at 50% retained for a 2nd.


%s wise, a 3rd and a 5th is worth more than the 2nd you got and you will have retained to get it.
dzmets and Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 2:17 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: Trickster
If not giving better assets away with them, at least take a less return.

I mean your goal is to get cap right?
And I thought Pietrangelo already rejected 9ish million?


8.5 Pietrangelo rejected 8.5
Jul. 29, 2020 at 2:23 p.m.
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,401
Likes: 22,624
Bozak's M NTC, might be a trade problem....though Bozak is on a good contract. Pietrangelo....flat cap, the market has changed since pre Covid. 8.5m or so might be the max deal now, especially if it means signing with a good team.
mokumboi liked this.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 2:32 p.m.
#9
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 934
Quoting: Trickster
If not giving better assets away with them, at least take a less return.

I mean your goal is to get cap right?
And I thought Pietrangelo already rejected 9ish million?


Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
8.5 Pietrangelo rejected 8.5


Everything is different now with the flat cap so what he has or hasn't rejected in the past (and every "rejection" thus far is speculation anyway) isn't as meaningful. $68mil might be his best offer now and the Blues can offer that
Jul. 29, 2020 at 2:40 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 596
Likes: 328
Quoting: msekkes
Flyers aren't biting on that, not much room cap wise once we sign everyone and adding a $4 million backup won't help.


Exactly my thought. I am not against having Allen as a backup, we just cannot afford him with our current cap situation.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 3:00 p.m.
#11
Still a Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 661
dunn making double that
Jul. 29, 2020 at 4:06 p.m.
#12
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: Byrr
%s wise, a 3rd and a 5th is worth more than the 2nd you got and you will have retained to get it.


Yeah I didn’t think that through. Never mind then.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 4:37 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
dunn making double that


Doubtful not proven enough over 3 years. It’s it a consistent stat line. He should take the bridge deal to get more for a long-term deal.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 4:38 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Everything is different now with the flat cap so what he has or hasn't rejected in the past (and every "rejection" thus far is speculation anyway) isn't as meaningful. $68mil might be his best offer now and the Blues can offer that


Technically he did reject it, and still under these circumstances I didn’t know why. I really don’t think anyone is going to pay a 8 figure sum to him based on history of aging defenseman like Doughty and Karlsson crapping out.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 4:54 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 278
Likes: 112
Quoting: palhal
Bozak's M NTC, might be a trade problem....though Bozak is on a good contract. Pietrangelo....flat cap, the market has changed since pre Covid. 8.5m or so might be the max deal now, especially if it means signing with a good team.


It'll definitely be a problem. He can reject 10 teams and if you cut out the bottom 10 in the league there are very few teams with cap space to send him to. Montreal is one of them that may not be on his list that Blues even COULD trade him to. It'd be a minor miracle if Armstrong was able to move him at his total cap hit. It may be a situation where the Blues have to pay someone to take him. We'll see.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 4:58 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 278
Likes: 112
Quoting: ALitteral
Exactly my thought. I am not against having Allen as a backup, we just cannot afford him with our current cap situation.


It'd be technically possible (Flyers have about $9m in cap space for next year), but tight. With Allen at $4.3 Flyers would have about $4.7 million for 4 players to flesh out the roster. Not a "good" situation but not impossible. If you bring Braun back then yea there's no way. Blues may have to have a different dance partner for him.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 5:01 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 278
Likes: 112
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Technically he did reject it, and still under these circumstances I didn’t know why. I really don’t think anyone is going to pay a 8 figure sum to him based on history of aging defenseman like Doughty and Karlsson crapping out.


That's always the risk right? If you sign him to the 8 year deal you're hoping for, what, 3-4 really productive years? Hopefully? Then you get "something" out of him for the next 1-2 and years 7-8 you assume are just dead years? That's been pretty much par for the course I feel like.

I don't know who would be paying Petro THAT much more on the free agent market where he'd also want to go and could compete for a cup. Even the teams with cap space likely wouldn't shell out for him because it's just a waste of money frankly. I think if the Blues offered him the Josi deal or even slightly less ($8.75 AAV?) at 8 years he'd be foolish not to take it. I don't know how much better he can do on the free agent market for a team in any better of a circumstance, and also for 1 year less. But I guess we'll see.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 8:50 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 596
Likes: 328
Quoting: Blueman96
It'd be technically possible (Flyers have about $9m in cap space for next year), but tight. With Allen at $4.3 Flyers would have about $4.7 million for 4 players to flesh out the roster. Not a "good" situation but not impossible. If you bring Braun back then yea there's no way. Blues may have to have a different dance partner for him.


That includes resigning Myers, NAK, and Patrick. I find it really hard to spend than much on a backup unless we have other deals working to ship out salary.
Aug. 3, 2020 at 11:55 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 278
Likes: 112
Quoting: ALitteral
That includes resigning Myers, NAK, and Patrick. I find it really hard to spend than much on a backup unless we have other deals working to ship out salary.


Yea maybe not. San Jose? Buffalo? Calgary?

Washington could be a possibility. They pretty much have everybody locked up for next year and Jake Allen would be a great upgrade from Phoenix Copley backing up Samsonov.

I guess however you slice it, Blues would need to find a way to move his whole cap hit on the 1 year plan.
Aug. 3, 2020 at 11:58 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 491
Quoting: Blueman96
Yea maybe not. San Jose? Buffalo? Calgary?

Washington could be a possibility. They pretty much have everybody locked up for next year and Jake Allen would be a great upgrade from Phoenix Copley backing up Samsonov.

I guess however you slice it, Blues would need to find a way to move his whole cap hit on the 1 year plan.

I look at WSH as the best spot because Allen would be in a very similar role where he’s backing up a young talented goalie. Binnington raved about Allen’s mentorship on his run last year. There’s also trade history between the teams so it seems plausible.
Aug. 3, 2020 at 12:13 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 278
Likes: 112
Quoting: BluesBandit
I look at WSH as the best spot because Allen would be in a very similar role where he’s backing up a young talented goalie. Binnington raved about Allen’s mentorship on his run last year. There’s also trade history between the teams so it seems plausible.


Yea playing around with their Armchair GM they'd have some decisions to make on defense if they take on Allen's full cap hit. Brenden Dillon would be the big question. If they bring him back it might be a long term deal to keep the AAV down so maybe there's some room there. But yea it'd be a hard sell to get the Caps to take on the full cap hit with some re-tooling on defense and possibly re-signing Kovalchuk and Travis Boyd
Aug. 3, 2020 at 12:15 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 596
Likes: 328
Quoting: Blueman96
Yea maybe not. San Jose? Buffalo? Calgary?

Washington could be a possibility. They pretty much have everybody locked up for next year and Jake Allen would be a great upgrade from Phoenix Copley backing up Samsonov.

I guess however you slice it, Blues would need to find a way to move his whole cap hit on the 1 year plan.


After the showing on Saturday, Edmonton could probably use a goalie. tears of joy
Aug. 7, 2020 at 12:20 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 278
Likes: 112
Quoting: Trickster
If not giving better assets away with them, at least take a less return.

I mean your goal is to get cap right?
And I thought Pietrangelo already rejected 9ish million?


I hadn't seen that. If he has, I would assume that was pre-COVID. I think several players are probably kicking themselves for not getting extensions in place pre-Coronavirus and the prospect of a flat cap for 2 years.
Aug. 7, 2020 at 12:26 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 278
Likes: 112
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Everything is different now with the flat cap so what he has or hasn't rejected in the past (and every "rejection" thus far is speculation anyway) isn't as meaningful. $68mil might be his best offer now and the Blues can offer that


The only contending team that has the cap space to sign him is Boston. To do so they'd have to let Krug walk and probably someone else. That would screw up their left side D. They also don't really need help on the right side with McAvoy being the number one and decent players behind him. So I don't think it makes sense for the Bruins to do it.

The teams with the cap space either (1) aren't (probably) attractive to Petro and (2) aren't going to be spending that money anyway. The only contracts non-contenders are taking on are high AAV, low cash deals for immediate assets. Makes zero sense for them to sign a high profile free agent in a zero income sports economy.

With a flat cap for 2 years (at least?) the bargaining power has shifted back to the Blues. We want him, we could make it work, and there's really no other contender that would pay him the same or more.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll